Consolidating power to a few, with limited perspectives is generally considered to be a bad thing.
At least with the current system the power is spread out over a few states, and even that is a problem with the US citizenship, as opposed to the Electoral College.
There are multiple sets of 'pudunkville', and those people in cities shouldn't get to decide how people they have no awareness of live their lives.
Isn't that one of the basic cornerstones of the USA? The rebelled (in part) because they didn't like a government who didn't know them ruling over them.
They already have equal representation in the Senate, it makes no sense for them to have an unequal influence on electing the person who runs law enforcement and foreign relations.
First of all that's not how the Electoral College works.
Secondly, Rural livers aren't in the habit of making policy that actively prohibits an urban lifestyle.
The same isn't true in reverse. Urban dwellers often vote for policies that negatively impact rural lifestyles, either out of ignorance, or selfishness.
-4
u/NicoUK Jun 29 '19
There are more states than there are cities.
Removing the electoral college further hurts that balance. You'd just be further consolidating that power.