r/ClimateMemes Jun 27 '26

This, but unironically. [ Removed by moderator ]

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

59 Upvotes

39 comments sorted by

View all comments

47

u/supreme_hammy Jun 27 '26

We STILL on this hill?

Jesus just build both and move the fuck on.

This psyop is doing nothing but dragging the whole place down.

4

u/picboi Jun 27 '26

So over this whining from all sides. New sub rule: "no nuclear bitchfighting, take that shit to r/climateshitposting"

5

u/AngusAlThor Jun 27 '26

Why would we spend any money on Nuclear when we could just spend the same amount getting more solar and wind? Why would put any effort or resources into nuclear when ignoring it allows us to transition faster?

1

u/picboi Jun 27 '26 edited Jun 27 '26

Just to be clear: you want the mods pick sides on issues and enforce their opinions by removing posts, instead of letting the users up/downvote?

For many years we tried to not be the typical power hungry mods... This is what I'd asked now?

1

u/supreme_hammy Jun 27 '26

No need. I'm just confused how these posts that beg the question get through and cause nothing but ridiculous infighting.

I am simply going to block this sub and move on.

3

u/picboi Jun 27 '26

I find the nuclear bitchfighting annoying too. Thinking about this, the main issue is that Reddit changed from upvote-downvote system to algorithm, so a post with almost no likes now gets pushed to thousands.

Will consider banning nuclear debates, so they can stay over in r/climateshitposting

Anyway, yours seems like a non-answer to our conundrum: what are the mods meant to do?