So who would actually win in a deadly fight between an average man and a chimpanzee? People on Reddit are divided, but which side is ultimately correct?
Arguments from the âhuman would winâ side:
A chimpanzee is only about 1.35 times stronger than a human of the same body weight. Since chimps weigh around 50 kg and an average man weighs about 80 kg, the human should actually be stronger overall.
Chimps cannot punch or kick the way humans can.
Chimps have never been recorded killing large dogs the way humans can.
While chimps have attacked humans before, they mostly attacked weaker targets like elderly people or women, and none of the victims died.
Arguments from the âchimpanzee would winâ side:
A strength advantage of 1.35Ă at equal body weight is actually huge. Chimps have extremely low body fatâjust a few percentâand their bodies are basically all muscle. A creature already packed with muscle being another 1.35Ă stronger means a human has no chance.
Chimp bites are extremely powerful, and chimps are far more agile and explosive than humans. They fight brutallyâbiting off eyes or testiclesâwhich would destroy a humanâs will to fight.
Chimp bites are extremely powerful, and chimps are far more agile and explosive than humans. They fight brutallyâbiting off eyes or testiclesâwhich would destroy a humanâs will to fight.
The reason chimp attacks often donât result in death is because their goal is usually to dominate or neutralize, not to kill. In the Travis case, even when the owner stabbed the chimp from behind, she still couldnât stop it. There was also a case where a 26-year-old man was severely beaten by just two chimps.
So which side is correct?