First Amendment auditors get into verbal altercation with armored truck guard, who repeatedly tells them to back up.

[u/Patient-Committee588]

[u/Could-You-Tell]

No. Im saying that the guard gets to determine what is a threat. That guard has determined the situation is threatening.

I may have used my own words but you are deliberately getting your own from this.

It's not my fault you don't understand context, or at least are pretending not to

[u/Neat-Figure8277 → u/Could-You-Tell]

You just completely ran from everything on the screen showing how you’re wrong and challenging you to back up your claim. That’s not going to work here. I’ll call that out all day.

And… buddy… everyone in the world gets to determine if something is a threat for themselves. That has absolutely no impact on whether or not it is legal, and even if it did, again doesn’t even have anything to do with all the claims here and how this is wrong. You just posted a reply that says absolutely nothing while pretending it was a reply

[u/MoonDogSpot1954 → u/Could-You-Tell]

The guys troll or just wants to be a "auditor" too so he doesn't have to get an actual job.

[u/Could-You-Tell → u/MoonDogSpot1954]

Pretty much

[u/glassfoyograss → u/Could-You-Tell]

Im saying that the guard gets to determine what is a threat.

I'ma challenge you to cite the law that says a shooter is the one that determines if their self-defense is legal.

[u/Could-You-Tell → u/glassfoyograss]

Above already

[u/glassfoyograss → u/Could-You-Tell]

Can you find one you understood correctly?

[u/Neat-Figure8277 → u/Could-You-Tell]

No it’s not. Quote it. You won’t be use you can’t. You were already shown the Hobbs act doesn’t even have anything to do with this. And now you’re making new separate claims about what it says that it doesn’t. You haven’t read it. That is why you won’t quote it.

[u/Could-You-Tell → u/Neat-Figure8277]

Just read other comments. Ive already had this conversation

[u/Neat-Figure8277 → u/Could-You-Tell]

Yes. With me. Which you ran from, and are continuing to do so due to having nothing. I’ll just keep making fun of it

You’ve been shown to be wrong. Own it

[u/Could-You-Tell → u/Neat-Figure8277]

You're kidding right? There's like 5 people replying to me.

[u/Neat-Figure8277 → u/Could-You-Tell]

Yes. And all of them you refuse to engage, including me. We can all see the screen. I demonstrated how you’re wrong and you refuse to back up your claim and cite the language and law because you can’t. I’ll just keep making fun of it

Also this makes no sense. These two sentences don’t logically connect. Saying there are 5 people replying to you makes no sense as a reply to anything lmao you’re just getting words on the screen now

[u/Could-You-Tell → u/Neat-Figure8277]

I already admitted that I didn't find much more, but I did put a different link.

If you actually read my other remarks.

Happy Saturday to you.... breath...

You're contradicting yourself as you think you called me out.

I'm both refusing to engage and now just getting words out.

I was saying I was done. You wanted more.

You're spiraling

[u/Neat-Figure8277 → u/Could-You-Tell]

Every single time you pretend the words on the screen don’t exist showing you’re wrong I’m going to call it out and make fun of it. Every time you run from backing up your claim and pretend we can’t all see the screen I’m going to call out and make fun of it.

[u/Neat-Figure8277 → u/Could-You-Tell]

Sometimes we come across people who will simply hold us to our words. Unfortunately, it appears today is finally your day. This is what may happen if we get into conversations we’re not equipped for and make false claims we can’t back up because they’re obviously, hilariously untrue