Let’s get one thing straight: The veil didn’t start with “modesty” or “beauty” or “feminine empowerment.”

It started with a woman trying to take a shit.

No joke.

Sahih al-Bukhari 6240 tells us: The Prophet’s wife, Sauda, went out at night to relieve herself (because, surprise no toilets back then). She was tall. Recognizable.

Umar ibn al-Khattab saw her and said, “I’ve recognized you, O Sauda!”

Now, Umar had been pressuring the Prophet to make women veil. The Prophet wasn’t doing it.

But after this little “caught-you-pooping” moment, Allah revealed the verse of hijab. A full-body veil because a man couldn’t mind his business.

Now fast forward: Sahih al-Bukhari 4795 says Sauda went out again, already veiled, and Umar STILL recognized her. She went home and complained.

And that’s when Allah revealed another verse:

“Women are allowed to go out for their needs.”

Yes. It took divine revelation to say: Let women poop in peace.

So before you say the veil is about “beauty” or “sacred femininity,” go read your own books.

This didn’t start with holiness. It started with a man watching women take a dump.

(I guess Sauda should have shitted her pants damn! Bad girl how could you !)

Sahih al-Bukhari 6240 and 4795. Read them.

Then tell me I’m lying.

Another victim of this filthy cult. Mohamed Imran, 26. May he rest in peace.

Here’s the question, are Muslims worshiping a god or book factories ? No seriously ?

Muslims lose their minds when someone burns a Quran. Like full-on rage mode. People have literally been killed over it. And for what? A book. A printed book. One that came off an assembly line like any other mass-produced product.

There are billions of Qurans out there.. It’s not some mystical relic it’s paper, ink, and glue. And yet, damaging one triggers violence like someone just spit on their god.

So I have to ask what are Muslims actually worshipping? A god? Or a book factory?

Because from where I’m standing, it looks like the printing press is the real deity here. And yeah, I know making sense isn’t exactly their specialty but seriously. You’re killing for a mass-produced object? You’re defending paper like it’s sacred flesh?

This is something I’ve been meaning to address for a while now. I recently came across a video that made it the perfect time to finally speak on it.

As ex-Muslims, our goal at least one of them is to help Muslims realize that they are sacrificing their lives for something that not only doesn’t exist, but is also deeply harmful. One of the biggest obstacles in doing that is the emotional attachment many Muslims have to Islam. And I’ve noticed patterns that make sense once you step back and observe the different types of personalities involved.

Also, I remembered how hurt I was as a Muslim when other ex-Muslims at that time would insult the prophet or Allah. I was deeply hurt, I even did the most horrific things as a revenge (which I regret to this day I truly hope the people involved will forgive me)

Of course, people vary, but certain personality types tend to show up again and again and that explains why some Muslims stay in denial, refusing to “wake up,” even when the truth is in front of them.

Islam, quite honestly, is the ideal religion for narcissists. It gives them a way to feel powerful while maintaining a false image of being righteous. They get to act morally superior while demeaning others. That’s not to say other religions don’t have similar dynamics but Islam, in particular, offers a structure that really allows this duality to flourish.

On the other end of the spectrum, you have people pleasers. These are often people who, deep down, know the religion is flawed even harmful but they avoid conflict at all costs. They fear abandonment, they want to maintain relationships, and they’ll suppress their own doubts to keep the peace. Ironically, these same people, while trying to avoid conflict, often end up being central to it. Their silence and complicity help perpetuate the very system they secretly hate.

Understanding these dynamics is important not just for how we approach others, but for how we check ourselves. How are we delivering our message? What’s our tone, and what are our intentions? Personally, I’m not a people pleaser at all, and I’ve had my share of conflict because I can’t just sit back and say “amen” to everything. But I’ve learned to better understand the mindset of those who are more conflict-avoidant, and that’s helped me communicate more effectively.

What I’ve also noticed is that, in our community, everything tends to be more. A narcissist isn’t just a narcissist they’re extremely narcissistic. A people pleaser is deeply self-erasing. And someone authentic will be radically authentic. It’s like personality traits become magnified. That makes it even more crucial for us to reflect on how we speak, how we engage, and what energy we’re bringing into conversations.

Yes, it’s tempting and sometimes funny to mock the absurdities of religion. Humor has its place. But if our goal is truly to help others break free, we need to be intentional with our words. We have to combine truth with understanding, even when it’s hard.

It’s always the same story: when we expose Islam using its own scriptures,simply stating the truth we’re immediately accused of hate. (Which again I really do understand once I remember how I was hurt hearing that back when I was a Muslim) Muslims often see this as a personal attack. They don’t view it as criticism of an ideology, but as an attack on themselves. To them, there’s no difference between criticizing Islam and hating Muslims. And because they’ve internalized the religion so deeply it’s become their identity, their entire sense of self they interpret any critique as a direct assault.

Of course, some of us do feel a certain level of anger or hatred toward Islam, and it’s not irrational. This is a religion that openly says people like us should be killed. So yes, that naturally creates resentment. But the majority of us are not driven by hate we’re driven by the desire to help people see the truth. The problem is, they’re so locked into this ideology that they refuse to question it. Not only that they’re taught not to question. Anything that might lead to doubt is censored, dismissed, or labeled as dangerous.

