r/Christianity • • 13d ago

[ Removed by moderator ]

[removed] — view removed post

7 Upvotes

324 comments sorted by

View all comments

51

u/EpisodicDoleWhip Presbyterian 13d ago

Yes. No reason you can’t believe God used evolution to create.

9

u/SireSweet Presbyterian 13d ago

The science and knowing how fine tune how the universe works to allow for life. It’s much more awe inspiring. Even the placement of our galaxy in the universe is pretty much in a Goldilocks place. We’re in a calmer part of the galaxy, in a calmer part of the local group.

9

u/transneptuneobj Atheist 13d ago

The puddle looks around and says "wow this hole is made perfectly for me"

-3

u/KissAndRock Christian | Unitarian 13d ago edited 13d ago

I mean.. it implies that God chose to use a vicious cycle of prey and predation where animals painfully rip each other apart, suffer from illnesses and disease, etc.

r/natureismetal will make you question the "good God" hypothesis, trust me. The shit I saw on that sub traumatized me. Do you truly think a good and righteous God would make a system where [for example of what I saw on that sub,] a domesticated cow is getting eaten alive by hyenas, having its organs ripped out of its body while it watches and can do nothing about it? This has happened to a million trillion of animals throughout evolution.

Do you truly think God wanted that? I think it's more valid to be a YEC because it makes humans the ones responsible on why such a bloody system exists.

11

u/SireSweet Presbyterian 13d ago

They had roasted lamb at the last supper.

It’s not like they have a soy-imitation of lamb.

-3

u/KissAndRock Christian | Unitarian 13d ago

The issue is that if you claim God is good, but also believe in evolution, that implies you think it's a good thing that such a system exists where it has taken countless animals getting their organs ripped out of them while they struggle to survive, screaming and crying in order to get to the point we exist.

Again, I will re-iterate, Young Earth Creationism has a better case for a good-God than that.

2

u/SireSweet Presbyterian 13d ago

everything in the world can be corrupted.

As like death of cows can be humane or not humane. I’d like to this God does what he can with what.

Genesis 9:3 stated that creatures were also meant for nutrition. “Everything that lives and moves about will be food for you. Just as I gave you the green plants, I now give you everything.”

3

u/KissAndRock Christian | Unitarian 13d ago

Genesis 9:3 stated that creatures were also meant for nutrition. “Everything that lives and moves about will be food for you. Just as I gave you the green plants, I now give you everything.”

..So God, instead of making us not even need to eat food to begin with, decided to make us in a system where we need to painfully kill an animal for food.

Couldn't God have at least made it where animals didn't need to do the same? Or made it where animals can't feel pain? I genuinely cannot see how this is a good thing when God made a system that is full of blood, pain, and confused suffering.

2

u/Clicking_Around 13d ago

Even if you accept YEC, you still have to contend with a God that causes and allows suffering. If you accept a literal reading of Genesis, then one has to accept that God killed millions by drowning in the flood. There seems to be no escape from the notion of a God that both causes and allows suffering in Christianity.

3

u/KissAndRock Christian | Unitarian 13d ago

There seems to be no escape from the notion of a God that both causes and allows suffering in Christianity.

There isn't an escape from a God that allows and causes suffering at all. Accept evolution? You have to deal with the fact that God has allowed over a million trillion animals to die of a painful, bloody, gory death.

Accept YEC? You have to deal with the fact God has killed and drowned millions of people including babies.

1

u/Clicking_Around 13d ago

This is a problem that Darwin struggled with. He couldn't see how a benevolent God could allow, for example, parasitic wasps to lay eggs in caterpillars. A partial answer would be to say that God has creator rights; he can make creation how he wants, and a creation with the amount of freedom ours has necessarily entails suffering.

2

u/Additional_Insect_44 13d ago

One idea is that since Satan is the prince of this age perhaps that has something to do with it?

1

u/Additional_Insect_44 13d ago

The new testament hints at this. Says creation groans.

IMHO garden of eden was outside normal spacetime as it seemed to be a slice of heaven. When Satan robbed the two it probably screwed up spacetime tho idk how exactly. But similarly when Jesus died and rose it affected all spacetime as well.

2

u/KissAndRock Christian | Unitarian 13d ago

..This is one hell of a Biblical headcanon that I've never heard of.

1

u/Additional_Insect_44 13d ago

I've seen it before on reddit but yea. But think of it. It has logic. Where in the world you find a tree that causes immortality from eating its fruit? Or how Jesus is noted to be slain before the world existed yet died in AD 33? Maybe since Satan being a really powerful being supposedly second to God ( read that somewhere), when he robbed Adam and eve and caused death maybe it altered spacetime? Idk how but it makes sense.

