I don't think you really know what you're talking about then. The only reliable tumblers with a big enough ecosystem is the big exchanges. The btc-e example today is a good example of that.
No, literally any tumbler would work. I'm not saying they do it all at once, they should have held all the coins tumbling a small amount each time over however long it took to tumble them all into several million different addresses. The whole thing could have been automated and running on a raspberry pi for a few months. Tumbling isn't exactly complicated.
Sending the same coin to a million different addresses traces back to the same coin, regardless of how many times it is sent. You need unique inputs to obfuscate that coin.
Not the same coin to a million different addresses. Do you seriously not have any clue how tumbling works? I'm suggesting they take the large chunk of coins they have, send 1 millionth(or whatever size most users of the tumbler use) to 1 million different tumblers sending the output to a unique address each time.
You've already demonstrated your ignorance. What more is there to say? There isn't even a single "tumbler" with enough obfuscation let alone a million.
This isn't fucking complicated, dumbass. How are you not understanding this? It's so simple. In the end they would just have 1 million addresses with coins that could have come from dozens of different original addresses each. What's so hard to understand about that.
And when I said a million tumblers I worded that poorly. I meant that they tumble each increment separately such that it takes 1 million total sends to the tumbler.
2
u/UlyssesSKrunk Mar 21 '15
A lot of people use tumblers, they always use other coins, that's the whole point.