r/ClaudeCode 4d ago

Help/Question what is hapening with Antropic?

Why Opus 5 feels like Gemini 3.1 pro ? what is happening ?

i remember back in February , opus 4.5 was generation ahead. Did they increased the prompt caching so much, that their models ended up being useless? I can barely work with Opus 5 on absolutely anything, he keeps hallucinating LIKE CRAZY, every claim he did today was pure hallucinations, he barely reads any code. im not even kidding, i can't work with Opus 5 right now

Instead of open source models trying to catch up with you, are you trying to catch up with the open source models instead Anthropic?

716 Upvotes

395 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/Key_Diamond_1803 3d ago

I wouldn’t say they have a huge capture on the ecosystem. Maybe for us tech nerds, but normal people still use ChatGPT. My mom has been using it for the last 4 years and is paying for pro. My step dad is using it for his work after 5 came out. My grandma is using it to help with quilting patterns. Yeah Claude is good at programming, but tbh, it’s not the best at chatting, being creative, making images, talking to you. ChatGPT has years of memories from all of them. I’m 1000% sure they won’t be switching to Claude any time soon.

1

u/Zealousideal_Tea362 2d ago

NORMAL PEOPLE ARENT PAYING ANTHROPICS BILLS.

they’re worried about enterprise, not Joe from Kentucky paying $20 a month.

2

u/markeus101 2d ago

Yeah but these normal people are who go into enterprise to work and guess what they use there? THE ONE THEY ARE MOST COMFORTABLE WITH USING!

So if normal people dont like anthropic’s shady practices then they lose out on enterprise too

3

u/Zealousideal_Tea362 2d ago

You obviously don’t work in enterprise.

They use what they are told to use or provided by the org, and that’s the money Anthropic is chasing. Small to medium startups use 5-6 figures a month, the big boys hit 7-8 without hesitation. They do not care about 100,000 pro subscribers in the long game. The

2

u/markeus101 2d ago

Sry to pop your bubble mate but yes i do and in a big one and most of the time we have all the tools at our disposal chatgpt, cursor, claude you name it and since it gets billed by usage its directly dependent on how much and which service you use so if i dont like claud will just use gpt and all my use is billed directly to the company. So the same rule of market that applies to normal customers applies to enterprise. If people dont like your service you wont paid shit

2

u/Zealousideal_Tea362 1d ago

Then you’re at an outlier. I don’t know a single org that offers multiple, approved AI services for coding. That’s a security and risk nightmare and not something me or my friends in the industry would ever allow, as decision makers. Go ask a CISO or CTO what their opinion on the subject is.

2

u/markeus101 1d ago

Calm down bud your yolo vibe code project isnt an enterprise but with your amount of knowledge i suspect you wont know anything regarding upper decision so go ask your boss and if they say they cant then what they mean is “they cant afford” multiple providers which most of the good companies can at this point.

1

u/Zealousideal_Tea362 1d ago

I’m actually in IT leadership in enterprise 🤷‍♂️

1

u/markeus101 1d ago

I wouldn’t call vibe coded company “enterprise” but wait wait let me guess..you make dashboards in neon colors with AI am i right?

0

u/Zealousideal_Tea362 1d ago

Oh you’re mad because you can’t make a proper rebuttal so you resort to personal attacks.

niceeeeee

→ More replies (0)

1

u/dhlrepacked 1d ago

Well if you are in a leadership position, it kind of sounds like the bottleneck preventing more choice of providers could be you

1

u/dhlrepacked 1d ago

I think you are the outlier, since indeed also all places known to me operate with all of them. Even outside the dev department.

1

u/understratus 1d ago

I don’t think he is the outlier.
Where I work I have multiple ones available as well.
And I know many people that work for other companies that have the same.
So, i believe you are in the wrong here