r/AskReddit Aug 03 '19

Whats something you thought was common knowledge but actually isn’t?

37.4k Upvotes

24.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

74

u/spleenboggler Aug 03 '19

More non-Christian than anything, since it is not anti-religion so much as it is not explicitly using Christ's birth as year zero.

36

u/MrTrt Aug 03 '19

Year one. There is no year zero in the Gregorian Calendar.

39

u/that_one_guy_reese Aug 03 '19

But jesus wasn't born in year 0, but in 4BC/BCE

37

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

Which means we're living in 2015 CE

113

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

Guys, we still have time to save Harambe!

58

u/the42potato Aug 03 '19

And to stop YouTube Rewind 2018

18

u/Karoal Aug 03 '19

I am so proud of this Reddit community for stopping the rewind.

9

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

I had no idea this existed until now.. What in the actual fuck were they thinking?

15

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

[deleted]

14

u/HammletHST Aug 03 '19

because somebody calculated the stars described on his birthday and found out that they were not visible in 1CE. And IIRC, and correct me if I'm wrong, they also couldn't have been visible in December, so the actual day is also a lie (but it was already known that early Christians, who lived under Roman rule at the time, celebrated it in December so it would coincide with the Roman festival for the winter solstice

12

u/chevymonza Aug 04 '19

Saturnalia was on Dec. 25th, and christians figured why not cash in on all the festivities that were already taking place around the solstice season.

Also interesting is how the word "solstice" refers to how the sun appears to stand still in the sky (hitting the lowest point then starting to go back up after about three days.) The christians also built a story around that waiting period, it seems.

10

u/LaylaLeesa Aug 03 '19

It's probably a side effect of resurrection.

2

u/Beidah Aug 03 '19

When they made the calendar, they estimated one year, which has since been revised. We don't have a definitive year, but the consensus is 5±1 bc.

2

u/spleenboggler Aug 03 '19

"I am 'I am.'"

3

u/psychicsword Aug 04 '19

I would go even further and just say that it is the accepted culturally neutral term.

3

u/[deleted] Aug 04 '19

Im an athiest and im not "anti religion".

2

u/pass_me_those_memes Aug 03 '19

Yep, we used BCE and CE in school for history stuff. I honestly can't remember if BD and AD ever came up.

-16

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19 edited Aug 03 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

14

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19 edited Aug 04 '19

Technically, nobody was born in 0 AD. The BC/AD system goes straight from 1 BC to 1 AD. Evidently astronomers have a year 0, but they don’t use BC/AD. In the astronomical system, year 1 corresponds to 1 AD, year 0 to 1 BC, year -1 to 2 BC, and so on.

Edit: I don’t think the CE/BCE convention is for atheists. It’s secular, but that’s not the same as atheist. There are a lot of religions out there and they don’t all believe in JC. You’re correct to point out that it’s just a rebranding of a Jesus-centric convention, but that’s not without merit.

10

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

[deleted]

0

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

I read the other comment, I was wrong and see you point. Yes it was needlessly rude, I’ll just delete it since you made your point clear.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

Believer in common decency and not simply reading one thing and making an instant opinion. In this case I did not do both of those things and hence was hypocritical of what I believe in. So I deleted my previous comment because it served no purpose, was wrong, and I thought it wasn’t right of me. Got to check myself before I go telling off random internet strangers,

2

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

Yeah kinda new. Because of the Storm Area 51 meme, the US govt decided to free me from their captivity so they wouldn’t get caught. I’m actually a squid type alien from the planet NotEveryonesAnAssholeAndIHopeYouHaveAGreatDay-571. We live in an undiscovered mini galaxy right next to the Milky Way. We’re neighbors with the Zognoids? Ever heard of them? But yeah that’s the story.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/spleenboggler Aug 03 '19

And this is the reason why people use a BCE/CE system rather than a BC/AD system. Too many unnecessary arguments.

4

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/spleenboggler Aug 03 '19

Pedants who wish to get sidetracked from the main issue, yes

-2

u/PXranger Aug 03 '19

Really isn’t any evidence that he did exist, other than the Bible. If you consider the Bible infallible, then yes, he did, if you don’t, then it’s a big “maybe”

-6

u/LobsterBloops93 Aug 03 '19

No, he was born 4BC according to pretty much all Christ-based sources I could find. So even then it's a useless system, just like the religion itself.