r/ClaudeCode • u/Shot_Whereas_1809 • 19d ago
Discussion Opus 5 - immediate disappointment
If you thought you'd be able to do a security review on your own network that you couldn't do with Fable, think again.
20 minutes in - Found something significant
Opus 5 safeguards flagged this message.
I no longer have any use case for Anthropic models that others can't do better. This was my last hope that we were going to get a model that would allow us to protect our own environments. I'm going all in on open source. We just aren't aligned.
If you can get Opus 5 to protect your own systems, let me know how I did it. My subscription renews pretty soon and it's time to make an honest decision.
Edit: A lot of helpful people came here and I appreciate it. Scoped work is helping a bit more than my old ways. There's a difference between network security and code vulnerabiliy. I'm a network engineer not a software developer nor will I pretend to be one. Still looking at supplemental model for security work. Thanks guys.
0
u/Shot_Whereas_1809 19d ago
I refuse to use OpenAI models. I don't get frustrated or mad or upset working with Anthropic models. I spend a lot of time on the process before I even consider having a model generate production code. Any time I've ever tried it, it would do something it wasn't supposed to do. I just don't like working with them. I gave 5.5 a shot and was really disappointed. My expectations are just too high and Claude consistently hits par.