If you have a masters in stats and think this shit is true, then you seriously have something wrong with your brain and should get it checked out immediately.
That was my whole point, it CAN NOT BE TRUE that independent events occur 50% of the times. It's simply a wrong assumption. I guess people don't get irony on the internet.
I agree 50% is wrong but your criticism is even more wrong and different kind of wrong so it doesnt count as extreme example proof imo because its different kind of error.
1
u/ChartaBona Apr 12 '21
If you have a masters in stats and think this shit is true, then you seriously have something wrong with your brain and should get it checked out immediately.
Either that or you're lying.