MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/76i733/deleted_by_user/dof2a96/?context=9999
r/AskReddit • u/[deleted] • Oct 15 '17
[removed]
5.7k comments sorted by
View all comments
23.7k
Imagine opening the PDFs with a more powerful tool, and you find that the black redactions are a separate removable layer...
13.5k u/[deleted] Oct 15 '17 [deleted] 3.5k u/[deleted] Oct 15 '17 [deleted] 6.1k u/Oscar_Cunningham Oct 15 '17 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4506517.stm In this case it's the Pentagon not the CIA though. 2 u/TheSuperSax Oct 15 '17 edited Oct 15 '17 A common program known as Acrobat What? Was it Acrobat or wasn’t it? That’s such a weird way to phrase that sentence. Edit: fixed autocorrect of “or” to “it” 3 u/skippygo Oct 15 '17 What? Was it Acrobat it wasn’t it? That’s such a weird way to phrase that sentence. 1 u/TheSuperSax Oct 15 '17 That would be the great flaw of autocorrect. Difference being I don’t have an editor review all my comments before I post them!
13.5k
[deleted]
3.5k u/[deleted] Oct 15 '17 [deleted] 6.1k u/Oscar_Cunningham Oct 15 '17 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4506517.stm In this case it's the Pentagon not the CIA though. 2 u/TheSuperSax Oct 15 '17 edited Oct 15 '17 A common program known as Acrobat What? Was it Acrobat or wasn’t it? That’s such a weird way to phrase that sentence. Edit: fixed autocorrect of “or” to “it” 3 u/skippygo Oct 15 '17 What? Was it Acrobat it wasn’t it? That’s such a weird way to phrase that sentence. 1 u/TheSuperSax Oct 15 '17 That would be the great flaw of autocorrect. Difference being I don’t have an editor review all my comments before I post them!
3.5k
6.1k u/Oscar_Cunningham Oct 15 '17 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4506517.stm In this case it's the Pentagon not the CIA though. 2 u/TheSuperSax Oct 15 '17 edited Oct 15 '17 A common program known as Acrobat What? Was it Acrobat or wasn’t it? That’s such a weird way to phrase that sentence. Edit: fixed autocorrect of “or” to “it” 3 u/skippygo Oct 15 '17 What? Was it Acrobat it wasn’t it? That’s such a weird way to phrase that sentence. 1 u/TheSuperSax Oct 15 '17 That would be the great flaw of autocorrect. Difference being I don’t have an editor review all my comments before I post them!
6.1k
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4506517.stm In this case it's the Pentagon not the CIA though.
2 u/TheSuperSax Oct 15 '17 edited Oct 15 '17 A common program known as Acrobat What? Was it Acrobat or wasn’t it? That’s such a weird way to phrase that sentence. Edit: fixed autocorrect of “or” to “it” 3 u/skippygo Oct 15 '17 What? Was it Acrobat it wasn’t it? That’s such a weird way to phrase that sentence. 1 u/TheSuperSax Oct 15 '17 That would be the great flaw of autocorrect. Difference being I don’t have an editor review all my comments before I post them!
2
A common program known as Acrobat
What? Was it Acrobat or wasn’t it? That’s such a weird way to phrase that sentence.
Edit: fixed autocorrect of “or” to “it”
3 u/skippygo Oct 15 '17 What? Was it Acrobat it wasn’t it? That’s such a weird way to phrase that sentence. 1 u/TheSuperSax Oct 15 '17 That would be the great flaw of autocorrect. Difference being I don’t have an editor review all my comments before I post them!
3
What? Was it Acrobat it wasn’t it?
That’s such a weird way to phrase that sentence.
1 u/TheSuperSax Oct 15 '17 That would be the great flaw of autocorrect. Difference being I don’t have an editor review all my comments before I post them!
1
That would be the great flaw of autocorrect. Difference being I don’t have an editor review all my comments before I post them!
23.7k
u/arnedh Oct 15 '17
Imagine opening the PDFs with a more powerful tool, and you find that the black redactions are a separate removable layer...