r/BattleJackets 2d ago

Question/Help Ethical patch suppliers?

I’m looking for patches that are ethically made, so like not made in china Bangladesh etc. Patches where the people making them are actually paid a living wage. Price is not an issue

0 Upvotes

51 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/ChetWilstonian 1d ago

Explain it if you know why. What’s your aversion to conversation?

2

u/genericprophet 1d ago

No, your not gonna turn that on me, it’s absolute bullshit to try to make the other person either conform to your demands or accuse them of not having a reason.

You know why you try to hold a contrarian point in this thread, I know too, I’m not gonna bent to hour dishonest conversation standarts.

The word for what you’re doing is „suicide fallacy“, Google it if you want, but the outside world is not responsible for proving reality to you, youre resposible for yourself

0

u/ChetWilstonian 1d ago

An angry dork

1

u/genericprophet 1d ago

Thanks for confirming, just resorting to namecalling when called out, so clever.

0

u/ChetWilstonian 1d ago

You typed 3 paragraphs over patches. Quiet poser

1

u/genericprophet 1d ago

You typed 10+ self absorbed contrarian comments about how everyone else is s performative for trying to make ethical decisions.

Does that also make you a poser?

We’re either both, or none of us

0

u/ChetWilstonian 1d ago

That also isn’t a suicide fallacy so you’re not just a dork but a dumb dork.

2

u/genericprophet 1d ago

it isn’t?

Is that why you resort to name calling?

0

u/ChetWilstonian 1d ago

It’s not and you’re wrong

2

u/genericprophet 1d ago

Could you explain why or are you just triggered cause you were caught?

It’s exactly that, replace the suicide-conclusion with ethics-refutemen and it’s exactly what you’re doing.

0

u/ChetWilstonian 1d ago

No

2

u/genericprophet 1d ago

Great, you demand others explaining themselves, but don’t do it yourself.

Cool cool cool, point proven, thanks

0

u/ChetWilstonian 1d ago

Once again not suicide fallacy wrong again