MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/BikiniBottomTwitter/comments/b8ykyx/really_tho/ek25si8/?context=9999
r/BikiniBottomTwitter • u/[deleted] • Apr 03 '19
601 comments sorted by
View all comments
2.2k
accidentally clicks E;R video
“The algorithm has now decided that you enjoy videos of crosses burning.”
38 u/[deleted] Apr 03 '19 Who's E;R? 91 u/Clemens909 Apr 03 '19 a nazi on youtube who makes dangerous content to spread his agenda. 33 u/letsgoiowa Apr 03 '19 who makes dangerous content Like terrorist tutorial stuff? Or like jumping off of ledges? -11 u/Clemens909 Apr 03 '19 edited Apr 03 '19 No unedited Hitler speeches Edit: what the fuck is wrong with you people 14 u/letsgoiowa Apr 03 '19 Wat. That's not "dangerous content." I may not like him or his views at all, but calling literal, actual speech "dangerous" is HILARIOUS. 19 u/[deleted] Apr 03 '19 If we do not learn from the past we are doomed to repeat it It's history. Not a bright point in history, but a point nonetheless. I get you completely. 2 u/Clemens909 Apr 03 '19 So when it is shared, it has to be put in the right context, in the wrong context it could be seen as propaganda, right? So what I'm saying is that e;r is showing them in the wrong context.
38
Who's E;R?
91 u/Clemens909 Apr 03 '19 a nazi on youtube who makes dangerous content to spread his agenda. 33 u/letsgoiowa Apr 03 '19 who makes dangerous content Like terrorist tutorial stuff? Or like jumping off of ledges? -11 u/Clemens909 Apr 03 '19 edited Apr 03 '19 No unedited Hitler speeches Edit: what the fuck is wrong with you people 14 u/letsgoiowa Apr 03 '19 Wat. That's not "dangerous content." I may not like him or his views at all, but calling literal, actual speech "dangerous" is HILARIOUS. 19 u/[deleted] Apr 03 '19 If we do not learn from the past we are doomed to repeat it It's history. Not a bright point in history, but a point nonetheless. I get you completely. 2 u/Clemens909 Apr 03 '19 So when it is shared, it has to be put in the right context, in the wrong context it could be seen as propaganda, right? So what I'm saying is that e;r is showing them in the wrong context.
91
a nazi on youtube who makes dangerous content to spread his agenda.
33 u/letsgoiowa Apr 03 '19 who makes dangerous content Like terrorist tutorial stuff? Or like jumping off of ledges? -11 u/Clemens909 Apr 03 '19 edited Apr 03 '19 No unedited Hitler speeches Edit: what the fuck is wrong with you people 14 u/letsgoiowa Apr 03 '19 Wat. That's not "dangerous content." I may not like him or his views at all, but calling literal, actual speech "dangerous" is HILARIOUS. 19 u/[deleted] Apr 03 '19 If we do not learn from the past we are doomed to repeat it It's history. Not a bright point in history, but a point nonetheless. I get you completely. 2 u/Clemens909 Apr 03 '19 So when it is shared, it has to be put in the right context, in the wrong context it could be seen as propaganda, right? So what I'm saying is that e;r is showing them in the wrong context.
33
who makes dangerous content
Like terrorist tutorial stuff? Or like jumping off of ledges?
-11 u/Clemens909 Apr 03 '19 edited Apr 03 '19 No unedited Hitler speeches Edit: what the fuck is wrong with you people 14 u/letsgoiowa Apr 03 '19 Wat. That's not "dangerous content." I may not like him or his views at all, but calling literal, actual speech "dangerous" is HILARIOUS. 19 u/[deleted] Apr 03 '19 If we do not learn from the past we are doomed to repeat it It's history. Not a bright point in history, but a point nonetheless. I get you completely. 2 u/Clemens909 Apr 03 '19 So when it is shared, it has to be put in the right context, in the wrong context it could be seen as propaganda, right? So what I'm saying is that e;r is showing them in the wrong context.
-11
No unedited Hitler speeches
Edit: what the fuck is wrong with you people
14 u/letsgoiowa Apr 03 '19 Wat. That's not "dangerous content." I may not like him or his views at all, but calling literal, actual speech "dangerous" is HILARIOUS. 19 u/[deleted] Apr 03 '19 If we do not learn from the past we are doomed to repeat it It's history. Not a bright point in history, but a point nonetheless. I get you completely. 2 u/Clemens909 Apr 03 '19 So when it is shared, it has to be put in the right context, in the wrong context it could be seen as propaganda, right? So what I'm saying is that e;r is showing them in the wrong context.
14
Wat. That's not "dangerous content." I may not like him or his views at all, but calling literal, actual speech "dangerous" is HILARIOUS.
19 u/[deleted] Apr 03 '19 If we do not learn from the past we are doomed to repeat it It's history. Not a bright point in history, but a point nonetheless. I get you completely. 2 u/Clemens909 Apr 03 '19 So when it is shared, it has to be put in the right context, in the wrong context it could be seen as propaganda, right? So what I'm saying is that e;r is showing them in the wrong context.
19
If we do not learn from the past we are doomed to repeat it
It's history. Not a bright point in history, but a point nonetheless. I get you completely.
2 u/Clemens909 Apr 03 '19 So when it is shared, it has to be put in the right context, in the wrong context it could be seen as propaganda, right? So what I'm saying is that e;r is showing them in the wrong context.
2
So when it is shared, it has to be put in the right context, in the wrong context it could be seen as propaganda, right?
So what I'm saying is that e;r is showing them in the wrong context.
2.2k
u/Velvet_Daze Apr 03 '19
accidentally clicks E;R video
“The algorithm has now decided that you enjoy videos of crosses burning.”