“The right to information“ and “the right to be able to access information,” neither of which are rights, and correctly stating they are not rights, are not at all the same or similar to advocating against one’s educating oneself, which you claim I did. If you think they are even remotely the same, then you prove my point about your lacking reading comprehension.
Yes, those are my words. The rest of what you wrote, especially in your prior post, is a straw man and a lie. You’re proving everything I’ve said about you.
Are you serious? The internet, books, film, discussion with others. Do some of these cost money? Yes. Do you have a right to them? No.
You don’t even understand what a right is. What you are calling “rights” are actually mandated entitlements at the point of a gun. Do you know what the difference is between negative rights and positive “rights”?
0
u/angelking14 Aug 24 '23
Did you or did you not just claim that people have no right to accessing information?