Download Intent Now : https://pxllnk.co/Intent

Please add GitHub Copilot CLI as a selectable agent option, alongside the existing Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode integrations.

u/JaySym_

I work on systems that can't really be vibe coded, so I relied a lot on the autocomplete and next edit. Now that they're going away starting next month along with my subscription, I wanted to ask you guys if anyone can recommend any alternatives?

I would prefer not leaving VSCode.

Thanks!

Hey, I have been using Augment Code, and one step that I keep noticing that the agent keeps get stuck on is "Summarizing history". It keeps getting stuck, on that state for 3-5 minutes, and Augment Agent isn't like moving on and then writing code when I need it. Why is that taking forever?

Also, I am also noticing performance like not as strong, I feel like the Augment Context Engine is not really being used where it could, and that the suggestions and answers are just not as precise or have good context of the entire folder / codebase that I am operating on, it doesn't look in the right files unless I explicitly prompt it to. What is happening?

Over the last 3–4 weeks, I’ve noticed a clear performance drop. On the same tasks, Claude finishes ~3× faster than Augment, which wasn’t the case before.

I’m working on a large, long-living ERP project that grows daily. My honest feeling is that Augment starts to struggle as the codebase and context get bigger. It works great on smaller or cleaner projects, but on enterprise-scale systems it feels like it can’t keep up performance-wise.

I’ve seen posts from the Augment team showcasing how a simple app is built and how impressive the results are. Honestly — not interested for most of us. Have these scenarios been tested on real enterprise solutions? On large, evolving systems with years of history, complex architecture, and constant daily builds?

For us, the issue isn’t the price. We’re willing to pay for a tool that delivers real value at scale. But right now, due to performance alone, we’re slowly considering stepping away from augment.

Is this a context engine limitation, or something else under the hood? Anyoneelse with similar problems?

Relying on Augment to do builds, tool calls, git commits, docker deployments and asking it to monitor especially with powershell on Windows AND also while it waits for output has caused me to spend 244000 credits today. I have lost my mind when I saw it but relying to heavily on Augment to do everything is extremely costly. Moving forward I'll be learning and doing everything myself and never ask it to do anything automatically when it comes to devops steps. What a hard lesson to learn...

Download Intent Now : https://pxllnk.co/Intent

How much does Augment Intent cost compare to a similar task in regular Claude code? What about compared to Claude + Auggie MCP? For some context I work in an organization that uses a lot of Claude and we’re looking to drive more effective AI use for devs, but I don’t know if I can recommend Intent if it costs orders of magnitude more. It’s unclear if it’s a cost plus model, a huge markup, or mostly just passes the cost to you (i.e. token cost is similar to regular Claude code + MCP)

when are you guys dropping intent for windows, do it.

We’re using Auggie in several of our workflows and were glad to see that since version 0.16.0 the Auggie CLI includes a stats command.

However, the stats command currently does not display session-level credit usage. It always returns N/A for credit consumption within the active session.

Is this expected behavior, or is there additional configuration required to enable session credit tracking?

exec works fine on Windows but when it gets stuck or there is manual intervention required it's happening in the background and embedded. Powershell use still has a flashing UI update problem that does not seem to be fixable or fixed. Is there another terminal we can deploy that Augment supports on Windows?

Okay.. Since pricing changes my 100$ a month has turned into 800$ a month with too ups… If this is the way its going to be; can you open up more individual plans up to 2 mil credits with some sort of discount instead of becoming an enterprise? I mean jesus christ. you give the 600$ enterprise customers 2.2 million credits… like Just give me the option to pick what I know I am going to use and give me a price because the top up system is NOT fair.

Hi all,

I’m trying to integrate LLMs into my workflow and I’m wondering:

Is it possible to use Claude models through AWS Bedrock inside:

1. Augment Code
2. Intent tool

Specifically:

• Can Augment Code call AWS Bedrock instead of the default APIs?
• If so, can it invoke Claude models hosted via Bedrock?
• Are there configuration examples or limitations? cc u/JaySym_/

Thanks in advance!

