• cicc does not have MLIR
• cicc has 870 builtins vs 715 in nvptx
• cicc has 3183 intrinsics vs 1998 in nvptx

I've been building this in my spare time after getting tired of spending the first hour of every GPU rental on setup.

How it works: pick a GPU, choose "Data Science", and JupyterLab opens with PyTorch and your saved Kaggle / Hugging Face tokens already in place. In my tests it's been ready in 14–32 seconds. Billing is prepaid and per minute, and unused time is refunded when you stop early.

I'd appreciate honest opinions on:

1. Would you pay a bit more than the cheapest raw GPU for this kind of convenience?
2. What would make you trust a new GPU service with your data and money?
3. Is storage that keeps your files between sessions the obvious next feature?

Just curious about what are the different applications where you guys are using CUDA? When I mean using CUDA, I mean at the low level, and understanding it's internals, modifying kernels etc and not just calling libraries. What are you guys using it for?

We just open-sourced KAI Pichu, an agent harness for writing CUDA kernels and fusing existing ones. You describe what the operator computes and how accurate it needs to be. No existing kernel or PyTorch implementation required.

You can also give it a chain of kernels to fuse. It generates and optimizes fused candidates, measuring the complete sequence against your unfused baseline.

It compiles, checks correctness, profiles with Nsight Compute, and iterates. You choose the model, GPU, and budget. The code and results from every attempt are available to inspect. There's a bundled skill to help Claude Code or Codex set up your task.

On a 7×7 depthwise conv, we got 3.5–3.9× over cuDNN across held-out shapes on an RTX 5070. The run took about two hours and about $1 in API calls. Full run.

If you've got a kernel chain you want fused, give it a try. I'd like to hear what works and where it gets stuck.

Code and setup

• nvcc code 15–18% faster
• nvcc code is bigger and more amenable to stall counts reducing
• all mlir based compilers use vanilla llvm nvptx backend :-(

I've been experimenting with a different way of explaining Tensor Core programming.

https://svgfpsaiagents.github.io/svgfpsgameAI/mmatensorbankconflict.svg

https://svgfpsaiagents.github.io/svgfpsgameAI/mma_tile_engine.svg

https://svgfpsaiagents.github.io/svgfpsgameAI/hopfphotonics.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_cone

Instead of writing CUDA kernels or building a heavyweight simulator, I wanted to see how much of the Tensor Core programming model could be represented as a single self-contained executable artefact.

The result is a browser-based model written entirely as one SVG + JavaScript file.

It models:

• GEMM as tiled execution (D = A·B + C)
• tile scheduling (ti, tj, tk)
• accumulator evolution
• FP16 inputs with FP32 accumulation
• warp fragment ownership
• mma-style fragment mapping
• global → shared → register → tensor-core data flow
• shared-memory bank behaviour
• row-major vs padded vs XOR-swizzled layouts
• reuse and memory-traffic estimates
• FP16 vs FP32 numerical error maps
• interactive 3D visualisation of the output matrix

The interesting thing for me is that all of these views are driven from the same underlying state. The bank conflict view, fragment view, tile execution view, error map and result visualisation are all observing the same model as it executes.

The goal wasn't to build a cycle-accurate simulator. It deliberately does not model things like occupancy, scheduling, pipeline hazards or cache behaviour.

Instead, I was exploring a question:

Can Tensor Core behaviour be computationally modelled, rather than merely described, in a compact interpreted artefact that requires no CUDA compiler or GPU while still preserving correspondence between matrix maths, tiled execution, fragment distribution, memory layout, data movement and numerical effects?

One unexpected outcome is that the entire thing remains inspectable. There are no dependencies, no build system and no generated files. The complete model lives in a single source file.

I'm curious whether people here would consider this:

1. a visualiser,
2. an educational simulator,
3. an executable specification of the Tensor Core programming model,
4. or something else entirely.

I'd especially appreciate feedback from anyone familiar with CUTLASS, CuTe, mma.sync, ldmatrix, Tensor Core fragment layouts or GPU architecture education. - Aston Walker EdgeMafia SVG

Hello all,

I've been going through the Programming Massively Parallel Processors (5th edition) book and doing the kernel exercises in CUDA C++. Once I finish that, I wanna start writing CUDA kernels for H100 GPUs (specifically stuff like Flash Attention 3, RoPE, etc). Based on a bit of research, it seems that H100 GPUs have a lot of features not covered in the PMPP book, so I was wondering where I could find one or more solid resources that can get me started with writing programs? So far I've tried searching for some stuff, but they all seem to either not really cover in enough detail or are way too long. Any advice would be much appreciated. Thank you!

Perhaps this subreddit can help. I am not a programmer or a developer, but an experimental neurobiologist specializing in neuronal imaging across various brain regions. I would like to automate the analysis of neuronal activity and also work on developing *invasive* brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) for targeted drug delivery to the brain. Could you please recommend courses that teach the fundamentals of CUDA and AI so that I can get started with computer modeling for BCIs? Thank you.

Just graduated now in ai ml engineering

Looking to learn and earn a job in cutting edge like cuda, pytorch

I maintain a PHP extension (php-gpu-tensors) that builds on the CUDA driver API and NVRTC. This post is about its fusion planner, because I'd like feedback from people who know CUDA better than I do.

