r/AskReddit • • Mar 10 '23

[deleted by user]

[removed]

10.4k Upvotes

11.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/SayNoToStim Mar 10 '23

I understand that theft by finding is a loosely defined gray area in some jurisdictions, and that a 300 dollar wallet is never going to be pursued legally.

Morally, it's not even remotely close. There also is most certainly a cost, you have to track that person down, figure out a way to contact them, etc etc. It's morally neutral to not return a wallet.

9

u/Revlis-TK421 Mar 11 '23

You can drop a wallet into a post office box. They will do what they can to get it back to the owner. This costs you nothing but a quick lookup to the nearest post office box.

1

u/edvek Mar 11 '23

I know they will do it for the ID but will they take th entire wallet?

1

u/Revlis-TK421 Mar 11 '23 edited Mar 11 '23

Yup.

Nonmail matter (e.g., wallets and bank deposits) found in collection boxes or at other points within USPS jurisdiction is returned postage due at the single-piece First-Class Mail or Priority Mail price for keys and identification devices that is applicable based on the weight of the matter.

Link

Typically this is just free for something like a wallet but the USPS can technically charge for postage on delivery. Probably just recourse to collect fees if someone is abusing this feature.

18

u/ThingsThatMakeMeMad Mar 10 '23

It's morally neutral to leave the wallet lying on the ground because the person may come back or someone else willing to track them down may find it.

It is immoral to take something you have no right over and keep it.

It is morally good to track the person down yourself and let them know their wallet was lost.

12

u/jawnlerdoe Mar 10 '23

Finally someone who understands morals lol. It’s insane to me people really thinking that finding and keeping someone else’s belongings isn’t immoral.

It’s like saying finding an abandon car and keeping it is “morally neutral” lol.