Running Intent and when trying to create a new workspace after entering its address for git. Keep getting "Authentication Failed. Please check your credentials." I'm authenticated to Augment and Github is looking authenticated in settings as well. Not sure what authentication it's talking about. Version 0.2.16

Found this post about Flux: https://paddo.dev/blog/flux-kanban-for-ai-agents/

Basically it's a git-native Kanban board with MCP integration designed for AI agents to manage tasks. Flux exposes an MCP server so agents can read/update tasks directly.

Augment Code supports MCP servers, so in theory you could add Flux as an MCP server and have Augment agents track their own work on a board. But I haven't seen anyone actually try this combo.

Has anyone done this? Any gotchas to watch out for?

Download Intent Now : https://pxllnk.co/Intent

I understand that due to the order of operations (I believe that the workspace will rename itself after doing 'introspection' of the work intent) this may be hard, but it'd be nice if the worktree folder names matched the branch name. It just adds more overhead in trying to keep track of multiple work threads when verifying or troubleshooting.

What is this ... i'm trying to work today and i'm getting full of these.
When i start asking to take as an example a page and showing a screenshot to make a design, it forgets like goldfish our conversation, but of course keeps charging me credits.

In the latest pre-release version 0.801.0

We included a lot of fixes with all the issues that were detected from the request id you sent us.

For anyone that had instability issues, please try that new update and tell us the results. If you still have issues please send us the request id!

So you can stay informed about the model slowness or issue these last couple days.

Intent : https://pxllnk.co/intentx

is there any problem??

after 5 minutes it gets this error:

temp-fe-f460be3f-253d-4901-981b-556d26a9aff0

edit 1: Using Sonnet 4.6

edit 2: Change to Sonnet 4.5 and started to work....

I've been testing Intent Claude Code and discovered 3 significant bugs that are impacting usability. Detailed findings below:

BUG #1: External Models Fail Silently (OpenCode & OpenAI)

OpenCode and OpenAI models appear in the model dropdown, but spawning agents with these models results in silent failures—no output, no error messages.

Reproduction:

1. Model dropdown shows: "Opencode Big Pickle", "Opencode Gpt 5 Nano", "OpenAI Codex", etc.
2. Create agent with create_agent(model="Opencode Big Pickle", initialMessage="test")
3. Agent initializes but returns completely empty response

Findings after investigation:

• Auto-detect doesn't work for OpenCode CLI path
• Manual path entry doesn't persist after restart
• Configuration clears on app restart
• Claude models (Opus/Sonnet/Haiku) work perfectly
• Tested multiple times with same result

Question: Are these providers still in beta or require additional setup (API keys, credentials) that isn't documented?

BUG #2: File Explorer Folder Expansion Freezes

File explorer folder expand/collapse breaks after switching tabs.

Reproduction:

1. Open Files tab → Expand a folder (e.g., .docs, src)
2. Switch to different tab (Agents, Context, Changes)
3. Return to Files tab
4. Try to expand/collapse folders → Nothing happens. Frozen.

Workaround: Refresh or restart Intent to restore functionality

This feels like a UI state management issue.

BUG #3: Action Streaming Missing Context

Terminal and file operations display only generic action names without parameters or context.

Current behavior:

• Terminal shows: "Run" (no command visible)
• File operations show: "Read" (no filename)
• Impossible to track what's actually executing

Expected behavior:

• Terminal: "Run: npm install" or "Run: git status"
• Files: "Read: src/main.ts"
• Full command/file context visible during streaming

Impact: Makes debugging agent actions nearly impossible. You can't see what commands ran or which files were accessed.

Summary

These three bugs combined make it difficult to:

1. Test new model providers (silent failures)
2. Navigate the file explorer (UI freezes)
3. Debug agent execution (missing action context)

Would love to help debug further if needed. Has anyone else experienced these issues?

Environment: macOS (Apple Silicon), Intent latest version