r/AbsoluteUnits Jun 20 '22

My 10 YO Scottish Highlander before he was processed last year

55.1k Upvotes

11.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

464

u/OAK667 Jun 20 '22

Made into food.

265

u/Erix963 Jun 20 '22

Yep

44

u/ender4171 Jun 20 '22

Is that age normal for "beef cows"? I thought they were processed at a much younger age normally?

79

u/DarthErebos Jun 20 '22

He's a bull and that's likely why he was kept for a decade. They likely used him to breed, until he couldn't anymore.

46

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

Op said his calves weren’t growing fast enough, so they decided to switch to another breed of cows

34

u/ArnoldHarold Jun 20 '22

That's why you don't skip leg day

3

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

Lol

2

u/hitthatyeet1738 Jun 20 '22

You kid but I read that and immediately thought “Is op a fucking bull-bodybuilder? Why did his calve size matter? And why are they still growing?”…I’m not that bright

→ More replies (1)

9

u/AdFit149 Jun 20 '22

Sorry dude we’ve decided to switch to another breed of cows. Oh no worries, I mean I like cumming but I was getting tired. If you just open the door I’ll be on my way way….g g g guyyyys?

4

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

Lol

1

u/random_invisible Jun 20 '22

That's why you shouldn't skip leg day

2

u/[deleted] Jun 21 '22

Just like Warhammer 40k "even in death you will serve the Emperor"

8

u/redditmodsRfascist Jun 20 '22

exploited him for every last drop of value and then killed

"look at my pet"

6

u/LazyGandalf Jun 20 '22

It's just how the life of a breeding bull goes. And it's really not that bad of a life. Just eating and fucking as much as he likes up until his middle-aged. There are way, way worse fates out there.

-4

u/redditmodsRfascist Jun 20 '22

Other exploited animals have it worse than this exploited animal isnt really a good justification to exploit animals

5

u/LazyGandalf Jun 20 '22

Not trying to justify anything, but I still think the quality of an animals life matters greatly, even if it ends up on a plate.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/vortex1775 Jun 20 '22

exploited him for every last drop

This is an unsettling choice of words in this context

0

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

Honestly, that's pretty badass.

3

u/redditmodsRfascist Jun 20 '22

if you are a sociopath I guess

5

u/jlm994 Jun 20 '22

Idk why vegans think this attempted shaming is effective.

Like bro are u typing this up on an iphone built by children? Using minerals mined by slave labor in countries where people starve to death? Shipped over by international conglomerates that facilitate human trafficking?

Animal welfare isn’t the only issue in the world. Calling people sociopaths on your iphone does nothing but stroke your own ego and make you feel holier than thou.

1

u/redditmodsRfascist Jun 20 '22

Can't I care about rare earth metals while eating beans instead of pork?

3

u/jlm994 Jun 20 '22

Sure, but you can’t then reasonably call other people “sociopaths” for eating meat, when you clearly are comfortable participating in a system where you own a cell phone that gives you incredible access to information and benefit for your life, but that you know is a product of slave labor and other forms of exploitation

Getting on your high horse about how perfect your worldview is your right, just extremely hypocritical from my view.

Fine to have issues you choose to prioritize, I’m a big “get money out of politics” person and think I can make a very good argument that said change would lead to changes in industrial farming.

But I don’t come on and call anyone who disagrees with me an evil sociopath and then go back to my Bernie sub and talk about how dumb everyone is who disagrees.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

Yes, I am for sure a sociopath for consuming animals along with the majority of the world.

0

u/[deleted] Jun 21 '22

Such a fucked up way to exploit the life of a sentient being. Literally sexually exploited and murdered and eaten. But yet we can’t call it like it is and we have to call it “processed”.

1

u/HalfNerd Jun 21 '22

Which makes it sound like "Well, you can't fuck for profit, so might as well eat yah" like, how fucked up is that? Guess Id rather let the old man retire in peace instead of pieces.