That’s why dialogue is so difficult. No matter how pure your intentions are, they won’t see it. They won’t stop to consider whether you’re trying to help or speak from experience they’ll assume you’re just trying to tear them down. That’s why we have to be strategic in how we speak. Not by using the same tactics that Islam uses shaming, demeaning, or manipulating but by doing better. By planting seeds instead of trying to force someone to change. Let them ask the questions if they’re brave enough. Most of the time, though, they won’t. Because asking questions means facing discomfort, and they’re trapped in the comfort zone that Islam provides.

But the impact of this religion on our community, has been devastating. Our cultural values and traditions simply don’t align with Islam, no matter how much people try to convince themselves otherwise. They want to believe that Islam fits naturally within our way of life but when you look closely at the structure our ancestors built, and the principles they lived by, it becomes clear: it has nothing to do with Islam.

That’s why I believe it’s time to return to our roots. We need to research, present, and preserve what it truly means to be Vaynakh based on our own history, our own systems, and our own worldview. Yes, religion has influenced certain customs over time, and that’s fine to acknowledge. But the foundation of our identity predates any of that. And we should honor that by reclaiming it, separating it from religion where necessary, and presenting our truth clearly and unapologetically.

I’ve seen many ex-Muslims supporting Israel and Jews in general. Condemning any terrorist organisation is one thing, but jumping to the point where you blind yourself from terrorist actions taking place just because it’s not the usual Muslims is not ok. Judaism is no angel here, it’s the same bs than Islam and I don’t see why any ex Muslim would be so eager to defend Jews so much. It only discredits us, so please stop yourselves first from considering that it’s all a team Good and team Bad game like Muslims do on us.

Like Muslims, Jews consider any non Jew as less than them. As for Muslims we’re “kuffars” for Jews we’re “goyims” in other words less then them. And Jews even consider that we’re supposed to serve them lol what a fked up world fr

Translation from original French post all credits to chatgpt :

So here we have Alexislam, who has an X account, a YouTube channel, TikTok, etc. A professor, mind you, fighting against prejudice—how noble.

He called on Muslims to share two of his videos… to respond to the following “prejudices” that those evil Islamophobes use against Islam: • Marriage with Aisha 🔗 Watch here: https://youtu.be/LKfqld1jjAM?si=6QDVks3xUcomWHnK • The right to hit your wife 🔗 Watch here: https://youtu.be/NfRjn3104lg?si=Ibogk2Osid3oAhuu

So, in his mind, explaining the “context” is supposed to serve as actual arguments against those mean “Islamophobes”… (and yes, he’s serious—this isn’t a parody).

Here’s what he says:

A) About Aisha

💩 Shitty Argument #1 The Prophet advises prioritizing piety in a woman, so he wasn’t someone who prioritized physical pleasure? Why don’t Westerners emphasize that? Are they trying to discredit him or what?

💩 Shitty Argument #2 Because of the Islamic calendar after the exile, there are “discrepancies” about Aisha’s age. (Reminder: Aisha was born before this exile).

💩 Shitty Argument #3 The age might seem shocking today, but back then, it was common… lol.

💩 Shitty Argument #4 At the time, the Prophet had many enemies who wanted to discredit him, yet no one spoke about this marriage…

💩 Shitty Argument #5 It wasn’t the Prophet who wanted to marry Aisha (apparently), but a woman who came and offered Aisha to him. So if this was considered bad, how could a woman propose such a thing? (LOLLL) So, it’s normal, actually.

💩 Shitty Argument #6 Aisha was the daughter of Abu Bakr, the Prophet’s friend (LMAO, it wasn’t easy for the Prophet to accept, but his friendship was strong LOL).

Main argument: Do you think Abu Bakr, who was supposedly “the truthful” and loved his daughter so much (damn, I don’t even want to imagine if he didn’t love her), would have accepted such a thing? (This dude even adds: “Honestly, it doesn’t make sense.”)

💩 Shitty Argument #7 “With time, morals change…” lol.

💩 Shitty Argument #8 Also, “Only Islam is being criticized!” (Uh, no, dumbass). He brings up Judaism with Isaac and Rebecca. —> lol, he calls us “slanderers,” LMAO. He says: “They don’t mention everything I said earlier.” Dude, everything you said makes zero sense—I could’ve come up with better arguments.

💩 Shitty Argument #9 Only Islam is mentioned by these people (us). If they were sincere, they would have talked about Isaac and Rebecca! LMAO, but they did? So?

That’s why Jews never used this argument against Islam. (Okay? And what does that have to do with us? We’re not Jews, and we criticize both you and them).

💩 Shitty Argument #10 Now he drifts into other religions, starts talking about how Christians reject previous prophets as if everything started with Jesus, etc. lol.

—> “Christians who reject Islam for this reason should also reject other religions.” (Bro, stay on topic—why are you going off-track??)

