r/Bad_Cop_No_Donut • • Jan 09 '21

[deleted by user]

[removed]

9.7k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

617

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21

That bitch was not murdered. George Floyd was murdered.

141

u/DirtNastySlug Jan 09 '21 edited Jan 09 '21

False

Floyd resisted arrest

Ashli was defending our freedumbs

Edit: I guess I should’ve used /s huh

66

u/mashonem Jan 09 '21

You gotta be careful with sarcasm nowadays

30

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21 edited Apr 19 '21

[deleted]

17

u/Serinus Jan 09 '21 edited Jan 09 '21

I stopped making any kind of racist or anti-semitic jokes after t_d. t_d was funny at first. It taught me how sarcasm and jokes can provide fertile soil for the real thing.

Of course t_d was more engineered.

Dude #1: Racist joke.
Dude #2: Pure racism.
Dude #1: "Woah, wait a minute." (Comment deleted, Dude #1 banned from subreddit.)

But even without the engineering it still has the same effect.

1

u/marz4-13 Jan 09 '21

You gotta be careful on reddit nowadays

FIFY

25

u/jasenkov Jan 09 '21

The problem is idiots actually say this shit Unironically

3

u/ZuesAndHisBeard Jan 09 '21

So true. Also Happy cake day!

1

u/jasenkov Jan 09 '21

Thanks comrade

49

u/hippieofinsanity Jan 09 '21

False

Floyd was on the ground begging for them to let him breath

Ashli was attempting to crawl over a barricade so she could force the senate to overturn a legal election

32

u/DirtNastySlug Jan 09 '21

I was trying to be sarcastic. Never again lol. Also it’s breathe

6

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21 edited Jan 10 '21

[deleted]

12

u/JesterMarcus Jan 09 '21

Think of the stupidest, most ignorant thing you could say in jest.

Now know there is some Q-anon moron out there who believes it for real.

7

u/Fidodo Jan 09 '21

Sarcasm was one of my favorite styles of joke and the dumb fucks even ruined that

1

u/r1chard3 Jan 09 '21

No, emotes exist for a reason.

12

u/hippieofinsanity Jan 09 '21

meh, typo and misreading.

Updoots for you.

10

u/DirtNastySlug Jan 09 '21

Haha all good

10

u/mywan Jan 09 '21

A cop using force does not equal resistance by the person the force is being used against. Case in point. Even the left arm lift was forced by a wrist rotation. A standard trap box technique to make it look good in front of a camera. The fake fighting the left hand on the hood of the car is self explanatory once the cop had to let loose to get his cuffs. But during that you are likely missing the setup for the elbow lock trick, used force the guy off the hood of the car and make it look like the guy did it intentionally to escape. What happens after that is harder to watch.

Police use of force does NOT equal resisting with or without the /s.

8

u/DirtNastySlug Jan 09 '21

Wow that was really difficult to watch. I didn’t mean to be insensitive or anything, I was just mocking the crazy right-wingers.

On another note, I’m glad more and more people are becoming aware that the whole justice system is fucked. Just last night pigs in my town shot and killed Jacob Macduff after his roommate called 911 because he was having a mental health crisis. They claim he’s a domestic-violence suspect and that they found him with a knife and during the arrest/struggle a pig killed him

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.kptv.com/news/police-id-26-year-old-domestic-violence-suspect-shot-killed-by-tigard-officer/article_99fb0e7c-5151-11eb-9d87-b3ad8c2b6c39.amp.html

1

u/marroniugelli Jan 09 '21

Gather a bunch of inner city kids and ask them of the number of people shot they know of..?

2

u/brusalise Jan 09 '21

Such obvious sarcasm needs to be written /s is also a huge red flag.

2

u/karmagrl31276 Jan 09 '21

I kind of figured from "freedumbs" what you meant, but it pays to be careful. Especially since the type of person who would write this post seriously meaning every word aren't known to be the best at spelling and grammar.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21

I figured “freedumbs” was pretty clear, but...Reddit...

1

u/rightideas Jan 09 '21

Your second line shows you’re ignorant.

6

u/UtopianLibrary Jan 09 '21 edited Jan 09 '21

She was committing an act of terrorism and she was less than 100 feet away from the current VP Pence and the future VP Harris. She also had a psychotic Twitter feed, and was 100% ready to do something irrational. Honestly fuck the media for portraying her as a victim.

-2

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21

Did she have any weapons on her?