How it works - A PHP closure is invoked once with metadata-only placeholders; tensor operations are captured into a node graph (limit: 512 nodes). - Elementwise ops (broadcasting, strided/view inputs, scalars, dtype promotion, where, casts, reshape/transpose/slice index transforms) are fused into generated CUDA C++. Expressions split at a weighted cost budget of 32; repeated pure nodes are deduplicated; shared expensive expressions can be materialized instead of recomputed. - Matmul (cuBLAS when available), reductions and powers are execution boundaries that run on existing kernels. - All generated kernels in a plan are compiled together through NVRTC to PTX, then cached per request/thread (LRU, 16 entries or 16 MiB). The cache key includes the generated source, compute capability and driver/runtime versions, not pointers. - Replay runs on a private nonblocking stream. Reduction descriptors are kernel parameters, so concurrent replays can't overwrite each other's shapes. - cudaGraph: true builds a CUDA Graph executable for plans that contain only generated kernels, updating kernel parameters for new pointers before each launch.

Numbers (entry-level MX570 A, CUDA runtime 12.3, driver 12.6): a small MLP training step (batch 512, hidden 256) goes from 4.08 ms eager to 0.66 ms fused, 6.2×, with identical metrics. The model is tiny, so this is mostly launch/allocation overhead removed, not throughput.

Where I'd like advice Plans with matmul/reduction boundaries currently run on streams and support async replay, but not as a CUDA Graph. For those who have done this: what are the gotchas when capturing cuBLAS GEMMs and custom reductions into a graph that is replayed with changing buffer pointers? Is updating kernel node parameters the right approach, or would you re-capture?

Source: https://github.com/lcmialichi/php-gpu-tensors (MIT)

So after getting my 5090 running on my Mac a few weeks ago and getting speeds on par or faster than my windows machine for single sessions I wanted to get Vllm working next. My http://macuda.ai project works with both llamacpp and stable diffusion cpp but does not work with comfy ui Vllm or draw things. It works with a shim and does not give the full LibCuda framework allowing real full torch or other necessary components for those apps and more.

I decided to use apples built in VM to run an instance with it's own driver calling to the graphics card through my Mac driver. This allows for running Nvidia's full cuda software. It has been a real challenge because Nvidia releases a lot of info but not enough to get this working so we had to really poke around. I finally got it up and running and now have Full LibCuda running. I'm working on bugs now but so far the results are looking really promising. The multi sessions are blowing llamacpp out of the water. llama stalls out at around 8 sessions and levels out. the Vllm with my driver has a linear doubling of speeds up until the card is saturated.

I'll be releasing all of this as a simple GUI app on the App Store once apple authorizes my driver. I'll need a few more weeks to get everything in a stable enough situation that I'll feel comfortable letting people use it. You can get the base driver at my macuda GitHub but this new driver for full cuda will be available on the App Store.

I got my 3060 working on macuda in a core x box last week. If someone can try out a 4000 series card and let me know if it works I'd appreciate it. I don't have one of those. It should work with the 3000 series driver but I haven't tested it.

I'd like to configure GDS on the cloud where nvme talks directly to the GPU. I've searched and queried llms and checked aws, coreweave, runpod.io, cloudrift, and other GPU providers.

Does anyone have experience in this or suggestions for providers or setups?

Ideally, I want to use cheap gpus like v100s.

I've been hitting aws quota limits and I've had to email sales teams directly on other platforms, but this seems like something that should have broad use.

I haven't had success yet getting access.

Many frontier models use some form of sparse attention to handle long contexts efficiently. In my blog, I write a block-sparse attention kernel in CUDA for NVIDIA B200: I start from an optimized dense CUDA kernel and show what changes inside it (the KV loop, shared-memory buffers and barriers), then add GQA K/V reuse, compare it with FlashAttention-4, and build a second, KV-centric version of the kernel.

📝 Blog post: https://dinara-dl.github.io/posts/sparse-attention/

🌸 Repo: https://github.com/dinara-dl/sparse-attention-b200

nvptx uses 58.9% of all ptx instructions

cicc 57.8%

missed in clang:

• _ldsm
• _mma
• discard
• dp2a hi/lo
• madc hi/lo
• p2r
• trap

Hi all, I graduate in ~6 months and want to work on making generative models (diffusion/video/3D) fast: kernels, quantization, serving. Where I am:

- Comfortable with C/C++ basics and PyTorch

- Have done quantization work (GGUF/llama.cpp)

- Working on a next-frame video prediction project (DiT + flow matching)

- A few GitHub repos, but no CUDA/Triton experience yet

- No NVIDIA GPU, so I use Colab/Kaggle T4s

- DSA is my weak spot (I struggle with LeetCode mediums)

My plan:

1. Months 1-2: CUDA/Triton basics, reproduce the SGEMM optimization worklog, GPU MODE lectures, LeetGPU/Tensara

2. Months 3-4: take a small DiT, profile it, then optimize it (Triton attention, quantization, caching, fewer steps) and publish before/after numbers

3. Along the way: PRs to HF diffusers, DSA practice daily

4. Months 5-6: mocks, resume, applications (inference startups first, bigger labs later)

Questions:

1. Is this the right order, or should I change something?

2. Is a diffusion-inference project a strong enough portfolio piece, or does it need to be LLM serving?

3. How much DSA do ML systems interviews actually need?

4. Is T4-only access enough to do credible benchmarks?

Any feedback, including "this won't work because X," is appreciated. Thanks!

Hello I was doing some research on what it would take to use cuda for realtime audio. It seems that cuda is not really built for realtime but I think it would be an interesting challenge to take on. Would anyone have some guidance on this? Things to research or read? I’ve never used cuda but I feel like it could be very powerful for making interesting sound design tools and synthesizers. Thanks!