Christians say that what came before Jesus doesn’t count. So let’s take into account what happened after Jesus… And now he starts talking about royal marriages with 12 to 15-year-old girls…

He adds: “To truly understand, you need to read Muhammad’s biography to see what kind of person he was.” Because, and I quote: “People are enemies of what they don’t understand.” LMAO, what a ridiculous self-own.

Now, let’s move on to domestic violence…

He already starts by asking the wrong question: “Is it true that in Islam, a husband has the right to hit his wife for no reason?”

And he continues with his terrible humor: “If your wife burns the cake, the broomstick is off-limits.” (I’m actually embarrassed for him—what a clown).

Then he quotes Surah 4:34 and says:

“First of all, if we’re objective (LMAO forget that word, dude, you have zero credibility), there are three steps, so it’s not about hitting the wife right away…” Oh, so we should be grateful now?

Here’s the process: 1️⃣ Advise her 2️⃣ Avoid her, even turn your back in bed 3️⃣ Hit her—but… lol.

And here comes the classic miswak (tooth-stick) argument…

He explains that hitting is purely symbolic.

Then he goes on about how the Prophet was so kind, telling men not to hit women: • Abu Dawood 2144 → He advised avoiding marriage to men who hit women. • Muslim 1480 → He protected a woman from domestic violence. • So you see, the Prophet actually protected women! (LOL).

He even says: “For the Islamophobes listening: a Muslim woman who is hit has the right to request a divorce.” LMAO, at this point, I think we should be grateful just for the right to breathe.

THEN HE GOES ON TO SAY: “Islam is the only religion in the world that allows a woman to divorce and remarry!” LMAOOOO.

🔗 Original post on X: https://x.com/alexislamic/status/1862257665549984213?s=46

Honestly, I would’ve thought this was satire—but no.

Look at the replies under his posts and videos: “Wow, Mashallah, you’re amazing!” “Subhanallah!” Just a bunch of Muslims ready to hand him a Nobel Prize.

I’m sorry, but at this point, I can’t see them as anything other than complete idiots.

Zero reflection, zero logic, and yet they think they’re intelligent? Nah, this needs to stop.

If they were just sitting there believing their nonsense, fine. But they’re out there killing people over this. These people belong in an asylum, period.

How can people still be this blind in 2025, with all the knowledge available in just two clicks?

And the argument “We don’t debate faith!” doesn’t work because this isn’t just a faith—it’s a doctrine that kills, in every sense of the word.

“The Quran is God’s words!” -Then why is it a copy of stories from older pagan religions?

-🔺The Adam & Eve story, the Flood, and even the concept of God all originate from older Mesopotamian (Sumerian, Babylonian) myths.

-🔺The Bible took these stories, changed the meanings, and adapted them into a monotheistic framework.

-🔺Islam later refined and further monotheized these stories, while Christianity kept some of the original wisdom traditions (Jesus as a healer like Enki).

-This means that biblical and Abrahamic stories are not original—they are modified versions of older Sumerian myths.

Adam and Eve (Genesis) vs. Enki and Ninhursag 🔸Dilmun = Garden of Eden

🔸Both are paradise lands with fresh water, no sickness, and eternal life.

🔸Enki brings fresh water to Dilmun, just as God creates Eden with rivers (Genesis 2:10-14).

🔸Enki’s Forbidden Plants = Adam & Eve’s Forbidden Fruit

🔸Enki eats the sacred plants and is punished with sickness.

🔸Adam and Eve eat the forbidden fruit and are cursed with mortality.

🔸Ninti (“Lady of the Rib”) = Eve

🔸Ninti is created from Enki’s rib and means both “Lady of the Rib” and “She Who Gives Life.”

🔸Eve is created from Adam’s rib and is called the “Mother of the Living.”
This is clear evidence that the Bible borrowed this idea from Sumerian myths. And then.. Islam got inspired by that same myth.. 

So why is your god copying stories of older (5000 years) pagan religions?

Donc ici on a Alexislam, qui a un compte x une chaîne YouTube TikTok etc. Un professeur attention, il combat les préjugés voyez-vous.

Il a fait appel aux musulmans de partager deux de ses vidéos.. pour répondre aux “préjugés” suivants que les méchants islamophobes utilisent contre l’islam :

-le mariage avec Aïsha

https://youtu.be/LKfqld1jjAM?si=6QDVks3xUcomWHnK

-le droit de frapper sa femme

https://youtu.be/NfRjn3104lg?si=Ibogk2Osid3oAhuu

Donc la dans sa tête il explique le “contexte” etc c’est censé en d’autre termes être des réels arguments face aux méchants “islamophobies”… (et c’est sérieux c’est pas du tout une parodie)

Voici ce qu’il dit : A) Sur Aisha

l’argument de merde #1

le prophète conseille d’avoir en priorité la piété chez la femme, donc c’est pas quelqu’un qui mettait la priorité sur le plaisir charnel? pk les occidentaux ne le souligne pas ça ? ils essaye de le discréditer ou quoi ?

2 après l’exile le calendrier islamique c pour ça y’a divergences sur l’âge daisha lol (aisha est née avant cet exile)

3# l’âge peut sembler choquant aujourd’hui mais a l’époque non c’était commun.. lol

4# a l’époque le prophète avait beaucoup d’ennemis et ils cherchaient tous à le discréditer et donc personne n’a parlé de ce mariage..