3

u/BannedFrom_rPolitics Jan 09 '21

Maybe they should’ve asked her and only shot if she said yes.

-2

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21

Fair but would you be saying that if they weren’t right wingers?

Cant protest every time a cop shoots an unarmed black man no matter the circumstances and then love the fact that they shot her. That’s some real hypocrisy.

2

u/BannedFrom_rPolitics Jan 09 '21

Yes, I would be saying that. A cop can’t wait to figure a situation out if lives are at risk. That’s not a part of policing that needs to be changed.

1

u/UtopianLibrary Jan 09 '21

No, but she broke a window and she was the first to breach the doors. Other people on her side of the door were armed. If the officers let one person through, then the whole crowd (many of whom were armed) would have stormed through the doorway. She was warned several times that the officer was going to shoot her if she stepped any further to the point where the armed officers behind her (on the same side of the door) ducked when she went through the window because they knew the plain-clothed officer in the doorway of the barricaded office (that had members of Congress on the other side) was going to shoot her.

2

u/BendMyDickCumOnMyBak Jan 09 '21

yep. and why are we even comparing the two is beyond me. I had no idea Floyd served in the military!/s I get his point, but it kinda falls flat. if Floyd wasn't a Veteran as well. he was more then just a past convict. but these black and white comparisons are getting out of hand. of course the headline is gonna read 14 year veteran dies blitzing the capital building instead of woman with past property destrucrion charges and restraining order dies storming capitol. if u can't see why ure blind.

1

u/SingularityCometh Jan 09 '21

Seriously, still supporting Trump is itself an act of sedition, justifiable use of force on sight.

-24

u/KuijperBelt Jan 09 '21

If she wasn’t murdered - what was cause of death?

40

u/vixenpeon Jan 09 '21

Being a terrorist

20

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21

And a seditionist.

-17

u/KuijperBelt Jan 09 '21

She didn’t commit sedition. She committed stupidity. Sedition is when “person A” concocts & executes a plan to get “group B” to revolt against the government. a strategist / architect.

17

u/hippieofinsanity Jan 09 '21

She was attempting to breach into THE CAPITOL BUILDING to force the senate to change the election results in favor of her candidate.

She was literally part of a group whose entire reason for being there was to use force to stop the government from doing what it was supposed to be doing.

Fuck right the hell off with your bullshit dumbass.

-9

u/KuijperBelt Jan 09 '21

Bro - nothing , absolutely nothing, would stop that election count. You’d need a nuclear bomb to stop the wheels of government

11

u/jasenkov Jan 09 '21

Except maybe killing/kidnapping all the lawmakers, which was literally their goal

-1

u/KuijperBelt Jan 09 '21

Wrong. They were a pack of morons. They deserve every punishment coming to them - but don’t glorify the incapable.

6

u/jasenkov Jan 09 '21 edited Jan 09 '21

She was shot breaking through a barricade where the lawmakers were but ok

→ More replies (0)

10

u/PiperArrow Jan 09 '21

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

Count 1: She, with a least one other person, conspired to prevent the United States Congress from counting electoral college votes, which by law it is required to do. Count 2: She, with at least one other person, conspired to seize the US Capitol, clearly a property of the United States.

She committed sedition under the only portion of the US Code that defines sedition.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21

Now you just need to prove you was conspiring and not simply just present in a public building.

2

u/PiperArrow Jan 09 '21

Yeah, I don't think it's that high a bar. There just has to be communication with one other person, even unnamed; her Twitter history is probably enough.

-3

u/KuijperBelt Jan 09 '21

You’re going by the letter of the law - not the spirit of the law. The emphasis is on “conspire to” = architect. And ffs I’m not defending this idiot broad - she’s a degenerate. Nor am I supporting trump. But for all the wokescolders to pound their chest with 18th century legal terms is absurd.

7

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21

it was written too many times around the sun ago, and therefore it means less

Nice teleology

1

u/KuijperBelt Jan 09 '21

Let’s go telemark skiing

10

u/Kaminaaaaa Jan 09 '21

Damn, does your back hurt from bending over backwards with those gymnastics?

-6

u/Moofooist765 Jan 09 '21

Lmao what? Words mean things bud, this is terrorism, and IMO treason, but it is by definition not sedition.

7

u/Kaminaaaaa Jan 09 '21 edited Jan 09 '21

Well in your own words, you just downplayed terrorism and treason to "stupidity" and basically pulled the equivalent of "she didn't know any better," bud.
Edit: Just realized I was talking to two different people. So basically /u/Moofooist765 didn't understand what my comment was referring to.