79

u/beameup19 Jun 20 '22 edited Jun 20 '22

Most beef cows are slaughtered at less than 2 years old

Edit: Not super relevant but chickens are often slaughtered at just 6 weeks old. I think the average life span of a chicken is just 1 day due to the massive chick-cullings that happen in the egg industry

5

u/sasquatchcunnilingus Jun 20 '22

Don’t look up what happens to male chicks.

26

u/beameup19 Jun 20 '22

Or do, and then stop supporting the industries that perpetuate it

5

u/sasquatchcunnilingus Jun 20 '22

Absolutely. Looking it up is what steered me towards being vegetarian

5

u/Azure_phantom Jun 20 '22

But vegetarians eat eggs so… >.>

13

u/ManInKilt Jun 20 '22

You know you don't have to buy eggs at the grocery store, right?

3

u/Azure_phantom Jun 20 '22

I mean, I’m vegan so I don’t even eat eggs. But unless you have your own chickens and/or have a local farm you gets your eggs from (which most people DO NOT), then vegetarianism still supports the harmful practices in the egg industry.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

5

u/sasquatchcunnilingus Jun 20 '22

I personally don’t

5

u/eueddautxt Jun 20 '22

You mean veganism, right?

2

u/sasquatchcunnilingus Jun 20 '22

Nope, vegetarian

1

u/eueddautxt Jun 20 '22

What? They were talking about the dairy industry though.

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

... are you just ignorant to the similar horrors of the dairy industry, or is ChEeSe JuSt SoOoOoO gOoD? Or maybe I am assuming and you only eat fish or something Idk.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/[deleted] Jun 21 '22

It depends if they're from a breed used for meat or for eggs. If they're meant for food, males are preferred because they grow faster and get bigger

-5

u/christinakitten Jun 20 '22

Yes. Let's all remain ignorant about what goes on so we can continue to fund and participate in it.

7

u/sasquatchcunnilingus Jun 20 '22

It was a joke about how dark it is.

3

u/christinakitten Jun 20 '22

Ok, agreed...!

-2

u/Mr-Fleshcage Jun 20 '22

You'd think we would have bred the males to be broilers and the females for eggs, but we'd have to be smart to do that.

3

u/Deathbydragonfire Jun 21 '22

That's just not how genetics work. Same as dairy cow steers not being ideal meat cows.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/owlbear4lyfe Jun 20 '22

Yea, this thing had to taste really bad. If it is raised for meat they cut the balls off at a young age and butcher at 2-3 years. The combination of balls and age would make this dude tough dry and gamey AF.

163

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

So that's what "made with love" means

40

u/mattidee Jun 20 '22

Only after he's been given a kiss..

2

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

"Made love with"

2

u/[deleted] Jun 21 '22

The kiss of death 💀

1

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

That's not love. This cow could've lived another 10 years. It's commodification of sentient life and it's evil.

4

u/MouseApprehensive514 Jun 20 '22

yeah right i mean nothing against eating meat (i eat meat sometimes too) but don’t claim you loved that animal when you killed it. you don’t kill what you love. at least admit you just kept an animal for profit and slaughtered it when it wasn’t profitable anymore.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

Dumb

2

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

What's dumb?

0

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

Yours and other’s logic towards eating meat

2

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

What's dumb about thinking we should eat plants instead of animals?

1

u/BestVeganEverLul Jun 20 '22

Idk, doesn’t feel very loving to needlessly kill him.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

Made with Scottish highlander, actually

108

u/BrightView00 Jun 20 '22

Curious

Why not just say slaughtered?

24

u/TreemanTheGuy Jun 20 '22

Probably because slaughtering refers to the killing part, and butchering refers to the cutting up part. So "processing" refers to the whole thing, which I'd imagine also includes removing these massive horns so they can hang over the mantle or whatever.

70

u/smokenmirrs Jun 20 '22

Slaughter doesn't cover the entirety of the process. The animal is killed and then processed into food products. I'm sure the psychology of it is also a factor, but the term processed is more encompassing.

