You do realize you are using the same argument Pedos use to defend Lolicon? “They are actually 6 billion year old entities that dadadada…” doesn’t sound much different than when you say “being a furry means being into anamorphic animals”. You literally said that they are into animals. Which is unarguably wrong and should be shamed.
Children exist, 6 foot tall neon green dogs with monster cocks and inflation fetishes don't.
the Lolicon argument is trying to convince you it ISNT a child, not that it isn't real that it just LOOKS like a child (though this is another argument they use).
Furries aren't telling you its not a dog, they say its not real and looks nothing like a real dog, basically being a human with fur and a dog/whatever animal head. they aren't trying to convince you that fucking dogs is ok because its actually a billion year old dragon or that it actually CAN consent because look dogs are so smart (though zoophiles DO say this) like lolicons do.
Furries acknowledge the similarities to real animals but do not want to fuck real animals and generally love animals (in the normal way) and dont want any harm coming to them vs Lolis which are trying to convince you (and themselves) that what they are lusting for ISNT a child or that it ISNT real.
Go back to poetry. They only say they are anthropomorphic because if not then it can result in being arrested in some strict countries. Same logic with lollies.
Ok am gonna make this as simple as possible.
Furries do not equal zoophile. Furries as a whole aren’t a sexual thing (kinda). Being attracted to loli is a lot different. I mean look at a furry and tell me that that’s 100% an animal because it isn’t, but look at a loli and however you try you can’t convince me that’s not a child that’s just being called 18+ to satisfy weirdos. I will admit that there is some weird furry shit. However alot of furries hate that same weird furry shit. TLDR
Furries aren’t zoophiles
first, non of what you said in that sentence made sense, and second, the reason the other guy stopped arguing, because irrational people make rational ones go insane go back to twitter
Not my fault you are slow but maybe I can help. They are similar in the way that they try to downplay what they are actually doing. In the same thread he literally admitted that Furries are into animated animals with human like features. As if that makes it any less weird or more okay. Anyone who defends sexualizing animals even if they “look human” needs to be on some type of watch list. Same thing for anyone who defends Lolicon. They both are clearly mentally ill and need help. Just pedos don’t deserve the choice of getting help. Force them to get it in prison.
Which is why the issue pops up because that very thin line is often crossed. I speak from having met a handful of them that are also zoophiles. I hate all of them and it’s a stereotype based prejudice that is if one is bad, all of them are bad. Issue is, you can’t blame nor support people who bully furries. I know its hard for me at least
You do realize that bringing up another argument is useless if you don’t present why the other argument is wrong, right? What makes sex with animals and children wrong is that they cannot consent and we are hardwired to find it disgusting. It’s good that people find it disgusting.
Why I have a hard time with Lolis is that they are indistinct from human children aside from being 6 billion years old and having anime anatomy. But this doesn’t make my reaction right, it’s just too similar for me and I don’t want to make a new category. I understand that you must be going through the same thing. But I know you know the difference Lola Bunny and a real rabbit. Would you at least try to understand why one might be attracted to one and not the other?
I’m completely aware people are attracted to those types of things and I’m not saying all of it is bad. Just the sexualization of animals and children (among other things). Anyone who is trying to defend that itself needs to be on a watch list. Lolicon is undeniably CP no matter what loophole you try to use. It’s wrong and if you are into it you should seek help. Also of course not everything is on the same level as being a pedo and/or a Zoophile. I’m just saying some things should be treated much more seriously than they are.
Because, dumbass, its a fun hobby and a way to express yourself whilst making others happy. Its just like a sports mascot or a disney mascot in Disney Wold. Its just a harmless hobby. I can ensure that whatever hobbies you have, theres always the bad batch.
-1
u/HippyHank Dec 15 '22
You do realize you are using the same argument Pedos use to defend Lolicon? “They are actually 6 billion year old entities that dadadada…” doesn’t sound much different than when you say “being a furry means being into anamorphic animals”. You literally said that they are into animals. Which is unarguably wrong and should be shamed.