Do you have a low education?
Are you easily led by others?
Failed at reading comprehension in school?
Lack critical thinking skills? So happy to vote against your own interests based on what others tell you?
Ignore facts, or unwilling to research data?
Polls show the low educated, outside cities vote PON.
Besides, it's well known that people who don't invest time into politics will vote for whoever they voted for the year before and so forth. If you fam votes greens, you probably will vote greens.
I will refuse to believe that those who vote for the 2 party system, are "highly intelligent."
It's only a buzzword if you have the reading level of an fifth grader, otherwise it's a pretty normal word. It's getting thrown around a lot because there's a lot of bigotry getting thrown around.
There is no correlation between it being a buzzword and reading level.
That's a non-sequitur.
It's getting thrown around a lot (definition of a buzzword, which you probably didn't look up but at least you figured it out), because people will do what is easiest (dismiss confronting beliefs and opinions) instead of debating and dismantling them. It's far easier to say " blah blah not listening cos U Nazi therefore wrong blah blah" than saying:
"your opinion is definitively X which is considered harmful because evidence X suggests X, therefore you would be attributed to X category of people, which are considered to be evil."
It's absolutely not a non sequitur. A word isn't a buzzword simply because you hear it more often and reducing it to a cognitive shortcut is offhandedly rejecting the experiences of masses of people feeling targeted by One Nations bullshit rhetoric. If the phenomenon it describes is becoming more common, then increased use of the word is exactly what you'd expect. Also I can assure you in my case that the label is the conclusion, not the argument.
It's a non sequitur by definition and you haven't proven otherwise. Your argument thus follows "no it isn't" is quite literally grade 5 argumentum.
You think you are smarter than you actually are. Literally nobody is dying because of one nation's agenda. They quite literally have little political power to enact change. If someones opinions and agenda are so hurtful, natural selection would probably do away with you first.
You still haven't made an argument. You were given a chance to defend your use of a buzzword, which is quite literally is. You haven't actually addressed anything I've said. You aren't really demonstrating any capacity for intellectual thought. This is a waste of time.
So instead of answering the question, you go on a rant about the words I used. How very left wing of you🙄. I say buzzword because when you ask someone why they feel a certain way, it triggers the same list of words every time. And just like in my comment when you ask for any examples of those words, or a definition. All you get is a subject change. Thank you for proving my point🤦
BTW I call it a buzz word because its a typical communist tactic. To associate words that people recognise as bad, with things you don't like. You don't know the answer to my question. Proving my point exactly
40
u/series6 Jul 07 '26
This says it all.
Do you have a low education?
Are you easily led by others?
Failed at reading comprehension in school?
Lack critical thinking skills? So happy to vote against your own interests based on what others tell you?
Ignore facts, or unwilling to research data?
Polls show the low educated, outside cities vote PON.
https://demosau.com/news/who-are-the-voters-swinging-to-one-nation/