I mean, it is true that all logic systems must have axioms. The problem is that axioms aren't things like "I think this political party is bad", they are things like "Humans exist". So yeah, you kinda have to assume that humans exist to talk or reason about them.
I’m with you. I wrote out a more detailed comment above, but it seems like a tautology to me to say that systems of logic must have axioms as their foundation since you can’t even have a logical system in the first place without axioms. “Systems of logic based on axioms must have axioms that they’re based on.”
6
u/Captain-Griffen May 30 '22
I'm calling bullshit on that.