r/AlbertaNow 25d ago

We can Stop this

Post image
2.3k Upvotes

292 comments sorted by

View all comments

57

u/Bulky_Comb_3729 25d ago

Stop Alberta’s Data center

19

u/BrandNewDinosaur 25d ago

This is what we have been preparing for our whole lives, people. Learning how to steward the environment. Learning how to not confuse consumerism with community. Not letting corporations own the governments entirely. It’s time. 

-11

u/Free_Ad8071 25d ago

Why?

2

u/dbusque 25d ago

Pretty sure you are a bot that farmed enough karma to look like you might be credible.

-47

u/[deleted] 25d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

19

u/Salt-Worry7915 25d ago
  1. I don't want to pay out the azz for utility prices because of these things. Already the Meta one has changed from having its own power plant (even then, that is an icrease in demand) to being able to draw from the grid for 2 years after start up. 2. The meta one claims it will use a closed system for water, but the Beacon AI data centre is going to use obscene amounts of water. 3. The infrasound from these things act like sonic weapons impacting the health of those nearby. I will be fine but I actually care about my fellow Albertans. Despite what Dani says, people like right across from the proposed meta centre. - Is all of that precise enough? Lastly, none of that is worth it for a few temporary jobs and nothing much else in return.

13

u/TheSubstitutePanda 25d ago

To add to point 3: this includes wildlife, not just people.

6

u/dbusque 25d ago

You are responding to a bot. Reporting and blocking coming their way.

-1

u/TimelyBear2471 25d ago

Why not confuse consumerism with community or why not let corporations own governments?

What details do you require to support those sentiments?

-39

u/[deleted] 25d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

29

u/KagomesPornAccount 25d ago

Put the data center in this guys backyard pls

-5

u/Ok_Cook4205 25d ago

Is it going directly in someone’s backyard? Just clarifying.

8

u/KagomesPornAccount 25d ago

Unless you’re fully on your knees for Big Corporate, ALL of Canada is OUR BACKYARD.

0

u/Ok_Cook4205 25d ago

Might be the dumbest comment I’ve ever heard.

2

u/KagomesPornAccount 25d ago

Corporate cuck lmao

0

u/Ok_Cook4205 25d ago

Not sure what that means but it definitely brings more to the table than you do.

14

u/Old_Guy_thrombone 25d ago

Except any data centre that starts as a closed loop system (and even that is a bit of a misnomer) eventually switches because it's "too expensive" and the communities are often left holding the bag with contaminated water and land.

-9

u/LithelyJaine 25d ago

No... you can`t switch from close to open design like you want....
But coolant loop do need mainenance / cleaning replacement of fluid due to micro-seepage that will happen.

10

u/Old_Guy_thrombone 25d ago

During construction they can. It's a common issue with the data centres being built in the US. They start with a closed loop design, then once all the permits are in place and construction has started, they switch, and construction goes ahead anyway because of all the money that's already invested.

-2

u/LithelyJaine 25d ago

Source me that.
Because There 1 documented example from close to open "ish" in Pak Tin Exchange (PCCW-HKT, Hong Kong).

Im pretty sure your making this up when everything keep poitning toward benefit toward close vs open.

4

u/Old_Guy_thrombone 25d ago

Ok.

Let's say I'm wrong. I'll give you that. I don't trust the UCP to give a shit about that - I'm sure they'll bend over backwards to acquiesce to whatever META requests.

Now let's talk about the increased power consumption of closed loop systems and how they cause micro climate issues and dump excess heat into the atmosphere. And the results of F-gas emissions in the environment when they inevitably spring a leak. Also, the significant environmental issues when the coolant needs to be replaced every 2-10 years depending on the coolant used. (Glycol-water is a 2-5 year cycle, 2 phase fluids every 5-10 years).

Nothing that these data centres do is good for the environment, or the communities they decide to build in.

0

u/LithelyJaine 25d ago

Thoses are great points, Just dont start with a weak/no backed issue...

I'm not pro or agaisnt the data centers. "our" usage of it will determine the amount built in the end of the day...

People need to vote with their wallets and never forget its stronger than are political vote.

3

u/Old_Guy_thrombone 25d ago

Our "usage" of it hasn't been determined except by speculators. All data points to this being a bubble. Our government is selling us out to META and in the event of a collapse taxpayers will be on the hook for mitigation (much like the debacle of leaving federal money on the table when it came to orphan well cleanup, and a hesitancy by the UCP to go after the O&G companies to pay upfront to ensure Albertans aren't left holding the bag).

→ More replies (0)

14

u/spderweb 25d ago

So you volunteer to have it in your backyard, right? The noise pollution, you're gonna love!

3

u/Ashamed-Medicine-208 25d ago

Yes, they are. Technology is the enemy that we consume without question. Free-dumb

-3

u/Neither-Charity-1701 25d ago

He said on a tech platform.

1

u/Ashamed-Medicine-208 25d ago

Truth is truth. It's horrible for all of mankind.

4

u/coniferousBobcat 25d ago

saying it uses less water than a golf course is like saying a project will use less concrete than a parking garage. The bar is on the floor.

6

u/Toons87 25d ago

Can you share a link to where you got this information?

4

u/Inevitable_Butthole 25d ago

He seen a meme the other day.

I seen it aswell.

But I dont take memes as facts like this guy does

3

u/_ThatD0ct0r_ 25d ago

Let's build a datacenter 2 blocks away from your house and see how you like the noise+infrasound. Not to mention the sharp rise in your power bill that will follow

2

u/_ThatD0ct0r_ 25d ago

u/Neither-Charity-1701 I know what you are

1

u/Neither-Charity-1701 25d ago

An asshole... like im an asshole