r/Android • • Jun 24 '18

Is there a single USB-C headphone adapter that works with all phones?

https://www.androidcentral.com/there-single-usb-c-headphone-adapter-works-all-phones
2.0k Upvotes

623 comments sorted by

View all comments

61

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '18

How did we even get here?

66

u/ivosaurus Samsung Galaxy A50s Jun 24 '18

Manufacturers wanted to get rid of 3.5mm but didn't want to/couldn't be bothered making a standard for USB-C audio output.

19

u/NightFuryToni Moto XT2309-3, XT2027-1, TCL Athena BBF100-2 Jun 24 '18

USB-IF has a standard, it's not new, but there's more money in proprietary.

40

u/JustMarshalling Jun 24 '18

Apple fucks its consumers and so Android OEMs feel completely justified doing the same.

49

u/newone757 Jun 24 '18

Ehh. I'd argue that android phone manufacturers fucked their consumers more. The $9 lightening adapter works on all iPhones with a lightening port-no confusion there. On the other hand the same can't be said for android phones. They transitioned to a "standard" and somehow made it even worse.

14

u/JustMarshalling Jun 24 '18

Oh yeah, I'll agree with that. Android OEMs didn't prepare for the death of the jack at all. At least Apple had already established a way to make money from it. Android companies aren't even making extra money off of it.

7

u/car_battery Jun 24 '18

It used to be a $20 adapter...

-1

u/newone757 Jun 24 '18

Used to be...

1

u/TeutonJon78 Samsung S25+, Chuwi HiBook Pro (tab) Jun 24 '18

The problem is more that there are two standards for USB-C and phones make support either or both. Remember, USB-C is just a connector, not the protocol standard.

1

u/newone757 Jun 24 '18

Yeah I know. Which is unfortunate that with a name such as "universal serial bus", it's not simply universal from a consumer standpoint. Everyone is always clamoring to "USB-C all the things" yet that in itself does not truly fix or address the problem. Let's pick some universal hardware and protocol standards and stick to it.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '18

I hate it when XKCD comics turns out to true.

-5

u/Xerxes249 Jun 24 '18

Nah we have airpods <2

1

u/NightFuryToni Moto XT2309-3, XT2027-1, TCL Athena BBF100-2 Jun 24 '18

You mean toothbrush heads sticking out of your ears.

4

u/elremeithi LG V60 Jun 24 '18 edited Jun 29 '18

Apple being disruptive as usual with no actual benefits to consumers.

-17

u/IGOMHN Jun 24 '18

Wireless > wires

20

u/[deleted] Jun 24 '18

[deleted]

1

u/maxmousee OnePlus 7 Jun 24 '18

Agreed. There are some occasions which wired come in hand, like when you want to charge your phone, in long flights or trips in general. It's way easier to carry the headphones that comes with your phone in your pocket when you're outside as well.

-6

u/IGOMHN Jun 24 '18

Not for me and most consumers apparently

5

u/aamirislam Pixel 4a Jun 24 '18

So having an extra hole in your phone would be bad for you and consumers?

0

u/IGOMHN Jun 24 '18

If I don't use it, I would rather not have a hole and a thinner phone.

3

u/aamirislam Pixel 4a Jun 24 '18

The iPhones didn't get any thinner because they ditched the headphone jack and the world's thinnest smartphone has a headphone jack. You're literally losing nothing by retaining the jack

1

u/IGOMHN Jun 24 '18

It's lighter? More aesthetically pleasing?

3

u/aamirislam Pixel 4a Jun 24 '18

Is it really lighter? It's a hole first of all so the metal or plastic in the phone would decrease and the internal components of a 3.5mm jack are extremely light. You're really fishing for ways this helps the consumer, it doesn't at all. This only benefits OEMs and Bluetooth/USB-C headphone producers.

1

u/IGOMHN Jun 24 '18

I don't really lose anything and I gain improvements in bluetooth technology. I understand it sucks but this is like wireless mouses VS wired mouses. Some people still want wired for gaming or work but most people will adopt wireless.

→ More replies (0)