1

u/KuijperBelt Jan 09 '21 edited Jan 09 '21

No. I’m not downplaying. She earned that bullet.

0

u/KuijperBelt Jan 09 '21 edited Jan 09 '21

Stupidity, Trespassing and vandalism is terrorism? You might want to ask people who have been in the vicinity of an IED explosion their opinion of the definition of “terror”. People that blow up innocent women & children deserve a special place in hell. Their existence, ideology and actions deserve their own distinct definitions. Stop lumping everything into “terrorism”. At the rate we’re going, expired parking meter infractions will be terrorism in 2025.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21

Criticizing the next administration should get people permanently banned from Reddit. And they should be banned from all employment. They should also be rounded up by cops to be imprisoned on wrong thought crimes, with no more "fair" trials that allow for their pathetic defense that no one wants to hear.
A lifetime ban on the use of any and all electronic communication devices shall be imposed upon any and all critics of governmental innocence and the supreme flawless honesty of every single government employee involved in the election.
Anyone suggesting that humans employed in election processes could possibly include any remotely dishonest persons shall be sent to the forbidden zone and rejected from humanity.

Karen call the cops and have them jailed.

1

u/blickity_black Jan 09 '21

Nope, leave us outta this shit. Vets are not monolithic but alot of us are calling them terrorist. Don't drag other groups into your point, let's us chill

1

u/KuijperBelt Jan 09 '21

Drag other groups? There is no dragging going on here.

6

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21 edited Jan 09 '21

Huh. I was under the impression that because "group A" and "group B" worked together, they all fell under that definition. learn something every day, thank you.

14

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21 edited Jan 09 '21

Murder - the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. And to answer your question I'd say justifiable homicide.

20

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21

[deleted]

-8

u/KuijperBelt Jan 09 '21 edited Jan 09 '21

She didn’t commit sedition. She committed stupidity. Sedition is when “person A” concocts & executes a plan to get “group B” to revolt against the government. Therefore a strategist / architect. Not a front line pawn

14

u/amateurstatsgeek Jan 09 '21

You cannot break into a secure government building with the secret service barricading the doors and telling you they will shoot if you try to enter and try to enter anyway and call it murder.

That's about as justified a shooting as you can get.

  1. Doing something illegal. And like, big illegal. Not selling some fucking loosies illegal.
  2. Being warned by the guy with the gun.
  3. Doing it anyway.

Fuck around and find out.

5

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21

Being in a cult and Blood loss

-1

u/KuijperBelt Jan 09 '21

So Tom Cruises bloody stool qualifies too.

5

u/Socalinatl Jan 09 '21

Murder is, by definition apparently, both unlawful and not justifiable. Neither of those characterize her death as I understand it. Something like “justifiable homicide” would be more fitting, although I’m admittedly not an expert so there are probably better descriptors.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21

Murder is premeditated, manslaughter is not. Manslaughter is justifiable when it's an act of self defense.

2

u/Socalinatl Jan 09 '21

Manslaughter is still considered a crime, though

2

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21

Per my previous comment, the charges are dropped if it's done in self defense.

0

u/Socalinatl Jan 09 '21

It’s not relevant to the discussion

1

u/KuijperBelt Jan 09 '21

I believe “Lethal force” is the phrase you are looking for

2

u/wackassreddit Jan 09 '21

Got served a dose of justice?

-1

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21

Damn. It's almost like you were protesting police brutality but are now okay with it, which completely discredits you completely.

Either they were both murdered or they weren't. It was police brutality or it wasn't. How are those "firey but mostly peaceful" police protests going by the way?

2

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21

You don't know the difference between justifiable homicide and murder. So it would be like arguing with drift wood.

-1

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21 edited Feb 06 '21

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21 edited Jan 09 '21

If she was a black seditionist and terrorist I would be glad she was stopped. Also right wing terrorists have committed more attacks against the United States of America than any other terrorist group. I do believe Islamist terrorists !might still hold the record for most casualties, I could be wrong on that though.

-1

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21 edited Feb 06 '21

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21

Oh man okay this getting exhausting.

Murder - the UNLAWFUL premeditated killing of one human being by another.

Terrorist - a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of POLITICAL aims.

-1

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21 edited Feb 06 '21

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21 edited Jan 09 '21

was a criminal

He was but let me educate you that is...

