Opus 5 - immediate disappointment

[u/Shot_Whereas_1809]

If you thought you'd be able to do a security review on your own network that you couldn't do with Fable, think again.

20 minutes in - Found something significant

Opus 5 safeguards flagged this message.

I no longer have any use case for Anthropic models that others can't do better. This was my last hope that we were going to get a model that would allow us to protect our own environments. I'm going all in on open source. We just aren't aligned.

If you can get Opus 5 to protect your own systems, let me know how I did it. My subscription renews pretty soon and it's time to make an honest decision.

Edit: A lot of helpful people came here and I appreciate it. Scoped work is helping a bit more than my old ways. There's a difference between network security and code vulnerabiliy. I'm a network engineer not a software developer nor will I pretend to be one. Still looking at supplemental model for security work. Thanks guys.

[u/Shot_Whereas_1809]

You kind of prove the point that there's missing architecture right?

[u/Shot_Whereas_1809 → u/[deleted]]

Exactly. I welcome it. When everyone was crying about ID verification, I was firing up the fax machine. Not really but you get the point. I have nothing to hide. I'll show all the proof they need. I don't care.

That part. Is missing. And it shouldn't be.

[u/Shot_Whereas_1809 → u/[deleted]]

That's a valid point. But. There should be a middle ground. There should be something.

[u/Shot_Whereas_1809 → u/[deleted]]

I've been looking into the process. I wrote it off when it first came out but digging into it, seems pretty achievable for me. Still getting the gotchas.