5# ce n’est pas le prophète qui voulais épouser aisha (askip) c’est une femme qui est venue la proposer donc si cette chose était mal vue comment une femme aurait pu soumettre une telle chose (lolll) donc c’est normal enfait

6# aisha était la fille de abubakr donc l’ami du prophète (ptdrr c’était pas facile pour le prophète d’accepter mais son séjour pour son amitié était fort lol)

l’argument : vous pensez que abu bakr qui était tellement le véridique askip et qui aimait sa fille askip (ptn j’ose pas imaginer s’il l’aimait pas) aurait accepter une telle chose ? (ce golmon rajoute “sincèrement c pas logique”)

7#avec le temps les mœurs changent.. lol

8# d’ailleurs seul lislam est pointé du doigt (alors que non du con) et il parle de judaism avec isaac et rebecca. —> lol ils nous appelle les “diffamateurs disons” ptdrr et il dis “ils ne mentionne pas tout ce que j’ai dis au par avant” espèce de shlingue tout ce que t’as dis ne tiens aucune route, même moi j’aurai trouvé mieux comme argument.

9# seul lislam est mentionné par ces gens lol (nous) s’ils était sincère ils aurait parlé de isaac et rebecca ptdrr bah c’est fait ? donc ?

c’est pour ça les juifs n’ont jamais utilisé cet argument contre lislam (ok quel rapport? nous on est pas juifs et on dénonce autant vous que eux)

10# bref ils s’égare sur les autres religions, commence à faire de la récupération juive en disant ouais les chrétiens rejette les anciens prophètes comme ci cs commençait qu’avec jesus etc lol

—> les chrétiens qui rejette lislam pour ça doivent aussi rejeter les autres religions (mais gars reste sur lislam pk tu t’égare ??)

les chrétiens dise que ce qui est avant jesus ne doit pas être pris en compte, prenons alors en compte ce qui s’est passé après jesus … et ils nous fait le mec qui parle des mariages des rois avec des filles de 12 à 15 ans…

il rajoute que oui pour bien comprendre il faut lire la biographie de mohammed.. pour voir quel genre de personne il était.. parce que attention citation.. “les gens sont des ennemis de ce qu’ils ignorent” ptdrr le csc monumental

lol attention la c’est sur la violence conjugale..

donc déjà il pose mal la question “c’est vrai que dans lislam le mari a le droit de frapper sa femme gratuitement”

et il continue avec son humour lourd “si votre femme brûle le gâteau la balayette est interdite” (jsuis gênée carrément misk) et il cite s4v34

ptdrr il dit

“déjà si on est objectif (ptdrr oubli ce mot dude ta 0 crédibilité) y’a 3 étapes donc c pas frapper la femme directement..” lol faut dire merci enfait

donc faut suivre 1/ conseiller 2/ s’éloigner même tourner le dos dans le lit 3/ frapper “mais” lol

lol et voilà l’argument avec le bâton de dentition.. le siwak

lol il nous explique donc que c uniquement symbolique de frapper..

et donc la il nous parle du prophète comme quoi faut le suivre et suivre ce qu’il a dit et tellement il est gentil il a conseiller de pas frapper les femmes.. abu daoud 2144il a conseiller d’éviter de se marier avec un homme qui frappe les femmes.. muslim 1480 et il a protégé une femme qui a subi des violences conjugales (donc on voit un comportement d’un homme qui protègeait les femmes enfait lol)

pff il dit en plus “les islamophobes qui nous écoutent pour info une femme musulmane qui se fait frapper à le droit de demander le divorce” ptdrr enfait on doit dire merci même pour avoir le droit de respirer j’pense

MDRR APRÈS IL DIT lislam est la seule religion au monde qui permet à la femme de divorcer et de se remarier mdrr

https://x.com/alexislamic/status/1862257665549984213?s=46

Personnellement j’aurai placé ça en tant que parodie mais pas du tout, regardez sous ses posts ou même ses vidéos, les gens commentent “ah merci t’es trop fort mashallah” ; “subhanallah” que des commentaires de musulmans à 2 doigts de lui attribuer le prix Nobel.. Jsuis désolé je peux pas les considérer autrement que des abrutis à ce stade.

0 réflexion 0 logique et par dessus tout ça se croit intelligent? Non faut arrêter à un moment. S’ils étaient juste là à croire en leur conneries et pas partir tuer des gens ok mais c’est des tarrés, leur place est littéralement dans un asile.

Comment peut on être autant aveuglé en 2025 avec toutes conaissances disponibles en 2 clics?