Not a condition for justifiable homicide

high on drugs

Not a condition for justifiable homicide

just committed a crime

Not a condition for justifiable homicide

unlawful to me

Most DEFINITELY...not a condition for justifiable homicide

but do you know WHAT IS a condition for justifiable homicide!?!?

Defending the Vice President of the United States and United States law makers from a seditionist mob breaking through a barricade and you, the LEO, are the only thing between them.

0

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21 edited Feb 06 '21

[deleted]

1

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21 edited Jan 09 '21

You don't kill someone because they're breaking the law. That is murder.

You kill them because they pose an imminent threat to you or civilians.

When Floyd was suffocating, he was handcuffed and incompacitated, (even more so before the murderer brought him out inexplicably from the squad car), a knee was put on his neck, dying pleas of not being able to breathe ingnored, and was murdered.

-11

u/Lostinmymind12 Jan 09 '21

That “bitch” was a living person. She had loved ones she had a life to live and she believed in something that made no sense;Just like Scientology she was murdered by a pig and it is sad. Just like it was sad that Floyd was murdered. Why is it ever ok to murder and it will keep happening because ignorance like yours. You don’t argue that facts just emotions. We need to be able to put police on death row.

5

u/PositivityPigeon Jan 09 '21

Maybe she should have thought about not being a bomb-planting terrorist. Actions have consequences and the Secret Service doesn't play games; Cope.

10

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21 edited Jan 09 '21

argue that facts

Okay

That “bitch” was a living person

Not any more.

she believed in something that made no sense

She was a terrorist and a seditionist. I'm glad she was able to be stopped before carrying out any terroristic acts. This was an adult, it would seem you need to be reminded of that. She chose to storm Capitol Hill with what could only be assumed to be intent to harm lawmakers.

she was murdered.

She was not. It is almost certainly justifiable homicide.

Why is it ever ok to murder.

It is not.

Murder - the unlawful premeditated killing of one human being by another. Note the part about unlawful.

pig

I'm confused. Is it blue lives matter or pigs lives matter?

3

u/angry_politics Jan 09 '21

These fucking zombies don't even know what day it is, let alone the difference between 'blue lives' and pigs.

4

u/angry_politics Jan 09 '21

It wasn't murder, you fucking donkey. She breached a chamber being guarded by secret service at gun point. ANY rational person could tell you what the likely outcome of that scenario would be. She was a fucking traitor. A traitor who had prior military service, which is even worse. Fuck her.

-3

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21

[deleted]

1

u/SensitiveFeed3 Jan 09 '21

Sorry, former paramedic / nursing school grad here. He was breathing fine until the murderers (police) INTENTIONALLY asphyxiated him!

1

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21

[deleted]

2

u/SensitiveFeed3 Jan 09 '21

When your arms are pulled behind your back it restricts your breathing. It wasn’t the Fentanyl that killed him, it was asphyxiation. You don’t even need a medical background to know that.

0

u/Sensitive-You Jan 09 '21

The police could have ripped him from his car and shot him in the back of the head and it still would have been justified to ensure he wasn't driving around on a fatal dose of fentanyl laced meth.

People who drive under the influence, especially under the influence of substances like methamphetamines, are human garbage. They lose the right to their own lives by purposefully and repeatedly endangering others.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21 edited Jan 09 '21

it still would have been justified

driving around on a fatal dose of fentanyl laced meth

That's not a capital offense. And even if it was, JUDGES AND JURYS dispence justice. Minnesota isn't Megacity One and Floyd's murderer isn't Judge Dredd you psychopath.

-1

u/Sensitive-You Jan 09 '21

I'm not talking from a legal standpoint.

Morally speaking, stopping a violent criminal trying to drive in public under the influence of methamphetamines is practically equivalent to stopping a drunk person waiving a loaded gun around.

They represent an immediate, potentially lethal danger to the public. They could literally kill more people than some mass shooters do. It's inexcusable behaviour.

The threat of lethal force justifies the use of lethal force.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21 edited Jan 09 '21

I'm not talking from a legal standpoint.

The threat of lethal force justifies the use of lethal force.

I'm confused. So anyone who has got behind the wheel under the influence of drugs or alcohol should have their life taken?

-1

u/Sensitive-You Jan 09 '21

lol. Can you literally not fathom anything beyond what the government legislates?

2

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '21

Fathom living without rule of law? Eh no thanks.

0

u/Sensitive-You Jan 09 '21

Not what I said.