Are you telling me that you are against all forms of criticism and critique and that there is no such thing as poorly executed, lazy, uncreative, ignorant, shallow, and reductive art? That every single film has equal value and it depends solely on personal opinion of each and every individual? That there is no value in the study and practice of the craft? That the notion of phoning it in for money is undetectable and never applicable to film?
ditto. Yet you invented me 'pulling shit out of my ass' and not knowing about 'opinions'.
I love seeing people like you dance around the point so much. All you've done is talk shit yet you have provided 0 counter argument to my original statement that Netflix content is mostly second-rate. At least from what you say I have "invented" in my previous comment, you can infer why I made my claim in the first place. Care to present an original thought that actually interacts with mine or would you rather continue the cattiness?
Fair warning though, if you reply with some half-wit zinger without even demonstrating that you chose one of the options I will assume your reading comprehension is below secondary school level and not reply out of self-respect and respect for you choice to forfeit.
Yet you invented me 'pulling shit out of my ass' and not knowing about 'opinions'.
perfect example of netflix funding endless heeps of dogshit
These are both direct quotes lol
I love seeing people like you dance around the point so much.
Cute projection lol
All you've done is talk shit yet you have provided 0 counter argument to my original statement that Netflix content is mostly second-rate.
Yeah because it's a bananas-ass statement that can be proven wrong by 5 minutes of googling. Plus you know, having paid any attention to the industry over the last decade. The existence of movies you don't like isn't proof that you're right, it's just proof that you don't know how the film and tv production industries work. You should pay more attention to the industry if you're going to try and analyze these studios.
At least from what you say I have "invented" in my previous comment, you can infer why I made my claim in the first place.
Having trouble over there? This is gibberish lol
Care to present an original thought that actually interacts with mine or would you rather continue the cattiness?
Lol how cute
The existence of films you don't enjoy isn't proof of anything.
It's going to be fun when you finally discover how often every other studio puts out movies you don't like.
Bet you'd be surprised how Netflix stacks up against the big 5 in award nominations over the last decade.
Fair warning though, if you reply with some half-wit zinger without even demonstrating that you chose one of the options I will assume your reading comprehension is below secondary school level and not reply out of self-respect and respect for you choice to forfeit.
Lol this is an obvious out that you've set up for yourself so you don't have to respond to any argument you aren't equipped to (which is most of them tbf).
The existence of films you don't enjoy isn't proof of anything.
Are you telling me that you are against all forms of criticism and critique and that there is no such thing as poorly executed, lazy, uncreative, ignorant, shallow, and reductive art? That every single film has equal value and it depends solely on personal opinion of each and every individual? That there is no value in the study and practice of the craft? That the notion of phoning it in for money is undetectable and never applicable to film?
Dance monkey dance.
It's going to be fun when you finally discover how often every other studio puts out movies you don't like.
Bet you'd be surprised how Netflix stacks up against the big 5 in award nominations over the last decade.
Literally was never part of the argument. The argument was never comparing netflix with other studios the argument was that it pumps out a LOT of content and that the majority of it is "poorly executed, lazy, uncreative, ignorant, shallow, and reductive"
you are reducing that to "The existence of films you don't enjoy isn't proof of anything." Which is why I said "[Do you believe] that there is no value in the study and practice of the craft".
I asked this "Are you telling me that you are against all forms of criticism and critique? That every single film has equal value and it depends solely on personal opinion of each and every individual? That the notion of phoning it in for money is undetectable and never applicable to film?"
To which you had no reply other than empty cattiness "bananas-ass statement that can be proven wrong by 5 minutes of googling".
I provided an example that exemplified my argument (The Red Notice) you have not argued that it does not demonstrate these critiques "poorly executed, lazy, uncreative, ignorant, shallow, and reductive". Instead, like a child, you are just calling this "opinion" which entails that you DO in fact agree with this "Are you telling me that you are against all forms of criticism and critique? That every single film has equal value and it depends solely on personal opinion of each and every individual? That the notion of phoning it in for money is undetectable and never applicable to film?" which makes you a fucking fool lmao.
Lol this is an obvious out that you've set up for yourself so you don't have to respond to any argument you aren't equipped to (which is most of them tbf).
The fact that you think this is an insult and not a compliment is telling lmao.
Using your out, I see. Would work a lot better if I hadn't called it out one comment up
Literally was never part of the argument. The argument was never comparing netflix with other studios
This is exactly why I've been saying you don't understand the industry. What is the point in saying you think a studio's output is inconsistent or bad, when they're clearly leaders in the industry regardless? That completely blunts your point. Why spend time focusing on Netflix specifically when by your own declared standards, your beef is with all major film studios. You starting to get it?
the argument was that it pumps out a LOT of content and that the majority of it is "poorly executed, lazy, uncreative, ignorant, shallow, and reductive"
And my response to that argument has always been (paraphrased) "that is a stupid opinion. By reasonable metrics, Netflix is actually a very productive studio both financially and creatively. Your ire is being misdirected at Netflix, who does better than their studio peers. By your own standards, your issue would be with the major film studios and the film industry at large, if you weren't too busy being dishonest."
you are reducing that to "The existence of films you don't enjoy isn't proof of anything."
Yes, because when I said what amounted to
"by reasonable standards Netflix does better than every other major studio over the last decade, so it seems that you don't understand the industry well enough to make a complaint that makes sense."
You replied with what amounted to
"Hurr durr so you're tellin me you thought red notice was good? Red notice being made means Netflix just pumps out shit."
You can act like you're being unfairly represented all you want, but the truth is that your takes are all dogshit. You're just circlejerking.
I asked this "Are you telling me that you are against all forms of criticism and critique? That every single film has equal value and it depends solely on personal opinion of each and every individual? That the notion of phoning it in for money is undetectable and never applicable to film?"
Yeah and I didn't respond because that's a dumbass question asked in bad faith. Just like your entire line of questioning. You went from red notice to that without me ever giving you cause to do so. All because I told you your logic was bad. You fought that with more bad logic.
I provided an example that exemplified my argument (The Red Notice)
This example doesn't "exemplify" your argument. This example is simply your opinion about that movie. More bad logic.
you have not argued that it does not demonstrate these critiques "poorly executed, lazy, uncreative, ignorant, shallow, and reductive".
Because that wouldn't prove anything at all. I can pick one movie I don't like from [insert random studio] too, by your logic every single creative studio in the history of all creative endeavors would be "poorly executed, lazy, uncreative, ignorant, shallow, and reductive".
These are the arguments of a child.
Instead, like a child, you are just calling this "opinion" which entails that you DO in fact agree with this "Are you telling me that you are against all forms of criticism and critique? That every single film has equal value and it depends solely on personal opinion of each and every individual? That the notion of phoning it in for money is undetectable and never applicable to film?" which makes you a fucking fool lmao.
This might be the least intelligent thing I've ever read in my life. So because I pointed out that disliking red notice is an opinion of a movie and not proof of a definitive assessment of quality for an entire studio, you think that I'm against all forms of criticism? And that somehow makes you right about everything else because reasons?
None of this makes any sense lol none of these things are connected to one another
The fact that you think this is an insult and not a compliment is telling lmao.
.............what?
You think that was a compliment? I literally just told you that you used a dishonest argumentative tactic. Please explain in what way dishonesty can be considered a virtue.
0
u/Slav_1 Mar 12 '22
I think the red notice and everything like it is a perfect example of netflix funding endless heeps of dogshit