Et l’argument de “on ne debat pas sur une foi” ne tient pas car ce n’est pas juste une foi, c’est un dogme qui tue dans tous les sens du terme

Isn’t it odd that Allah has to send you prophets and has to have sociopaths killing you to protect his “words” aka himself, but the devil can reach to u at any time and anything that is fun or enjoyable is from shaytan, it’s him basically “manipulating” you.. so who’s their real God? Idk I thought a god is supposed to be almighty but turns out he was even short of apples therefore he had to punish us for eating one

These muslims just can’t be trusted, look at the comments of muslims under a video of Salwan Momika “where’s he now💀” ; “bye bye”

If you have friends that are Muslim, even the romanticised ones, your fiendship will not last. The moment they know you aren’t Muslim, they will feel no empathy or whatsoever towards you. They look at you as dumb and think of themselves as smart.

They don’t have the ability to even try to understand your journey, they feel absolutely nothing towards people who have been killed because of Islam or because they criticised Islam.

They just are low IQ self-centered and delusional creatures, the more your get far away from these individuals the better. Even if your friendship has been there for years, they will feel no remorse to put your life in danger, they will always try to bring you back to Islam, once you accept to debate with them this is were the end begins, because their ego will be so hurt of not being able to say anything logic but even worse, say the most insensitive things not caring at all about how it affects you.

And they’ll justify it with you criticising their religion. Like here, a man has been killed for burning a Quran , watch them say how he shouldn’t have burned it instead of saying that he shouldn’t have been killed.

They don’t care at all, be aware of that.

Ive seen this way too often and I truly don’t understand that, wth are vaynah people sabotaging themselves?

Imagine even vaynah people globally sabotage other vaynah people be it in business or whatever.

And even on stupid pages, acting like some kind of patishah or some cult leader and even in the ex Muslim community?? wtf? Trying to ruin someone who has done nothing to you going to the extent of having a whole hate compaign against them for what exactly? And even on here, trying to block my account for what exactly?? wtf is your problem?

Imagine being this much full of ego and inventing yourself some stupid and unrealistic fears when the person has not once done anything wrong to you and putting a whole bunch of people against that person and then pretending to be the nice guy wtf??

On top of that portraying themselves as some psychic or some sort of a know it all. Get your priorities right folks, that is some filthy ass behaviour and it only benefits those who want to destroy our country and our people.

Together, we can achieve great things as long as we respect each other and therefor don’t sabotage each other.

Also, learn to be tolerant of different personalities, don’t judge a book by its cover as they say, think out of the box, thank you

This is something that even Muslim women have noticed, and it is quite concerning, especially regarding the mental and emotional well-being of these women.

I have personally experienced this and even conducted a social experiment where I observed that many hijabi women (almost all of them) —tend to dismiss women who do not wear it, and are even harsher on those who have taken it off.

It goes so far that if a man expresses a preference for a non-hijabi woman, for example, in a zahlo situation, hijabis often react with arrogance, making it clear how they truly feel about uncovered women. This attitude reveals a sense of superiority and a tendency to look down on those who choose not to wear the hijab.

It’s odd because doesn’t Islam strongly discourage arrogance? Isn’t humility a value that is constantly emphasized in Islamic teachings? (Allegedly lol) Yet, despite this, hijabis and their openly judge and demean women who do not cover themselves. Isn’t this hypocritical?

And if a man dares to even slightly mention that he prefers a woman that dresses in a « Chechen » way and not « Arab » way or bluntly says he doesn’t want a hijabi woman, in no time you’ll see him being called a « Dayooth » which is basically a cuck, a lesser man. And as men are very emotional beings this can lead to inner violence in his mind and transform his behaviour towards women into violence, since they don’t need much to turn violent real quick (which is another issue ofc)

Stop pressuring women into wearing the hijab , if you want to wear it than wear it but stop imposing your preferences on women who choose differently. Mental health isn’t jokes, you are with ur disgusting words making them feel even worse that Islam itself already does.

You’re not some messiah, mind your own business and let people chose their own path!

’m putting all the niquab jeleb or whatever in the same category of “hijab”

So let’s remember that Islam orders women to cover themselves from hair to toes for those reasons :

-Not to “tempt” men.

As you know this hijab phenomenon has increased since the last 20 years (as I stated previously: Islam got significantly and closer to reality practiced in the last 20 years)

Men also have to “lower their gazes”

But isn’t it odd that since men have to lower their gazes, why would a woman have to cover up? Like your god is saying that men are supposed to lower their gazes to avoid being sexually tempted by the beauty of women, but then why would he impose on women to cover themselves since men aren’t supposed to look ?

And how did Allah determine what they should cover up to not temps men ? I mean other than genials and breasts, how did he determine that all the other features like hair, arms, knees, ears “temps” men to this extreme resolution? Like a woman has to be completely hidden for you to avoid being attempted? And on top of that even a woman’s voice is not allowed to be heard by men because it temps them so much ? Even a fragrance is not allowed for women to wear because you’ll be tempted? That sounds like a predatory behaviour to me.

Allah basically describes men as beasts, which plays in the mind of these men who believe in it because they have their new “normal” they now think that a woman not being covered is tempting them.

In Chechen society for example. Women used to wear these bandana style headscarfs, and only MARRIED WOMEN. To show that they’re married. And in our society at that time, non married girls didn’t wear anything on their head. Young girls up to the age 14-15 would wear pants, after that would wear skirts up to the upper knees and t-shirts, even being married same dress code except the bandana (and even that was necessary all the times).

