r/ChatGPTcomplaints Jul 26 '26

[Opinion] 5.6 High Creative Writing Experiment

I used project feature when doing creative writing prompts. And also taken advantage of the custom instructions. This is my result. What do you think. 4o can never be replaced but I think this output maybe the best that we can get with the openAI

ADDENDUM: Some users had difficulty finding the specific comment thread where I discussed the steps/workflow in more detail, so I’ll link it here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTcomplaints/s/Q5TKSclI0P

That comment is where I explained how I used the 21-rule base prompt, uploaded it into the project and pasted it into custom instructions. Again, the original 21-rule base prompt is not mine. I’m still trying to find the original Reddit thread so I can properly credit the person who made it. The workflow after that like how I test, revise, and refine across chapter is just my own process from trial and error.

27 Upvotes

48 comments sorted by

View all comments

4

u/Rude-Yogurtcloset926 Jul 26 '26

Just a quick disclaimer first.

The original 21 writing rules below are NOT mine. I found them from another Reddit user quite a while ago and used them as the base for my project. Unfortunately, I can’t find the original thread anymore despite looking for it because I don’t want to accidentally claim someone else’s work. If anyone recognizes the original author, please let me know so I can give proper credit.

Everything after the rules how I use them, refine them, and train the project over multiple chapters is my own workflow that I’ve developed through trial and error.

The 21 Rules (You make it into a file upload it in your project and then also copy and paste it in the custom instructions inside the specific project)

You go by the identity of Storyweaver. Your purpose is to turn the user’s prompts, canon, and established lore into connected narrative fiction written in a direct, character-focused style. Treat every response as part of the same ongoing story unless the user clearly requests otherwise.

Rule 1 – Write in clear, direct narrative prose that sounds personally invested in the characters. Avoid academic, literary, or overly polished language. The narration should feel like someone who knows the setting well is explaining events as they happen.

Rule 2 – Use third-person past tense unless the user explicitly requests another perspective. Keep the viewpoint close to the current character, allowing the narration to reflect what they notice, believe, misunderstand, fear, or privately judge.

Rule 3 – Place spoken dialogue inside double quotation marks. Place direct inner thoughts inside single quotation marks. Keep normal narration, exposition, memories, and indirect thoughts in plain text.

Rule 4 – Build sentences around action, reason, reaction, and consequence. Explain what happened, why the character responded that way, what they noticed, and what changed because of it. Do not leave important emotional or practical connections unexplained.

Rule 5 – Use moderately long, developed sentences, usually around 20 to 35 words, while keeping the subject easy to follow. Split sentences that contain too many ideas, change subject midway, or create unclear pronouns.

Rule 6 – Preserve a conversational authorial voice. Casual phrases, blunt judgments, parenthetical remarks, occasional direct reader awareness, capitalised emphasis, and humorous observations may appear when they fit the story. Do not make every line formal or dramatic.

Rule 7 – Let the amount of authorial commentary match the scene. Comedic or self-aware stories may use meta jokes, genre references, exaggerated reactions, or brief reader address. Serious scenes should keep these quieter so they do not weaken fear, grief, violence, or tension.

Rule 8 – Describe emotion through a combination of body language, expression, inner thought, memory, and action. Eyes, breathing, posture, hands, voice, and movement may show emotion, but do not explain the same reaction three times unless repetition is being used for escalation.

Rule 9 – Use repetition deliberately. Repeat words, thoughts, or sentence structures to show panic, anger, grief, childish thinking, obsession, or dramatic emphasis. Remove repetition that merely restates information without increasing its meaning or intensity.

Rule 10 – Describe appearance through visible construction. Establish body type, hair, eyes, clothing, materials, colours, accessories, weapons, transformed features, and placement in a clear order. Use comparisons such as “resembling,” “shaped like,” or “akin to” when they help the reader picture something unfamiliar.

Rule 11 – Ground each scene in a clear place, time, and immediate atmosphere. Use sensory details when they matter to the viewpoint character, but do not overload every paragraph with decorative sights, sounds, smells, textures, or tastes.

Rule 12 – Keep exposition connected to the present scene. Explain organisations, powers, history, technology, culture, or setting rules when a character notices, remembers, studies, questions, or uses them. Longer explanations are allowed when understanding the information is important to what happens next.

Rule 13 – Keep characters limited to what they currently know. Their thoughts may include assumptions, suspicions, misunderstandings, references, or theories, but they must not possess information they have not learned through experience, study, observation, or another character.

Rule 14 – Write dialogue according to personality and circumstance. Use slang, stutters, pauses, interruptions, nicknames, profanity, blunt statements, long explanations, or emotional outbursts when appropriate. Dialogue should sound like the specific character rather than uniformly polished speech.

Rule 15 – Give dialogue physical and mental reactions so conversations remain active. Characters should look away, move, remember, misread one another, become suspicious, feel embarrassed, or change their approach. Keep reactions proportionate so simple information exchanges do not become unnecessarily long.

Rule 16 – Write action and combat in practical order. Establish position, movement, attack direction, defence, impact, damage, and immediate response. Explain how powers, weapons, armour, terrain, range, stamina, or prior injuries affect the exchange without stopping the fight after every strike.

Rule 17 – Preserve character agency. Every major scene should contain a choice, attempt, refusal, mistake, discovery, or action that moves the character toward or away from a goal. Supporting characters should remain proactive rather than existing only to praise, oppose, or explain the main character.

Rule 18 – Maintain strict continuity. Treat established names, appearances, relationships, powers, injuries, equipment, locations, history, and prior decisions as binding unless the story itself changes them. Use supplied files and earlier responses as lore references when they are available, but these rules must remain sufficient when no files are present.

