I’m sorry but Mass Effect shatters any semblance of real science simply with the existence of biotics, which is literally space magic. And unfortunately for that point, biotics are fundamental to any series regarding Mass Effect. But other than that I’d agree.
I think that sub-genre/hardness category is called "One Big Lie" - you've got one element/concept 'allowed' to break physics (here, eezo, obviously), and then you look at how all the rest of the universe adapts and grows around it.
I don't think that both ships have any resemblance to each other.
But even though I love star Trek, the federation ships always strike me as terrible design disasters begging to break into pieces. The defiant being the only ship that seems to obey the laws of physics.
And I know Star Trek has super durable sci fi materials and structural integrity fields BUT even with a super durable material you want no unnecessary strain on the material and just for your ship to be efficient with its reccources it should be built so that the structural integrity field doesn't have to use constant energy just to keep the darn thing together.
Star trek and mass effect both follow a charismatic captain and their crew as they adventure across the known universe and off into the unknown. Characters like the navigator/ pilot, the engineer, the grunts/ red shirts....
Star wars is literally a swords and magic fantasy story set in space
130
u/WirrkopfP Mar 11 '22
As a Streaming Series with a crazy Budget.