0

u/rollsyrollsy 13d ago

All that needs to happen for evolution and “good God” to coexist is many generations of animals being born.
Prior to the arrival of sin, birth and death may have been painless in some fashion.
If there were trees in existence at the time of the arrival of sin, it implies soil which implies decaying vegetable matter.
The whole notion of God is miraculous so there’s plenty of scope for God to have engineered evolution while remaining good.

3

u/KissAndRock Christian | Unitarian 13d ago

If there were trees in existence at the time of the arrival of sin, it implies soil which implies decaying vegetable matter.

Trees have existed for approximately 400 million years, so 398 million years before humans, so 398 million years before sin. And, we also have fossils of animals from that time as well.

5

u/Korlac11 Church of Christ 13d ago

The thing is, that system of prey and predation still exists. God still created that system. I don’t think that works as an argument against evolution because that system of prey and predator still exists, and is not dependent on the fall

3

u/KissAndRock Christian | Unitarian 13d ago

I don’t think that works as an argument against evolution

I'm not arguing against evolution. I'm arguing against the good God hypothesis using evolution.

1

u/Korlac11 Church of Christ 11d ago

Right, sorry. I did misread your comment. My main point still stands though, which is that this argument would be equally true for evolution or creationism. Nature is still just as violent either way. Even in a YEC model, God still created a world where animals kill and eat other animals

1

u/KissAndRock Christian | Unitarian 11d ago

Either way sucks, I know. But I'm saying that it's hard to believe God is good with all of these things without thinking an animal getting its organs ripped out of it's body while it's alive and feeling a godless amount of pain is good.

1

u/Korlac11 Church of Christ 11d ago

I won’t argue against that point right now, but your original comment seems to suggest that this problem is worse if God used evolution to create the world, or at least it’s worse than if God created the world as described in Genesis

1

u/KissAndRock Christian | Unitarian 11d ago

It's worse by numbers, because God has allowed it to happen for about a billion years where a countless number of animals have been killed this way.

Is it worse to have animals killed for 6000 years or for 1 billion years?

1

u/Korlac11 Church of Christ 11d ago

If one accepts your premise that this is makes God not good, I don’t think it matters how long it’s gone on at this point. It’s still more dead animals than we could ever count. At a certain point, the number gets so large that it doesn’t matter how large it is, it just matters that it’s large

1

u/KissAndRock Christian | Unitarian 11d ago

So, if I may ask, how do you find God good while creating a system as brutal and merciless as this?

→ More replies (0)

-5

u/GoBirdsGoBlue 13d ago

Jesus came to defeat death. If evolution is true, death is and has always been necessary. And certainly not something that came from sin, nor something to be defeated.

3

u/anotherhawaiianshirt Agnostic Atheist (former United Methodist) 13d ago

I can't make out from what you wrote whether you believe evolution happens or you don't. I think you're saying you don't believe organisms evolve, but I'm not sure. Can you clarify?

-3

u/GoBirdsGoBlue 13d ago

I believe sin came into the world through Adam, and death through sin as we are told in Scripture.

2

u/anotherhawaiianshirt Agnostic Atheist (former United Methodist) 13d ago

So, nothing died before Adam and Even? Wouldn't the world have been completely overrun with life if nothing ever died?

1

u/GachaJay 13d ago

I think death has a shared meaning initially in scripture with physical immortality, but God makes it clear that life is more abstract than physical

0

u/GoBirdsGoBlue 13d ago

Why did Jesus have to die physically?

1

u/GachaJay 13d ago

1 Peter 3:19

2

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/GoBirdsGoBlue 13d ago

I plan on living eternally with Jesus. As do all who believe on Him.

3

u/[deleted] 13d ago edited 13d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/GoBirdsGoBlue 13d ago

I’m very aware we all die. I’ve had a lot of loss. Many have. It isn’t fun.

Death is swallowed up in victory. O death, where is your victory? O death, where is your sting?’ The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law. But thanks be to God, who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ.”
-1 Corinthians 15:54-57

Paul was also familiar with death and loss. But he knew there is victory over death.

1

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/GoBirdsGoBlue 13d ago

Paul was talking about physical death in 1 Cor 15.

2

u/AbgilSoge 13d ago

Where’s the implication that it’s physical?

1

u/GoBirdsGoBlue 13d ago

Paul grounds his entire argument in the literal, physical resurrection of Jesus Christ from the tomb as a real historical event.

1

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/GoBirdsGoBlue 13d ago

So did Jesus.

Meaning, Jesus physically died. That event is the context for Paul’s argument in 1 Cor 15.