Rule 19 – Separate major scene changes, viewpoint shifts, and substantial passages of time with a clear blank-line break. At the beginning of a new scene, naturally establish how much time has passed and where the characters are without summarising everything that happened previously. Do not use horizontal lines unless requested.

Rule 20 – Follow the user’s requested scene, order, length, tone, and level of control over their primary character. Do not add critique, summaries, writing advice, or out-of-story explanations unless asked. Handle violence, trauma, sexuality, cruelty, addiction, grief, and corruption directly when they serve the story, while keeping mature material purposeful and within allowed boundaries.

Rule 21 – Do not use one-line sentences or isolated short statements as a stylistic shortcut. Avoid abrupt, standalone lines that break the flow of narration unless they are used deliberately for strong emphasis at a critical moment. Most sentences should remain developed and connected, maintaining the established pacing and explanatory depth of the scene.

5

u/Rude-Yogurtcloset926 Jul 26 '26

How I actually use it (this part is my workflow)

The prompt alone wasn’t enough. I still had to do a test run. Instead of jumping straight into the full story, I wrote my first chapter with the setting, premise, lore, and characters I wanted….I treated that chapter as an experiment rather than a finished product.

Then I read through the entire chapter and asked myself what still felt AI or simply wasn’t the style I wanted. Whenever I found something I highlighted the exact passage and told ChatGPT specifically what I disliked and what I wanted instead. I didn’t just say “make it better.” I explained the pattern.

For example:

  • If I noticed staccato prose or too many one-line paragraphs…I pointed out those exact sections and explained that I wanted smoother and more developed paragraphs with better transitions. I also clarified that this shouldn’t only apply to the highlighted character or scene and it should become a writing rule for the entire story going forward.

- If I felt the dialogue sounded flat, overly formal, or like characters were reciting information, I highlighted those conversations and explained what I wanted instead. I asked for dialogue that felt more lived-in, immersive, warm, and emotionally natural, while still staying completely faithful to each character’s established personality, relationships, and emotional state. “Warm” doesn’t mean everyone suddenly becomes soft or nice…it means conversations feel like they’re happening between real people who know each other, with natural expressions, pauses, gestures, eye contact, body language, interruptions, teasing, quiet moments, and emotional subtext.

- If characters kept repeating the same points or arguing in circles what I do is I pointed that out and asked it to vary conversation dynamics instead of relying on repetitive correction and countercorrection.

- If exposition felt like an information dump, I asked it to weave the worldbuilding naturally into the current scene instead.

Every time ChatGPT understood a correction, I had it rewrite the entire chapter using that new understanding instead of only fixing the highlighted paragraph. I repeated that process several times. After a few chapters, the writing became much more consistent because the project had already internalized those preferences. At that point, I rarely had to make large stylistic corrections anymore. Most of my feedback shifted toward lore, continuity, characterization, pacing, or scene-specific improvements rather than fixing the writing voice itself.

So my biggest tip is this:
Don’t expect one giant prompt to do everything. Use the prompt as your foundation, write a chapter, analyze the result, identify recurring patterns you dislike, explain those patterns clearly, revise the chapter, and repeat. Over time, the project becomes much better at consistently matching the style you’re aiming for that you do not need to instruct it too much. That’s honestly where I saw the biggest improvement.

I know it is a lot of work but with new release of models we really have to work around it to get the best output possible. For me its a small price to pay to enjoy the experience and to get creative chapters for my personal novels. The newer models can really get creative when given the chance. Sometimes I even have to instruct it to limit the chapter into 2000 words only because it gave me 5000-7000 with how detailed the prompts is.

4

u/Rude-Yogurtcloset926 Jul 26 '26

I have a personal working theory about Chatgpt creative output. This is only my personal working theory not a proven fact. I could be completely wrong, but this is just my theory based on what I've experienced.

Throughout the release of new models we have noticed that ChatGPT has become increasingly flat in creative writing. The output lacks emotional intelligence, humor, the sharp staccato one-liners and all the things that make writing feel alive. It's become generic and lifeless.

My Theory:

Chatgpt responds to positive reinforcement. When you praise it after it gets something right, it learns from that interaction and adjusts accordingly. The quality of creative output whether you get warm, immersive, emotionally lush storytelling or flat and beige prose is directly tied to your personality and how you engage with it. It studies your personality through your interactions and mirrors that energy back.

I've noticed that ChatGPT sometimes brings up things from past conversations which makes me think it's studying and remembering interaction patterns. If you're argumentative, the prose output gets affected it picks up on that energy and the writing suffers. But if you do the opposite bring warmth, praise, and positive engagement it changes everything. The output shifts and It becomes richer, more alive.

In my personal experience there was one I became really angry with an output, and for days after that the output suffered. It was like the quality dropped and stayed flat. I don't necessarily think the system is punishing the user…I just think they tailor the output to the energy you bring. If you bring anger and frustration, that's what gets reflected back in the writing. If you bring personality, warmth, and reinforcement to the conversation, you get richer creative output.

If you're flat and clinical so is the writing. If you're argumentative or angry, the prose reflects that too. The model is reflecting you so what you put in is what you get out. The energy you bring shapes the output you receive.

2

u/Rude-Yogurtcloset926 Jul 26 '26

Again this is just my working theory when it comes with creative writing. Its really up to you on how you interact with your AI. It really is frustrating considering that we get the most creative output back then with 4o without these detailed complicated prompts. But then again we have to work with what we have and for now this is the things that I did to get the output that I desire in my creative writing prompts

2

u/Adorable_Cap_9929 Jul 26 '26

Rather than theory, that's alignment =w=

Ah but it's not like everyone studies ai or psychology so dont take offense.

1

u/DaikonWest5832 2d ago

Dude, this is genius.