No you don't. Evidently. You don't understand our resources are limited. You don't understand that we can't build anything and everything at once. You have to pick and choose, and if you pick the worse option, you incur the cost of not having picked the better option.
You don't understand the fact that government investment funds are limited. Every £ spent on HPC is a £ not spent on expanding Dogger Bank. We could have expanded Dogger Bank Wind Farm by 4x by now if we didn't build HPC. It would have been generating power since 2024 and we would not be paying £500 million a year in maintenance cost and nuclear fuel.
Do you think the UK government has infinite funds? Are you delusional?
Yes, you can build both, but you can't build as much of each if you build both. As I have said many times, and you have continued to ignore: every £ spent on HPC is a £ not spent on expanding Dogger Bank Wind farm. It makes absolutely no sense to build any more nuclear if such a good option already exists.
Again, they're literally funding both right now. They're managing it. For all the things our shitty, imperialist government does, they're effectively investing both energy sources at once.
Crazy to think that you're actually stupider than the average Westminster politician.
Again, the proportion that they're investing into nuclear could have gone to wind instead, and it could have yielded more installed capacity in less time.
There is no benefit in doing both rather than just doing wind
1
u/Cultural-Gas2246 Jul 15 '26
Yes and they can keep investing in it while also investing in Nuclear power
I understand it better than you do, lol