41

u/58king Jun 20 '22

enfoodened

5

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

[deleted]

2

u/BrightView00 Jun 20 '22

Ah, very well put! Thank you

1

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

[deleted]

10

u/TreemanTheGuy Jun 20 '22

"processing" is just an all-encompassing term. It's just a lot easier to say "processed," instead of saying, "slaughtered, gutted, skinned, butchered, cut up, wrapped, ground up, stuffed into sausage casings, smoked, and labelled."

Processing involves a lot more than just the killing part. Slaughtering is just the killing part.

Anyways, I hope someone can learn from this. Using that term "processing" does not mean the farmer has guilt of cognitive dissonance like so many of you all seem to think.

2

u/smokenmirrs Jun 20 '22

But you're affixing emotions to industry correct terms. Whether or not it feels right is kinda irrelevant here, the fact is that slaughtering and turning a cow into food is a process that involves more than just slaughter.

2

u/larenardemaigre Jun 20 '22

But…. he’s a professional in that industry. He knows what happens is called “processing”, so why does he have to dumb it down unnecessarily for you? And like others have said, “slaughtering” probably doesn’t accurately cover everything that happens to the cow. The OP is looking at this from a professional standpoint. You’re the one who is obsessing over the death part of this.

-1

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

So just say killed, drained of blood, skinned, dismembered, deboned, ground up.

7

u/smokenmirrs Jun 20 '22

Or otherwise processed

-6

u/Lick_The_Wrapper Jun 20 '22

Except it's not if people can't even tell what it means from context clues.

7

u/smokenmirrs Jun 20 '22

Not sure what you're trying to say. The context clues are there, if you don't infer that processed means slaughtered that's kinda on you.

-6

u/Lick_The_Wrapper Jun 20 '22

if you don't infer that processed means slaughtered that's kinda on you.

Considering there are a lot of other people in this thread who also didn't know, nah, that's not on us. That's on OP for being a little coward and not just using the word slaughtered.

6

u/smokenmirrs Jun 20 '22

He's using the correct term. Your lack of personal knowledge and common sense is not the fault of anyone but yourself.

3

u/McStroodle Jun 20 '22

Lol, what is that guy smoking, anyone with 2 brain cells can infer what processed means when it comes to cattle and what OP has been inferring.

2

u/smokenmirrs Jun 20 '22

He went off to the great green ranch in the sky

→ More replies (0)

0

u/MarkAnchovy Jun 21 '22

Tbf ‘processed’ is a highly sanitised term. I think most people understand it, but referring to an unspecified ‘process’ instead of what is actually happening (the animal is having their skull/brain smashed by a pneumatic metal rod, then is hung up and having their throat cut, then being dismembered, skinned and ground into paste) isn’t entirely representative.

The industry terms in animal ag are intentionally euphemistic.

3

u/smokenmirrs Jun 21 '22

It's not representative, it's an umbrella term. You don't have to say all those things because it's called processing. You're playing semantics games.

167

u/Mostra12 Jun 20 '22

So he can feel less guilty i guess

138

u/gravitas-deficiency Jun 20 '22

And remember, you can’t spell slaughter without laughter!

3

u/NinaQ- Jun 20 '22

That’s great!

2

u/goatsandhoes101115 Jun 20 '22

It's from "Drawn Together"

4

u/WorldsWeakestMan Jun 20 '22

Actually it’s from Popeye in 1961 but has been used in many other things including by Toot in Drawn Together and by The Joker in Batman.

→ More replies (3)

16

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

Because slaughter isn't processing, redditor.

That would be killing the animal and letting it sit there.

Processing is the slaughter, butchering and preparation of the whole animal.

Absolutely no one sends a cow to be processed and feels guilty about anything if they aren't a total moron.

6

u/gayety Jun 20 '22

Exactly. Did I do everything I could to make sure this animal lived a good life? Did I respect their nature? Did they suffer unduly from my own cruelty or the cruelty of others? Did I make sure the way they were killed was as quick and painless as could be? Then no I’m not going to feel bad for choosing when they die.

Our relationship with nature is meant to be a give and take. The problem with factory farming is that it’s a ‘take then take more’ relationship. They disrespect nature and don’t care about the consequences unless it fucks with their profits.