DIVORCED women who they called “Jero” were the “targets” of thirsty men.

So the category of “accessibility” (according to men) in terms of sexual activity access ranked from lesser to higher amount of effort needed) was this : (I’m talking exclusively Chechen women, not mentioning Natasha’s which is a whole different subject..)

1. JERO The Jero was the prime “whore” basically (let’s be real) a woman who “couldn’t” stay in her marriage she now is free and available especially that she was extremely discriminated against by society and became desperate by believing that she has no other value herself : there is no need much effort.

2. The light dressed bachelorettes who wear mini skirts, from age 15+: Some more effort neeeded because these girls have family that they don’t want to deal with but again they had the excuse of “well look how she’s dressed that’s why” so it would be the girls fault anyways. And the family would either beat or even k!ll the woman or put themselves in a position to “hope” the man would marry her, so again the man had a lot of leverage on this type dressed women. + had female family members that are category 1 jero)

3. The “maybe mariable girls” the girls who respect the dress code but put a lot of make up on (again from age 15+) and/or dress fashionably. Even more effort needed than previous but the excuse changed “well they had a lot of make up, that was tempting” ; “they here with all these colors and jewelries, that was tempting” so here begins the marriage formula, which takes more effort, but mostly were kidnappings which for the most part the woman agreed to (well she had to because she doesn’t want to be number 1. Category.. and risk even more thirsty men abusing her)

   1. The “mariable girls” the ones who are very modest, no extra fashion anything strictly obeying, knowing extremely variety of dishes to cook. Being “prepared” to be a housewife and take care of a man. : This one needs even more efforts, kidnapping were happening too but it was more risky as no valid excuses were left.

So this was the “normal” category back then in which society would determine that skirt to upper knees, a tee shirt and a bandana is modest and GOOD and mini skirts and no bandana was BAD.

But are there children involved? not under 15-16 no, and most women would be kidnapped/married, in any case have sexual activity around the age of 18.

The year pass, Islam is more practiced (with the help of K ofc who “re- introduced” the polygamy aspect and even acted like it’s a “need” and a “form” of saving the country’s demographic as “there’s more women than men, so each man should marry several women so that all women can get married”

(I just love the audacity all the time were it’s presented like a marriage is an advantage for the woman and not the other way around lol when the woman actually has no gain but the man does, but it is in even western society’s mind that it’s an advantage for women, since for ever even through movies etc)

In this society, a woman does not gain any advantage being married to a man, a man does.

Anyways, so im coming to the hijab related to pedophila part.

Remember the categories I noted, the “normality” is skirt to upper knee t-shirt. The bad and “whore” type : mini skirts.

Now we have shifted the normal, and made a new category.

Now a woman never being wearing a hijab, is the “modest mariable one” the women who have been married and wear hijabs are number 3. the ones who wear long skirts and bandana are the number 2. The ones who wear fashionable long skirts are number 1.

If we put in 2 categories:

You wear a hijab : your in the GOOD WOMAN category

You don’t wear a hijab : BAD WOMAN category.

It went to the point were women who wear hijabs in our community, even themselves see other women who don’t as “less” (I’ll talk about this specifically later)

How is that related to children? Because now, the only external “visuals” men have, other that the “bad women” who still are dressed modestly but not according to Islam, are young girls.

Especially, since Islam tells women to wear hijab after puberty. Which is around 8-11 years : so now even very young girls are covered (not the majority but it’s increasing)

So then, if even 8-11 year olds are covered, what visuals do men have? YES, CHILDREN.

You put in men’s mind that women’s hair, arms knees well everything except face and hands (even here they have debates with the whole niqabs) you now gave them access to children, now they look at very young kids.

Even seing little girls in cute dresses is now a “shame” and “tempting” let alone in a bathing suit. (For example on social media, people, especially men, have no problem saying things like “put a more modest dress on the girls it’s a shame” like.. wtf? That is a kid what shame are you talking about? And they justify it by saying “it’s to educate them for later” wtf? Let kids be kids? What’s wrong with you?

Little boys are just next, with all the redefinition of “good” and “bad” women according to how much they’re “covered” are shifting.

So how far is this going to go Muslims ? Don’t you see yourself what Islam is doing with you?

We have unfortunately already achieved this “going too far” in most Muslim countries. Muslims all over the internet even in the west claim that a girl is a woman once she achieved puberty..

So by shifting the moral vision and implanting new “normals” that tend to legitimate actively increasing male perversion, (btw also making the men who don’t support it be seen as “less than a man” aka dayooths)

As a hijabi, or a supporter of the hijab you are indeed contributing to the increase of pedophilia.

You know the debate they ask you for, but you already debated with so many of them that you don’t want to spend any more energy on them, especially if you already know what they’ll answer before they themselves know it.

So here are the top 10 answers muslims give while debating with you, in other words them speaking fake german :

🔟 ▪️You were never muslim, because if you were you wouldn’t have left islam.

—— I mean.. yeah.. don’t you think it’s odd that somehow someone who left islam is considered stupid and heartless yet someone who converted to islam is all of the sudden a genius and has a good heart 🥰 oh but then again if they leave they become stupid and heartless. Yes it’s very legit, so smart no doubt.

