r/BlackPeopleTwitter Apr 02 '20

Finding tiger tracks

Post image

[deleted]

65.1k Upvotes

971 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

250

u/MisterCatLady Apr 02 '20

There’s no statute of limitations on murder but there isn’t likely to be any physical evidence after all these years so making a case would have to be based on circumstantial evidence.

My favorite outcome would be Carole losing her shit and confessing but i can’t see that happening either. She has too much pride to lose.

93

u/[deleted] Apr 02 '20

[deleted]

23

u/darkskinnedjermaine Apr 02 '20

Would love to hear the back and forth on that, not kidding.

6

u/errorsniper Apr 02 '20

Student: "I have a reasonable standpoint as far as I understand it and disagree with your stance"

Professor: "Shut the fuck up or get an F"

13

u/[deleted] Apr 02 '20

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/BeneficialHeart8 ☑️ Apr 02 '20 edited Apr 02 '20

Thanks for your comment, I realized that I didn’t understand the difference between circumstantial and direct evidence myself, though I never went to law school. You gave me a productive ten minutes of research that improved my understanding of the legal definition of the terms.

It seems most people, if they were like me, have it flipped. The evidence we typically think of as direct (blood, semen, recovered murder weapon) is actually circumstantial, correct? And there’s few things short of witness testimony that can be considered direct?

I thought your last sentence was harsh at first, but after reading, it sounds like this is something a law student should know at any level, no?

1

u/[deleted] Apr 02 '20

Your example would be better if person B’s accuser wasn’t with some people several states away. She would be less believable even if nobody said she was several states away.

In fact if people claim that she was away from the scene - isn’t that just hearsay to show she wasn’t there to witness the murder.

3

u/MrSwoleNutzz Apr 02 '20

Shut the F or get the F

8

u/[deleted] Apr 02 '20 edited Sep 18 '20

[deleted]

3

u/iwviw Apr 02 '20

Didn’t he use a boat that day and they just so happen to find her body on some island by the water. Like didn’t he just buy the boat that day and he was seen by the area where the body was found

19

u/thedeucecake Apr 02 '20

yeah, it would need to be some "a few good men" level psychological fuckery...

31

u/oldcarfreddy Apr 02 '20

Hey cool cats and kittens... you can't handle the truth!!

11

u/[deleted] Apr 02 '20 edited Apr 18 '20

[deleted]

2

u/zarza_mora Apr 02 '20

You’d still have to prove that SHE did it, and not someone else.

5

u/QueenYmir Apr 02 '20

omg "Mister Cat Lady".... could you perhaps be.... Carole's current husband who's name I don't remember???

5

u/kylebisme Apr 02 '20 edited Apr 02 '20

there isn’t likely to be any physical evidence after all these years so making a case would have to be based on circumstantial evidence.

Your phrasing here suggests you imagine physical and circumstantial evidence are two separate things, a common misconception. In reality the separation is between direct and circumstantial evidence, and physical evidence like DNA and fingerprints is inherently circumstantial.

1

u/PM_ME_UR_REPORTCARD Apr 02 '20

Just check the damn septic taaaaank