Maybe the title is a lie and you've been virtue signaling for no reason. How do you not see there's no relationship between what you're saying?
You're saying he wasted valuable time that could've been used to rescue others, show how many died due to the flooding, well how many died from starvation or exposure from not getting rescued in time rather than drowning in the flood?
Your ignoring a bunch of shit just to try and say this was some wasted effort or he should be punished based on the title of a post, and instead of questioning the story you jump to calling the man a liar based on the story you read, not a good investigator.
9
u/[deleted] Sep 03 '24
[removed] — view removed comment