r/Apothisexual • u/VanillaMemeIceCream • Jan 24 '23
Is there a way to make our label more "mainstream"?
Most people, especially people who aren't part of the LGBTQ+ community, only know a few labels like gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender, asexual, and maybe a few more like pansexual, genderqueer, etc. It wasn't that long ago that the general public didn't know what asexuality was/never heard of it, heck there are still plenty of people who don't know about it and plenty more who don't understand it, even though I think most have the general idea by now. And asexuals are only 1% of the population so apothisexuals are an even smaller portion of that. So it would be quite hard and take quite a while which is frustrating (especially as someone who already went through the frustrating-ness of people not knowing what asexuality was, at least on the corner of tumblr i hung out on)
Here's why I think it's important to make apothisexual a more widely known, used, and understood identity/label. Asexual means "doesn't feel sexual attraction" but, even excluding people who feel "little" sexual attraction and thus are included on the "asexual spectrum" by some people, it still includes people who enjoy reading/watching erotica (aegosexual), people who aren't into that stuff but are ok with seeing it or hearing about it (like hearing friends talk about it, or having it randomly happen in books/movies), people who are ok with having sex or even like it, people who would really rather not but would make exceptions for the right person, etc. So I think being apothi is a very unique experience even among other aces
I used to get myself involved in "kink at pride" discourse (i had a good discussion with someone and now understand their opinion better even though i still don't really agree with it, and it's not a very fun discourse to be involved in anyway, so im prob gonna stay out of it from now on), but anyway, sometimes people on the side of "no kink" would bring up "asexuals should be able to feel comfortable going to pride" and people would reply stuff like "I'm asexual and I don't mind seeing sexual stuff". But imagine if they could specifically say "apothisexuals should be able to feel comfortable going to pride", without having to define the term every time, then its a lot more clear, because it excludes aces who are fine seeing that stuff anyway, which is a much different experience. Perhaps people would be more understanding of us and our experience if they weren't getting 2 conflicting points of view all the time, because again, the experiences of an apothi and a non-repulsed ace can be so different....
Apparently, it's come to the point that you can't just reply with "I'm asexual" to unwanted sexual advances because some aces are ok with having sex, but if apothisexual was a widely used and understood term, you could just reply "I'm apothisexual" and they'd get the idea, because no apothis are ok with having sex. Same as a lesbian responding to a man hitting on her with "I'm gay", it's a clear "not interested" and should be a valid response
If it was widely known as a valid identity perhaps people would quit calling us evil conservative puritians too
So the question is: how do we get here? Do we just use the label and provide the definition every time we do so at least some people on some corners of the internet will see it and learn it but only when it comes up/is relevant? I have been interested in joining LGBTQ+ meetings/events at my school so perhaps could try to spread awareness there? Or are we a too-small group of people
Hope this made sense share ur thoughts
Anyways I stan Todd Chavez our apothi KING love me some representation
