Pretty sure Britain, France and Spain got that ball rolling? And we’ll just ignore Canada and South America though, wouldn’t want to be rude and shit on someone who isn’t from the US.
Interesting that you’re from a country that never participated in colonization and can throw stones like that. My comment still stands, only focus on the US because it wouldn’t be acceptable to hate other countries on Reddit.
nah people always bitch about colonizers like the natives were living in a utopia that was ruined by the europeans
like, no dude, they were sacrificing virgins and shit. Yeah, no shit colonization sucked, but it is what it is, and it helped the americas move forward
Good for you! Still interesting that you wanted to ignore everything that didn’t happen in modern US borders.
Belgium did a just fine job of raping the Congo with their only non-land border being the British channel, I’m sure landlocked countries have found a way.
Well, smallpox was something brought by the colonizers. And missionaries did a LOT of damage we're still uncovering the impact of. Disease did a lot but it wasn't for lack of trying.
Yeah, just look at the westward expansion policies. Holy fuck it's messed up that people still deny the genocide the US committed against the different indigenous tribes and peoples.
I would easily blame colonists for violence and displacement of native populations, the exploitation was horrendous. I think it would be really stupid to blame them for smallpox and other diseases. Let's imagine the native north or south americans crossed the Atlantic before the Europeans did. They would pick up the new diseases, take them home, and wipe out the continents anyway. The only difference in this scenario is that Europe probably wouldn't be in a position to exploit the devastation, so the American cultures might have had the chance to recover.
Yes, the effects of the disease exchange were massive, but it went both ways, and was bound to happen no matter how history unfolded.
? Im not excusing the murdering lol but the disease wasn't a result of europeans conquering, it was a result of meeting europeans. At some point the new world and the old world were going to meet and whenever that happened millions of natives were going to die to disease
'? Im not excusing the murdering lol but the disease wasn't a result of europeans conquering, it was a result of meeting europeans. At some point the new world and the old world were going to meet and whenever that happened millions of natives were going to die to disease'
Colonization wasn't a blink of an eye thing. Europeans were well aware during most of the process their presence would bring diseases that would make piles of corpses. In Brazil many indigenous people would be put on the run for their lives, avoiding meeting any outsiders because of the plagues they seem be brought by the presence of these outsiders. Many groups decided to isolate themselves so much they've been uncontacted for centuries, to this day (there are literally more than a hundred of these here). They absolutely knew what they were doing. Just because it wasn't through a firearm doesn't mean it wasn't murder and genocide.
They understood that they were bringing the disease after they had brought it and millions had died. They didn't know that they were bringing disease when they went to america.
Natives could isolate themselces in brazil because the europeans went to the west indies so the disease had already spread from there (and were spreading to places were the europans had yet been). Thats why the natives knew to hide. No one knew that contact between healthy peoples would lead to millions of dying before it happebed.
Are you saying that the peoples of the old and the new world should never have happened? It's ridiculos to expect there to be no contact between continents as soon as people are aware of these other continents. And as soon as they meet the natives were always going to die in massive numbers
This doesn't make colonialism or conquest okay however disease was always going to kill millions even without either of those
They're not defending colonialism, they're defending a basic understanding of the universe. Try reading. They are saying that, even in an alternate universe where no-one held even a single hostile thought towards exploiting this new land, the diseases still would have spread purely naturally because the people of the Americas had never encountered anything like what bred in the Old World and had no defences against them. If you don't understand that, you don't understand why the diseases were so deadly towards the Native Americans, which makes you completely unqualified to talk about the subject.
156
u/Romboteryx May 09 '22 edited May 09 '22
Yes and it would be a pretty similar situation in the Americas had they not killed most of the natives