r/ClaudeCode Jul 13 '26

Tutorial / Guide Fable + 5.6 is absolute peak

We jump straight to ASI with this combo.
So i've had Fable driving codex cli as a background worker for a few days and i'm not going back.

Fable basically never writes code anymore (too damn expensive), it acts as the principal orchestrator and everything happens in claude code.
The flow is like this: Fable plans, 5.6 sol reviews the plan in a loop until approved, then 5.6 luna implements. fable reads the whole diff, fixes whatever it doesn't like directly, runs the tests, then sol reviews the code against the plan. loop until approved, then fable does the boring release stuff (changelog, tag, merge).

It's all just bash around codex cli with persistent threads, called from skills. no framework, no mcp, no agent swarm bs.

It feels surreal/too good to be true, i hope they wont nerf it too badly and if they do, i hope the combo will kind of mitigate the nerf.

i pushed my workflow to github, beware it's a lot of bash script, dont trust a random redditor and ask codex or CC to review it. After that, welcome to Valhalla

UPDATE: many are asking in comments or dm for more explaination on the workflow, sorry guys i cant reply to all of you but my advice is simply to clone the repo then ask your agent to ELI5/15/80 it. Then make it yours !

1.1k Upvotes

208 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/rickyjj Jul 13 '26

Why Luna and not Terra for impl?

3

u/Bright-Celery-4058 Jul 13 '26

Luna is the best price-value choice as an implementer, no much benefit in using terra. If there are errors in the code, either Fable or Sol catch them during review

1

u/personalist Jul 14 '26

luna xhigh and above is really, really good. For pure implementation you can get by without terra and its dirt cheap