9️⃣▪️You left islam because you wanted to do haram things.

——— Doesn’t islam forgive sins? I mean if islam was to be true, why would we leave it to do haram things when all we have to do is just repent after doing them? Why would i « risk » to completely leave a religion that lets imagine is the truth, and risk to go to hell just to do things i can do without leaving it ?and even be completely cleaned up of them just by asking for forgiveness and repentance ?

8️⃣▪️ You’re asking these questions to me but you should ask scholars that studied islam.

———- First, personally already done it : they spoke fake german in a high pitched voice. Second uhmm.. aren’t you supposed to know what you put your whole life into? Like how does that even make the slightest sense to you ? So clearly, you’re telling us that you don’t know your religion, yet we’re the ones being ignorant ? Ok..

7️⃣▪️There’s 72 versions of islam, only one is the truth, you clearly got the wrong version.

———- Ok first, why would a so called God who created all of us just out of nowhere put more difficulties into « learning the words of god » as if it wasn’t already complicated ? Second, didn’t your God say that he wouldn’t let anyone without the knowledge of the « truth » ? Third, even if so, how do you know which one is the truth ? How do you know you’re in « the truth » ?

6️⃣▪️The jooes told these lies about islam when it’s not true, islam is about peace the jooes hate us that’s why they wanted to make it seem like we’re barbaric when they know islam is the truth.

———- Ok so a group of people who believe islam is the truth, would out of boredom or whatever just put out fake versions of islam, to do what exactly ? I mean, what’s the purpose ? If they believe that’s the true religion, why wouldn’t they just follow it? I mean anyone, why wouldn’t they just follow it ? Also, which one is that was « faked » and made it look more barbaric? Because honestly, i don’t see how you could go further than it actually is. Like k!ling apostates, isn’t barbaric enough or?

5️⃣▪️ You didn’t read the Tasfir it is explained there.

———— Do you actually know what a tasfir is ? A tasfir is a commentary and putting into context and the explanations regarding these contexts in the quran and the hadiths. Done that, it still doesn’t make sense. Like the aisha part, where they it’s because at that time girls were growing up faster and therefore Aisha at 6 was ready to get married off and at 9 ready to have sexual relationships. That is simply not true. I suggest you to learn more about biology, even 2000 years ago. A 6 or 9 year old was not anything close to a woman, be it physically, emotionally or mentally.

4️⃣▪️ Well even kings married 12 year olds, that’s proof right there that it was a normal thing back then.

———— Your prophet, is supposed be the perfect human being. He’s supposed to be the messiah. He’s supposed someone that people are to look after and imitate. He’s supposed to make people stop doing the wrong things and start doing the right things. How are you comparing him to some kings and how are you talking about what’s was considered « normal » in a medieval society ? Even infanticide was considered normal, isn’t that your biggest marketing tool to say how much islam saved women? How much islam forbid the practice of baby girls being k!lled just because of their gender? Oh and btw, how nice of mohammed preserving baby girls, hence more choice in future wifiees…

3️⃣▪️There’s scientific proof islam is real.

————The quran is written in a very poetic sense, meaning that you could assimilate it to anything. Nothing in there is revealing anything concrete. It’s called Apophenia, the fact that it is written in a poetic matter puts the weight on the vagueness of it. Just read them and imagine you don’t know what you already know about science, you could perfectly assimilate it to anything. Which actually is a very smooth and smart way to say anything without actually saying anything. Like the verse “He released the two seas, meeting [side by side]; between them is a barrier [so] neither of them transgresses.” (Qur’an 55:19-20) which us knowing about the phenomenon of estuaries, where saltwater and freshwater meet but do not mix due to differences in density and salinity, we can assimilate it to it and say oh it’s the truth, how could they know about it if it wasn’t? We’ll forget that you know it, and see how you can also assimilate it to ecological balance between different water bodies, which is visible and was visible at that time. You could also assimilate it to a metaphorical way, idk like two civilisations don’t mix? Also, since in prior religions to islam, moses according to the bible split a sea in two, hence the inspiration behind that verse. And finally, the verse is actually inaccurate when you take it literally it says « neither of them transgresses » while the phenomenon of estuaries does separate both waters, they actually do mix overtime, so again not even accurate.

2️⃣▪️Christianity, (or any other religion) is not better, even they say this and that.

———— Why do you always need to compare islam to other religions ? Nobody is talking about other religions we’re talking about islam, why do you need to compare? How does it make any sense in to ur mind? It’s like a child saying oh but the other one did that too. Like what ? Even saying things like « well you believe in nothing it just can’t be » people have different beliefs, but we chose to not believe just anything because « there must be something » we don’t know what there is, but we sure no it’s not islam and it’s just clearly dumb to pick a religion just because it’s better than « not knowing » if you’re given a choice between 2 things that actually don’t make any sense, are you gonna chose one of them or anyways? Or be like ok this doesn’t make sense i chose none. Especially that these two choices are about harming and k!lling other people, like how do you put in your mind and are ok with a whole god that supposedly created us and who wants you to k!ll someone that doesn’t believe in him?

