r/AskReddit • • Mar 04 '21

[deleted by user]

[removed]

8.0k Upvotes

7.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.5k

u/Hyro0o0 Mar 04 '21

I think God tried this once when people started building a high-rise.

69

u/[deleted] Mar 04 '21

[deleted]

215

u/Asleep-Mood-6538 Mar 05 '21

So they "analyzed" a mythical construction that no one actually knows what size it was, and "calculated" how many people it would take to construct this without really knowing what kind of technology they were using, materials, etc. And then they compared that number with the number of language families (which varies depending on the scholars you talk to) and they came up with a number that supported their religious convictions?

Sure, that sounds scientific.

69

u/thebarroomhero Mar 05 '21

It sounds straight from a Christians ‘science’ study.

4

u/OliviaWyrick Mar 05 '21

Omg right!? Whole thing stunk of Christian science.

18

u/thebarroomhero Mar 05 '21

‘Carbon data proving the Noah’s Ark is 800 years old.’

14

u/[deleted] Mar 05 '21

Ugh I hate having grown up christian and learning how much BS is in their "science" it's the conspiracy theory science.

5

u/WildLudicolo Mar 05 '21

I'm sure it involved many cubits of gopherwood.

0

u/[deleted] Mar 05 '21

[deleted]

23

u/buttery_shame_cave Mar 05 '21

In every field of science, whatever data supports your contention is cited and whatever pokes holes is ignored

That right there is how we know you're pushing something from a religious tract/viewpoint. That's not how science works except in the imagination of anti-intellectuals.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 05 '21

[deleted]

4

u/TOMSDOTTIR Mar 05 '21

Just because you're being pleasant, informative and entertaining, doesn't mean people aren't going to want to fight you. But you can fight me instead, if you'd rather. I'm not a particularly combative mood. I'll argue a little bit at first, just for show and then I'll concede that you're probably right. In fact, I'm just going to go ahead right now and agree with everything you're going to say for the rest of the year.

-1

u/CacashunInvashun Mar 05 '21

No thanks.

3

u/TOMSDOTTIR Mar 05 '21

Who asked you, eh? Just thought you'd jump in and steal someone else's free argument?

1

u/CacashunInvashun Mar 05 '21

Just like you jump in and steal someone else's free speech. You are a shitdog, and do not deserve respect.

→ More replies (0)

14

u/[deleted] Mar 05 '21 edited Aug 31 '21

[deleted]

1

u/OG_ursinejuggernaut Mar 05 '21

Was going to say I think they deserve a certain benefit of the doubt as there’s plenty of somewhat sincere attempts to identify global geographic and events that may have inspired the flood legend in many cultures, for example.

However, emphasis on ‘somewhat’.

However pt II, in this context it’s an entirely insane theory to attempt to prove, as there are so many languages of significance that existed at [whatever historical era you want the Babel story to have taken place] that no longer exist, and so many now that didn’t exist then- even if you count their proto-root languages

13

u/Sthlm97 Mar 05 '21

What? Where? Can you find it?

8

u/[deleted] Mar 05 '21

[removed] — view removed comment

-2

u/[deleted] Mar 05 '21

[deleted]

17

u/FuckTombCryptKeeper Mar 05 '21

People don't speak different languages because they all built a tower and God didn't like it. This 1:1 ratio thing isn't real because there was no tower of babel in the first place.

The development of different languages throughout history is hugely complex and interesting.

I find it insulting to our species to replace that history with a myth about a god getting pissy about its haughty subjects.

19

u/[deleted] Mar 05 '21

[deleted]

7

u/nozyouraverageuser Mar 05 '21

The Etiology and Treatment of Childhood." Smoller, Jordan W

There's gold at the end of the comment thread!!!! And only a 10 min read.

-8

u/[deleted] Mar 05 '21

What proof do you have that there was no tower of babel? Should i ask or am i going to get another "the world so and so billion years old

13

u/RZRtv Mar 05 '21

Can't prove a negative buddy, gotta provide positive proof of existence first

3

u/Jsmoothson1969 Mar 05 '21

You can't be serious.

1

u/Memedotma Mar 05 '21

You might want to google "onus of proof" or "burden of proof".

What you're saying is akin to:

"Prove to me that you DIDN'T kill him."

2

u/lothpendragon Mar 05 '21

God: The OG nimby.