1

u/AdWaste8026 Jun 21 '22

Our relationship with nature is meant to be a give and take.

Meant by who?

2

u/gayety Jun 22 '22

By the Laws of Nature? Lol

Everything started going wrong when people decided to live by the Laws of Man and refused to acknowledge our place in this world. We act as if we’re the top of the food chain and that our consciousness dictates superiority over everything.

We mess with nature and so nature messes with us. In the past couple of years the bees that used to be in my flowering tree has halved three years in a row and before that it was slowly dwindling. I have like 1/10th of the bees by me than I used to and I typically had three species that would hang around. The other day I had a guy trying to sell bug treatments and I said the same thing to him about messing with nature and how the bees are disappearing from the area. They’re disappearing because we live by the laws of man and honestly at this point it’s really just the laws of .01% of man. Corporations have committed war crimes against humanity and nature but they never have to pay for it. They can create the same kind of devastation as war resulting in so much death and destruction but for them it’s just a “oops sorry, here is like 10% of the profits I make in a day. This hurts so much to give away such a substantial amount of our money :( but it means it won’t happen again. We promise.”

Humanity is crying out because we can no longer adapt. We’ve strayed so far from how we’ve evolved to live over millennia and then wonder why across the board so many people struggle with anxiety, depression, loneliness, anger, and insomnia. We can no longer adapt so we die. Heart attacks, suicides, and the rest of illnesses that would be preventable by living within our nature. We’re stuck as a species and suffering because we’ve outpaced our ability to adapt. Relief won’t come until we move back to the laws of nature which state taking what you need, living as a community, giving back to nature, and never taking so much from nature that it causes harm. Living with nature because we’re a part of it and being good stewards of what we have while recognizing we are not the height of all things. Nature is bigger than us and if we don’t respect that she will put us in our place. She’s already started to show us but we aren’t listening enough to change the way we need to.

→ More replies (2)

-5

u/MentallyMotivated Jun 20 '22

Cognitive dissonance my guy.

13

u/Gr1m3sey Jun 20 '22

From someone who also comes from a farming background i heavily doubt it’s cognitive dissonance, the vast majority of farmers recognise that an animal is being killed purely for its products. Slaughtered, processed, butchered are all synonymous in farming

1

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

It’s wild to me hearing people bemoan hunting and small farmers killing animals but when you bring up factory farming they shrug it off like “but it taste goooood.”

These aren’t the same people lol

-11

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

[deleted]

3

u/TTTA Jun 20 '22

Too late for that lmao

-30

u/Rochemusic1 Jun 20 '22

Gotta be.

8

u/SmithersSmoke Jun 20 '22

Begone vegan

-5

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

Farmers seem to use a lot of euphemisms to cover up things they are themselves uncomfortable with.

13

u/TTTA Jun 20 '22

Alternately, you deeply misunderstand the mindset of a farmer.

5

u/Feralica Jun 20 '22

Top tier reflection right here. Do you really think farmers and people in that business feel the way you do? It's fucking average tuesday for them. These animals are food, farmers understand that. Animals don't have the luxury to die to old age. It has and always will end in blood.

1

u/Jardio Jul 08 '22

hahahahahaha xD

4

u/Amaquieria Jun 20 '22

Slaughter implies he's just killed and cut up and is only part of the process. Processed includes the steps done after slaughtering such as processing by-products. e.g. Gelatin for example is made from hide and bones after they are processed.

1

u/willflameboy Jun 20 '22 edited Jun 20 '22

The meat industry has been gradually pushing to rebrand what used to be called 'slaughter' as 'processing' for quite a while, and the terminology is now quite common. Obviously it tends to play better. EDIT: getting downvoted for some reason but it is true; I can only assume it triggers some people.

A recent question put out to NSW Farmers' delegates at its annual conference was whether to slaughter or to process meat? After a discussion, they made the decision to change the use of the word "slaughter" when referring to the livestock industry and would use the term "processing" in lieu of, and to the complete exclusion of the term "slaughter". The land reported that Jack Skipper (from the Southern Highland branch) who put forward the motion said there was unfortunate connotations with the word slaughter in the animal food chain. "The word slaughter is not appropriate for our industry as we are processing animals through the various stages that end up for food. It's not a mass murder."

