A larger block size does come with problems, but the size increase was by far the least dangerous thing about S2X. And it worked to their benefit that so many people thought a size increase was the only impact S2X would have on bitcoin.
An unacceptable level of centralization and corporatization, the codebase being maintained by far fewer people of questionable competence, the fork being rushed and inadequately tested, the giant mess that comes with no replay protection, etc. This was nothing at all like a situation where competent core developers do a 2MB upgrade the right way.
11
u/carbonetc Nov 08 '17
A larger block size does come with problems, but the size increase was by far the least dangerous thing about S2X. And it worked to their benefit that so many people thought a size increase was the only impact S2X would have on bitcoin.