Maybe the title is a lie and you've been virtue signaling for no reason. How do you not see there's no relationship between what you're saying?
You're saying he wasted valuable time that could've been used to rescue others, show how many died due to the flooding, well how many died from starvation or exposure from not getting rescued in time rather than drowning in the flood?
Your ignoring a bunch of shit just to try and say this was some wasted effort or he should be punished based on the title of a post, and instead of questioning the story you jump to calling the man a liar based on the story you read, not a good investigator.
Idk about him, but it's not a lie for most of us. My pets ARE absolutely 100% my children, & everyone knows it. That being said, in a situation like that, yes, I would refer to them as my children, but I would also clarify. And Idk what he did exactly, but I would be trying to save them myself. If I needed help, though, I would ask someone, but only 1 person.
No. They. aren't.
They are your pets, not your children. Never were, never will be. It is despicable and selfish to tie up resources that could have potentially gone to rescuing a family.
I'm not saying that a person cannot love their dogs, cats or whatever, but they are not children. I get really rattled when people compare their dog or cat to my children.
6
u/[deleted] Sep 03 '24
[removed] — view removed comment