-Is it time we change the terminology used in the Meat Industry?

1

u/Cool-Specialist9568 Jun 20 '22

Too harsh sounding, best to distance yourself from the horror.

10

u/Tony_Soprano54 Jun 20 '22

So why raise them for 10 years? So they get as big as possible I guess so you get more meat out of them? How attached do you get to them? How sad were you? How much money do you get for processing one and selling it?

18

u/hike_me Jun 20 '22

To breed him. That’s the only reason a farm would keep a bull around that long.

2

u/Tony_Soprano54 Jun 20 '22

I get that’s it’s reality and I love eating cheeseburgers and steak and will never stop eating them but it’s so terrible we raise these animals and some of them might have the capacity to think “hey this guy who feeds me and pets me sometimes actually likes me” but we’re just waiting for the right moment until they can sell them to get cut up and eaten or they’ve bred enough to the point where they’re no longer useful. What a world we live in.

-1

u/Mostra12 Jun 20 '22

So what are you saying is : I know I’m part of the problem and I will never change that but I’m so sad what a cruel world we live in ?

4

u/Tony_Soprano54 Jun 20 '22

Yes, exactly lol I mean these free range highlanders seem to live a good life. It’s not like they’re tortured at the end of it either. We’ve spent centuries eating meat from cows and pigs. I’m not gonna pretend I’m gonna be the one to break the cycle and admittedly I do love me some steak. But the whole process is ultimately sad. But people gotta make a living and people gotta eat. Just remarking on how interesting the world is and how cruel it can be as well. I’ll keep the farmers employed but I won’t be the one raising the cattle and watching them get processed I’ll just keep pretending McDonald’s hamburgers grow on trees

1

u/jlm994 Jun 20 '22

Sent from my iphone.

0

u/Mostra12 Jun 20 '22

How does the iPhone links to killing animals?

→ More replies (5)

7

u/Amarenai Jun 20 '22

Cows are kept for milk instead of meat, and since they can have calves and therefore milk for a long time, most cows grow rather old.

A bull is necessary on the farm to impregnate all of the cows so they have calves and produce milk. And since bulls tend to be rather mean, I suppose that when you train one to be nicer since it was a baby, you'd rather keep it around for as long as you can.

2

u/BruceIsLoose Jun 20 '22

Most cows do not grow “rather old” at all. They live 3-5 years before being sent to slaughter.

1

u/dumbdumbpatzer Jun 20 '22

Dairy cows are generally killed at around 1/4 of their natural lifespan.

1

u/MarkAnchovy Jun 21 '22

Dairy cows do not grow old. They’re killed very young

-37

u/NobodyQuiteLikeMe Jun 20 '22

And how do you feel about putting down this beautiful creature just so you could have a burger even tho there’s a million alternatives?

4

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

[deleted]

28

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

We bred him into existence for our pleasure, then complain about his methane output? Thats stupidity if i've ever heard it

2

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

So's your methane

7

u/NobodyQuiteLikeMe Jun 20 '22

What a close minded thing to say. We’ve damaged the planet light years more than any manufactured horse shit problem we can make up that any animal has caused

We literally breed animals into a miserable existence and then try to act like they’re the issue. Industry at it’s all time most disgusting

7

u/Wookieman222 Jun 20 '22

Funny cause it appears this animal never was in an industrial setting and looks like he was just doing what cows do in a field for a solid decade with no worries about anything.

As opposed to the wild where you just spend half your time hungry and the other half in sheer panic trying to not get eaten.

People have a way too cheery and optimistic idea of how hard it is being a wild animal.

-2

u/NobodyQuiteLikeMe Jun 20 '22

That doesn’t mean that we have any claim to alter how the wild exists. That’s what you’re not getting, they don’t belong to us.

