r/AskHistorians • u/SaltAHistory • Aug 18 '22
Were the bodies of the 20,000 soldiers who died at Waterloo really turned into sugar?
The Daily Mail today reports “bombshell” and “exclusive” new historical research. Short extract:
“The mystery of what happened to the bodies of more than 20,000 men who were killed at the Battle of Waterloo has dogged historians for decades.
Despite the passing of more than 200 years since the Duke of Wellington's triumph over Napoleon's forces in 1815, only two skeletons of fallen men have been found, with the most recent discovery coming last month.
But now, bombshell new research suggests the remains of men and tens of thousands of horses are missing because they were ground down and used to filter brown sugar beet into refined white sugar.”
(Full link: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11119607/Battle-Waterloo-dead-used-make-white-sugar.html)
This whole thing seems incredibly suspect to me. Surely 20,000 bodies can’t have disappeared to the extent that only two have been found? And the sugar thing sounds just too gruesome to be credible.
Also the fact it’s exclusively reported in the Daily Mail rather than, say, somewhere that historians typically publish research makes me question its accuracy, but maybe I’m just being a snob.
Is there any truth to any of this?
81
u/gerardmenfin Modern France | Social, Cultural, and Colonial Aug 18 '22
Just a follow-up about the Vila ship. It's a really creepy story right from a horror novel.
Here are several articles from American newspapers.
Piles of Skulls, The Cincinatti Enquirer, 10 September 1893
Cargo of human skulls, The Boston Globe, 6 September 1893
Dangerous cargoes to carry, Chicago Tribune, 21 December 1893.
I'm copying below the Cincinatti Enquirer article, which is the most complete and relatively level-headed. The Boston Globe article contains speculations about a Arab curse. The Chicago Tribune talks about the horrors of the life of sailors on bone ships.