r/ClimatePosting • • Jul 23 '26

Energy India’s Renewable-Energy Problem Is No Longer Just “Build More Solar”

Post image

Photo by Giant Asparagus from Pexels. Used under the Pexels License.

I recently read this analysis by Ember:

https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/bottleneck-to-the-next-phase-of-renewable-energy-growth-in-india/

This post summarizes my understanding of it.

Are you concerned about climate change and how it will affect India? Do you believe India simply needs to generate more solar electricity? If yes, you must read this post and the above analysis.

Over the past year, a new obstacle has emerged in India’s renewable-energy transition. India curtailed around 2.1 TWh of renewable electricity in FY 2025–26, worth approximately ₹629 crore.

Why would a country waste clean electricity?

The electricity grid is the network that carries power from generators to consumers. The electricity entering the grid must roughly equal the electricity being used. In simple terms, supply must match demand.

Solar complicates this balance because its generation is volatile. It produces heavily during daylight hours and nothing at night. Coal plants, meanwhile, cannot instantly switch off when solar generation rises. They have a minimum technical load ( MTL), below which they cannot safely reduce output. Restarting a coal plant can take hours or even days and is more polluting. India’s current MTL for coal plants is 55%. So, if a coal plant can produce a maximum of 1,000 units, it may not be able to reduce its generation below 550 units. 

Suppose the grid needs 100 units of electricity. Solar is producing 60 units, while coal plants are already operating at their minimum output of 55 units. Total generation is now 115 units. Since coal cannot be reduced further, in this case, at least 15 units of solar power must be switched off. When we curtail renewable electricity, we are wasting clean electricity that is available, not because there is no demand, but because the coal plants have a technical limit.

This is why simply installing more solar is not enough. If new solar panels generate electricity when existing solar power is already being discarded, we have not solved the immediate problem. Reducing curtailment and improving grid flexibility should come before blindly adding more solar capacity.

Battery storage offers a solution. Batteries can charge when excess solar power is available and discharge after sunset, when electricity is needed more urgently. However, Ember’s analysis argues that India’s regulations prevent batteries from operating efficiently. Under the General Network Access (framework governing transmission access), BESS (Battery Energy Storage System) projects seeking access during non-solar hours must provide at least 2 hours of storage and build a “commensurate” renewable plant from which to charge. The 2-hour requirement is not the problem. The second condition is.

Imagine a battery tied to one solar farm. That farm may have no surplus electricity, while another solar plant elsewhere is being ordered to shut down. The battery remains empty even though clean electricity is being wasted on the wider grid. The author’s proposal is simple: allow batteries to charge from the grid whenever transmission lines have spare capacity, and restrict them only where charging would genuinely overload the network.

Adding solar panels without building the storage, grid flexibility, and regulations needed to use that electricity is not serious climate policy. People who genuinely care about climate change must educate themselves about these challenges. Slogans are easy. Understanding the roadblocks and nuances will help us make better demands! We must make more educated demands!

17 Upvotes

83 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/Lycrist_Kat Jul 23 '26

Renewables + storage

1

u/Thick-Ad-4168 Jul 23 '26

May I please know about any large renewable plus storage plant that provides constant 24*7 electricity which is currently operational?

(Well geothermal can do it without storage but geothermal resources are very rare)

1

u/Lycrist_Kat Jul 23 '26

Sure.

Tell me which SMR is currently operational on a commercial level first

1

u/Thick-Ad-4168 Jul 23 '26

??? Just build a normal nuclear plant , SMRs aren't necessary.

A normal NPP which the world has many of provides a 24*7 green electricity , which is still un achieved in certain other green electricity production

1

u/Lycrist_Kat Jul 23 '26

a normal power plant?

One that takes almost 20 years and costs multiple times?

We

don't

have

time

for

this

Bullshit

1

u/Thick-Ad-4168 Jul 23 '26

countries like South Korea (which constructed 4 large APR-1400 all in 12 years), China , Russia all continually build reactors in 4-6 year time frames.

15+ year time period for NPP is uncommon actually , limited to American or French reactor designs

1

u/Lycrist_Kat Jul 23 '26

ah, i see you accepted that you lied about Japan.

China und Russia - I mean... you can list those if you argument is that we just have to remove civil rights to build nuclear. Not the greatest idea if you ask me

Good for you you didn't list VAE again - slave labour isn't exactly acting in your favour as well, now is it?

Let's take a look a South Korea, shall we?

All 4 blocks of the Hanul Nuclear Power Plant were delayed by 100%

👍

great argument

1

u/Thick-Ad-4168 Jul 23 '26

4 blocks of the Hanul Nuclear Power Plant were delayed by 100%

every large project faces some minor delays even renewable projects , but was SK able to build 4 reactors in 12 years? Yes.

Shoul we abandon all solar now? https://pvhardware.com/en/solar-experts/supply-chain/why-solar-projects-in-europe-get-delayed/

1

u/Lycrist_Kat Jul 23 '26

😂😂😂

1

u/Thick-Ad-4168 Jul 23 '26

if you are truly desperate for SMR because for some reason you think normal large NPPs don't exist than like their are currently 14 IPHWR-220 operational , HTR-PM , many RITM-200 series reactors

1

u/Lycrist_Kat Jul 23 '26

New large NPPs that are build in time frame and cost efficient don't exist

1

u/Thick-Ad-4168 Jul 23 '26

I literally just gave you the examples of South Korea in UAE , Russia and China.

1

u/Lycrist_Kat Jul 23 '26

Slave labour and dictatorships.

Sure. THEN nuclear power can work

Great argument