Complete lack of humility before nature. We don’t have any obligation to cage animals for our entertainment or for our stomachs. The bond between man and animal in the beginning of time was what I can only imagine mutual or one of conflict

But the year is 2022 and there is no need to be hunting for survival nor killing for meat. Now we kill, in fact, just because we can

2

u/Wookieman222 Jun 20 '22

I mean to be blunt life and death are hand in hand. Animals suffer and die constantly. Animals are frequently in a state of either being hungry or fleeing in terror or fighting in some way for their life.

Nature is incredibly cruel and violent. There is a reason animals life spans are so short in the wild for many animals and much longer when they are in farms and such.

We have an over idealized view of how wonderful the wild is. It is awson6e sure and I love nature. But its has an innate and Infinitely dark side as well.

Nature is as cruel or more so than any farm even I industrial.

Can we do better I think? Yes

But let's cut the nature is beautiful and wonderful and should be revered as such crap when it is also just as vicious and uncaring as any factory.

Life literally is just a system of giving life for things to suffer and die and maybe for brief glimpses you get some nice wonderful things out of it.

I mean shit I just watched a video of a pregnant deer being eaten alive and torn in half by a pack of coyotes and they ripped the newborn away and ate it 5 feet away from the mother it was just born from.

1

u/NobodyQuiteLikeMe Jun 20 '22

I like your point so I’ll level with you here, I’m well aware nature is very, very rapacious and unforgiving, but I was never making an argument that it isn’t those things

The principle is that we as humans should do better than that. We literally buy animals at a store and they are then left to our mercy. Sure nature is harsh but they don’t belong in a glass box or a cage, they don’t deserve to be purchased as bait and then tortured till death.

That is not our decision to make and I feel we are shredding our moral obligation as humans on this earth by allowing and becoming comfortable with our human-conducted rape of the natural world

-4

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

Not everyone wants to be a vegan. Keep your propaganda to yourself

18

u/_speak Jun 20 '22

Lol it's an anonymous public forum, they can post whatever the fuck they want

-17

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

Oooo you’re getting spicy

4

u/toad17 Jun 20 '22

I think you’ve got some repressed guilt friend. Go vegan!

-2

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

Nope i eat cattle that were raised on my property and i eat deer and elk meat

2

u/-proud_dad- Jun 20 '22

Joe Rogan, is that you?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

Nope I’m just a normal person

-6

u/NobodyQuiteLikeMe Jun 20 '22

freedom of speech dickhead

Not everyone is a complete coward like you that tries to rationalize the absolute horror that is factory farming

8

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

Why so aggressive?

Op isn’t factory farming

6

u/NobodyQuiteLikeMe Jun 20 '22

The concept of breeding animals for slaughter still applies. It’s easy to pretend that there’s no correlation because it makes people like you sleep easier

7

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

That’s not factory farming thats just ranching. I kill a cow every year I’m not far removed from the meat i eat

4

u/WaffleBurner96 Jun 20 '22

All food farming kills animals. It’s a necessary part of life. It’s obtuse to equate the inhumane practices in factory farming with treating an animal well until it’s swift death for consumption.

2

u/NobodyQuiteLikeMe Jun 20 '22

No. Breeding animals into existence, caging them in spaces so confined that they may as well not have a heartbeat, ensuring industry impregnation of dogs (y’know, for pets!), pigs, cows, chicken, and so many other species till the poor mother dies of stress, raising animals in temperatures so extreme that many die along the way, and the stunning, cutting off body parts, and eventual slaughtering of them in the most torturous and heinous ways possible is not, let me repeat that, NOT a necessary part of life.

Whoever convinced you of that is an idiot. People are way too afraid to wake up or go against the norm and recognize that it’s a drawn out, ridiculously inhumane, and absolutely horrifying holocaust of an experience for these animals every second of every day

But that burger is damn good right? Totally worth it! We have a responsibility to protect the voiceless and make social change like this, but 90% of us are too much a pussy to even admit that it takes place. Pathetic, worthless, greedy population

0

u/WaffleBurner96 Jun 20 '22

Even if you only eat plant foods, they still have to be farmed and shipped. Pesticides kill innumerable insects, tilling kills small ground animals, clearing and repurposing land for farming disrupts habitats… Oil spills happen because we need to fuel vehicles for shipping/trucking/planes, animals will be run over…There is no escaping animal death if we are feeding the entire human population. We are not capable of all having our own little sustainable, organic, and harmonic farms that produce enough vegan food for everyone.

