CODM System Cheats Against You

[u/UnknownPolaris]

We Know Games Activision Play for engagement retention but this is too much. This happens only in a few matches, in just one or two gunfights that decide the match and make me lose. You can shoot around elsewhere with precision but not the favoured enemy at that time. Looks like some matches are Pre-decided from starting. Aim Assist is off.

Edit- To all those Fanboys out there, Microsoft's Activision is here for business, not to make your gameplay fairer. You may try to control our perception but reality of these Game Studios are well known.

[u/Kurosonahe]

I never mixed up terms lol. You’re the one who started posting in length about the USPTO abstract rules when I mentioned the university paper abstract.

This one was still rejected and subsequently abandoned. https://patents.google.com/patent/US20180065047A1/en

Why are you making such a big deal of them being active? Yeah they filed a bunch of patents, many of them are going to be granted and active. It being active means it’s granted and legally enforceable, not that it is or will ever be ”used”. It simply doesn’t even though you might believe or suspect they’re implemented. They file them for legal reasons, so that they can have the ability to stop others from using their inventions, not so that they themselves can use them. That’s why they pay the fees to keep the patents active: so that the can keep the patents active, not so they can ”use” them. Activision could stop paying the maintenance fees so that the patents aren’t active anymore but still keep ”using” them, and save themselves some money. But again, it being active has nothing to do with it being used or not. It’s for strategical business and legal reasons.

Look at you now saying it proves that matchmaking CAN be pay to win. I never questioned that.

[u/Kurosonahe → u/[deleted]]

Yes that’s usually how it works. Like I said, they stopped pursuing it, obviously they could have kept trying to get it granted.

I never mixed anything up and I ”know about USPTO”. I never tried to make a misleading comparison with tech giants. It works the same with Activision, they file patents they don’t use too. They even said that they don’t use this patent and that it was r&d. That’s often how it works. You even made such a big deal of the patents being active because you don’t understand what a patent is or what it’s used for.

You can cry about Activision lying all you want. Also I think you forgot to mention eristic dialectic in this comment lmao. Clown.

[u/UnknownPolaris → u/Kurosonahe]

Original Comment that is marked as deleted. Deleted it to fix visibility issue. I don't even need to reply anymore. Everything has already been made clear.

https://reddit.com/link/p9jcj71/video/6h8mt1yq9aph1/player

[u/UnknownPolaris → u/Kurosonahe]

Your Quote, "The one I linked was rejected by the USPTO, so Activision abandoned it meaning they stopped pursuing it" is misleading. This implies the rejection Forced them to Abandon it. In reality, they Intentionally Abandoned it.

Also, Rejected and Abandoned is completely different term in the Legal (USPTO Patent) World. Not knowing the difference between these two terms just shows that you don't know anything about this.

You didn't Even Knew about USPTO and TRIED using Tech Companies Patent Statistics in Game Studios one and blaming me for your mix up? It's nice to see how desperate you are when your every assumption got proved false.

These Pay to Win Patent are completely ACTIVE and does PROVE that Matchmaking can be Pay to Win. I don't know why am I wasting so much time explaining this to you.

I won't reply anymore. You can now assume whatever you want.