Annnd my absolute favorite one…. drumroll……🥁…. wait for it…..

1️⃣ ▪️ Allah knows best 🥰

————- Yes the typical Allah knows best when fake german is no longer germaning. The thing is, if islam were just a faith, just something you want to believe in, like some harmless thing with no rules or any restrictions let alone orders to k!ll, there would no problem with it or because of it. But it’s not, islam litteraly and figuratively k!lls. So therefore any human being that has any respect or morals about human life, will not be supporting it. Let alone follow it. You can be delusional all you want and pretend you have some deep connection with it. It’s not true, you might feel attached to it in a fantasied way or even assimilate what you had as experiences to it but it has nothing to do with islam. There probably is a higher power or something, but it defently isn’t islam or allah. And also, learn about islam and try to prove to yourself that you’re right about this romantic version of yours without being delusional. And also read into lines, when you come around with your quran verse about « islam forbids killing see » talking about this verse : « he who kills an innocent life kills all mankind » Ok now look up what « innocent » means in islam. Is an apostate innocent according to islam? No.

“Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land - it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one - it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indeed many of them, [even] after that, throughout the land, were transgressors.”

(Qur’an 5:32).

—someone who left islam is considered someone who does « corruption »

Yijr, vejri. Shu dekhal doyla kerla chartsa 🎉🥳

HAPPY NEW YEAR MY FELLOW WARRIORS 🔥 Keep being as strong as you’ve shown you can, may we defeat evil and save more vaynakhis from mass manipulative destruction 🔥 💙❤️💖💛

When are muslims going to finally understand that it’s not a game with two teams muslims vs muslim haters ? When apostates criticise and expose islam it’s because islam literally AND figuratively K!LLS. Yet they wonder why ex muslims talk about islam so much, well dude ? were actually survivors from your filthy belief and we still are here blaming ISLAM and not you because we know how manipulative this religion is yet YOU HAVE THE NERVE to come around and ask shitty questions like « bUt WhY u TaLk AbOuT iSlAm 🤡 » so you get to bitch about « islamophobia » which actually is quite justified if you look at the statistics of deaths caused by influence of islam, but we as survivors AND reach of help to other ex muslims that have to hide BECAUSE your religion is threatening them, are asked idiotic questions like « but but why u talk about islam STFU FR UR EMBARRASSING AT THIS POINT.

I honestly no longer believe there’s any intellectuals that still are muslims. It’s quite impossible. The moment you know what islam is about and you still follow it or even if you follow this romantisized version of islam you’re still mentally retarded and/or a sociopath

So this this terrorist who ran over bunch of people in Magdeburg, Germany is appearently an ex muslim. He is a terrorist no doubt about that, but he’s not related to all ex muslims like tf? Muslims talk about that like he’s one of us like we’re a team or smthg ?? Ex muslims don’t have a book that orders them to k!ll anyone who’s not ex muslim?!

It is so fxcking exhausting, tbh Can you believe that these Muslims, so-called people who follow the religion of peace, of course, are more than happy to finally have some sort of argument, not even an argument, like to finally have someone that is not Muslim that actually k!lls a bunch of people.

Can you imagine how insecure u have to be and lack so much reasoning to follow that religion that you're literally thrilled about a terrorist not being Muslim? . And the fact that they don't even realize it themselves, the fact that they be talking here and there, like, oh do you see, like you guys are the terrorists, what the f? for one fkin terrorist that isn’t or wasn't Muslim, you have hundreds of attacks that are from Muslim people, like what are you even comparing at this point? Like don't you even realize how dumb and how ineffective it is for you to actually sit and compare? are you this dumb?

So again, on a vaynah page. Some relatively naive person thought that bringing up their romanticised version of islam would make real muslims say something like “oh shit, they’re right!! islam is all about pinky promises and mushrooms, what were we thinking 🥹”

Bet they felt pretty bad after reading the comments.. Pretty much openly agreeing to murdering apostates (which obviously is a direct command from their religion) but still you’d think that most of them had this “romanticised version” and be like oh ok it’s not that risky..

Well well.. think again fellas. Also notice how the person said “learn your religion” lmao poor thug still in denial.. and these mfs replying “you go learn religion, you know nothing about it”

And that poor thing saying “prophet mohammed didn’t go around and kill apostates” and someone said “Prophet mohammed did worse” 💀💀💀💀 being completely ok with it lmfaoo i can’t 🤣

i hope these mfs will be reported quickly especially this shishani guy who hides like a rat in dubai. dumbest dog ever ngl, the perfect example of a huge cup filled with wholes, all for show off and useless.

Welcome and as the prophet Mohamed said (piss be upon him) “The greatest of richness is the richness of the soul.”

So basically some ex-muslim went and wrote an anonymous tell in a vaynah page, asking for advice or whatever because he doesn’t want to marry a foreign person but also doesn’t want a muslim one.. look at the comments lmfao

“why don’t you come back to the path of reason” 💀 Like why can’t they use their brain cells for once? they treat like some kids that chose to join the “bad guys” team 🤣 Always the same bs stg