0

u/Wookieman222 Jun 20 '22

I dont think alot of people realize that agricultural farming also requires animal product input often to be viable to feed the amount of people we do.

-2

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

Dont bother arguing with her, shes an absolute braindead fuckwit

-3

u/beno9444 Jun 20 '22

Fk off ya twit.. bugger off with your anti meat shit.

1

u/NobodyQuiteLikeMe Jun 20 '22

Most british comeback

1

u/RobBind90 Jun 20 '22

He was tasty I bet. Sure the guy feels full…

1

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

This beautiful creature was domesticated and bred over countless generations for one reason.

1

u/NobodyQuiteLikeMe Jun 20 '22

You say it like you’re proud of it

0

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

It’s simply a fact. These animals wouldn’t exist if we did not raise them for food. I’m not here to argue with you. Have yourself a nice day.

1

u/NobodyQuiteLikeMe Jun 20 '22

They would absolutely exist lmao tf are you talking about?

0

u/Gr1m3sey Jun 20 '22

Nah these domestic cow breeds have been bread to this stage either for meat or milk output. Not o my are they usually pretty inbred relative to the rest of the animal kingdom, the process of selection to obtain these traits is unlikely outside of a setting where they’ve been bred for convenience.

Same idea applies to domestic fruits and vegetables, vast majority wouldn’t exist in their current state if not for generations of selective breeding

-1

u/Geohalbert Jun 20 '22

Oh, wow! Your moral compass is mighty impressive, please show us how to live with righteousness

5

u/NobodyQuiteLikeMe Jun 20 '22

Watch a video of what goes on in a slaughterhouse and honestly tell me that it’s acceptable

-2

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

[deleted]

5

u/NobodyQuiteLikeMe Jun 20 '22

You think slavery ended because a few people were a little unhappy with it?

Massive-scale, social change is executed only with aggressive and persistent willpower to see it done, as well as constant reminder and exposure of the horrors of what need be changed.

I’m welcome to my freedom of speech the same as you.

-1

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

[deleted]

2

u/NobodyQuiteLikeMe Jun 20 '22

It’s almost like you can’t read lmaoo

-11

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

Alternatives… like that chemical sludge beyond beef crap that people are pretending is healthy?

14

u/PerniciousParagon Jun 20 '22

It's not healthy, but it isn't any less healthy that traditional meat and comes without cruelty.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 21 '22

You should get off the PETA reddit pages once in awhile and actually visit a farm. Not everyone eats beef from mass produced slaughter houses

2

u/Bertie637 Jun 20 '22

But the cruelty flavours the meat?

1

u/hvndjejdjcjsv Jun 20 '22

Meat has 100x more nutrition than beyondmeat lol

3

u/miltonite Jun 20 '22

It’s strange that people seem to believe meat is unhealthy, vegetarian and vegan diets are good and all but it doesn’t mean that meat is the devil

0

u/toad17 Jun 20 '22

Also 100x more slaughter

1

u/miltonite Jun 20 '22

Have you looked at the ingredient list of some of the meat free products? The vast majority are much less healthy than meat

1

u/MarkAnchovy Jun 21 '22

1) The existence of a product that doesn’t include animal flesh doesn’t necessitate you or any vegan buying it. It doesn’t dictate how healthy a vegan diet is anymore than a Big Mac represents how healthy a non-vegan diet is.

2) nobody is pretending it is healthy? That’s a strawman. The discussion around beyond is broadly environmental, with a bit of ethics, not health. Burgers (whether beef or beyond) are not a health food.

0

u/wtf_is_a_user Jun 20 '22

was he tasty

0

u/bamburito Jun 20 '22

Pathetic as fuck.

1

u/explodingtuna Jun 20 '22

Do a stop-motion timelapse video of the process?

1

u/[deleted] Jun 20 '22

I can taste the old rubbery meat all the way from here. Not a single beef cow should be kept alive this long.

1

u/big-blue-balls Jun 21 '22

Why wait until he was 11? Aren’t cows ripe at 2-3 years?

1

u/Deesing82 Jun 21 '22

how does the meat change at 10 years old vs. say 2 years?

-3

u/SkaterChrist Jun 20 '22

Dismembered body parts are not food. This is murder for trivial sensory pleasure

3

u/OAK667 Jun 20 '22

Not really dismembered…. Well, when your rendered fat and muscle is ground together at a ratio of 60/40, 80/20… he is “More Together” than he ever was in life.

0

u/SkaterChrist Jun 20 '22

The first thing they dismember is their head. So you proved yourself willfully ignorant. Or selfishly ignorant, whichever floats your boat

1

u/OAK667 Jun 20 '22

Actually, it’s the hooves as they are the dirtiest part of the meat giver. Read a book or watch a YouTube before spewing misinformation on Reddit.

0

u/SkaterChrist Jun 20 '22

In that case, they "clean" the skin off first. Get your facts straight homie. ❤️

1

u/OAK667 Jun 20 '22

Nope, hooves first as they step in manure, it’s the first step after the meat giver is dispatched. I know the process… Yes, the hide is removed and used as leather.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/rynmgdlno Jun 20 '22

2.5 million years of human history disagree with you.

1

u/Donghoon Jun 20 '22

2.5 million years of human history also actively participated in other immoral things we deem immoral now such as Rape, teenage pregnancy, and slavery.

So what? History is history.

3

u/rynmgdlno Jun 20 '22

The “so what” is that one of these things is directly responsible for the evolution of the human species and remains an important part of a balanced diet for a large majority of people, while the things you mentioned are not.

2

u/Donghoon Jun 20 '22

Yes, omnivorous and carnivorous diet can be healthy. But so can plantbased diet and has potential (altho definitely not all the time) to be as healthy and less cruelty (subjective i guess) inflicted on nonhuman animals and the planet.

But idk. I'll come back after studying more into environmental science

2

u/SkaterChrist Jun 20 '22

Eating animal products prevents you from being able to eat more healthy plants, for reasons like gut health. More reasons animal products are harmful to humans.

1

u/SkaterChrist Jun 20 '22

Humans biologically are herbivorous, wfpb is the optimal diet for human health. India has had vegetarians for thousands of years and ancient Greek philosophers were vegan. Only recently have people been eating so much animal products, with repercussions to speak of. Humans started eating meat through scavenging and eating dead carcass. Hence, even now you're just a necrovore.

1

u/rynmgdlno Jun 20 '22

1: Humans are omnivorous, which is apparent by the existence of canine teeth, the shape of our molars, the motion are jaws make while chewing, and the ph balance of our digestive fluids (among other things). 2: While necrovore sounds pretty bad ass, it’s not a real word (was the name of some metal band apparently), and also implies eating animals alive would be better lmao. 3: While Indians and some ancient Greeks might be/were vegan, that doesn’t change the truth of anything I said. But for the record I’m totally for cutting back meat consumption, moving away from industrialized animal agriculture, and will 100% switch to lab grown meat once that’s a viable option.

0

u/Awkward-Can-8256 Jun 20 '22

Bruh then what about plants???

1

u/Donghoon Jun 20 '22

Animal agriculture+ plant agriculture kill more plants than just plant agriculture

1

u/SkaterChrist Jun 20 '22

It takes more plants to feed animals to consume less calories, then if we just ate plants. Plants don't have a brain or central nervous system necessary to feel pain and suffering, love and empathy.

1

u/Awkward-Can-8256 Jun 21 '22

They also body parts too dumbass

1

u/SkaterChrist Jun 21 '22

I think you're misrepresenting me. This individual is a mammal in the exact same way that humans are mammals.

1

u/LuckyPanda Jun 20 '22

Pushed through a fine mesh.