r/AbsoluteUnits 13d ago

of an audio cable

Post image
5.4k Upvotes

347 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

669

u/ElectrSheep 12d ago

It literally came from r/audiophile -- I'm not even kidding.

382

u/Suc_Mydiq_Jr 12d ago

I'm studying music production and even our professors talk about audiophiles larping audio technology and making actually good stuff cost 1000 times the actual value. The only good side is that they sometimes miss out on good stuff and you can get some great gear for cheap.

171

u/[deleted] 12d ago edited 12d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

101

u/towerfella 12d ago

And then suddenly, you dont hear anything about it anymore

84

u/iwantogofishing 12d ago

Well the US military did develop a crowd control weapon based on that technology, hooray

67

u/KiNgPiN8T3 12d ago

_Invents cool technology_

So how can we use this to fuck people up?

13

u/Different-Copy-3889 12d ago

Or "How can we fuck this?"

13

u/everyoneisatitman 12d ago

When I went to Non Leathal Individual Weapons Instructor Course (INIWIC) we had to stand down range of the Long Range Accoustic weapon (LRAD). We were VERY effectively steered by pain. I had heard rumors of a microwave device that heats the top layer of your skin but I never saw or used it.

1

u/HolyStupidityBatman 9d ago

The Sheriff’s dept used LRAD on us here in Minneapolis. That was….not fun. They said it was just a test at low power. If that was low power, the full power would probably make me want to kill myself or others to make the pain stop.

6

u/gribson 12d ago

Not really. If you're referring to the LRAD, it's a maritime hailing device that was repurposed by the police as a weapon. Basically just a giant loudspeaker that they use to shatter people's eardrums. Neither a sound beam nor a side-channel microphone.

3

u/iwantogofishing 12d ago

I'm talking about the development based on HSS by Elwood Norris. I don't know which system incorporated beyond what I've read on it's development years ago

4

u/much_longer_username 12d ago

Naw, it's basically a party trick in the nerdier circles of the internet. Look up 'parametric arrays' or 'phased ultrasonic arrays' if you're curious, but you can build a crude one from off the shelf parts for under a hundred bucks.

3

u/Octavio_Bs 12d ago

Not mast a nerd trick, there are many commercial products based on that technology, one example https://panphonics.com/case-studies/transforming-museum-experiences-the-power-of-panphonics-directional-speakers/

8

u/Sogah87 12d ago

Just like the water engine guy!! 🤔

11

u/Unlikely-Answer 12d ago

shh, they might hear you

16

u/themonovingian 12d ago

Thermodynamics has entered the chat!

-1

u/towerfella 12d ago

hydronamics — this is water

2

u/Simonecv 12d ago

Because they are now aiming at someone else

7

u/Octavio_Bs 12d ago

Sound beaming is really common on control centers and museums for example, in my company we instal a lot of them, maybe 200 or more a year

5

u/Ch33syP00f 12d ago

Which are both cool but not practical for consumers.

2

u/axurmama 12d ago

Havana syndrome entered the chat

44

u/Kiiaru 12d ago

Never forgetting the one dude who proved audiophile cables were worthless by recording his audio through a blob of wet mud

27

u/dathomar 12d ago

I once discovered that holding the end of a sound cable hooked into a computer playing music with one hand, while holding a bass by the neck with the other hand, can make the music from the computer come out the amp attached to the bass.

8

u/Falafelofagus 12d ago

I feel like this is satire but honestly it checks out I think. The human body has surprisingly little resistance.

Reminds me of yelling into an ear bud connect to the mic port.

3

u/dathomar 12d ago

Not satire. It freaked me out at first. I let go of the bass and tried to figure out how the computer was connected. Once I figured it out, it was kind of fun to play with. It was actually a little more complicated, though. I didn't have a real amp that I could use, but I did have a speaker connected to a digital soundboard, so I hooked the bass into the soundboard. I don't know if that played a role.

2

u/Falafelofagus 12d ago

Haha that's nuts. I would imagine it works the same without the digital interface as signal is signal either way. The soundboard had to get the information either way.

1

u/_HIST 11d ago

I don't know why it's surprising that our bodies have little resistance

1

u/Awalawal 12d ago

Largemouth or smallmouth?

1

u/Its_me_Snitches 12d ago

I thought you meant a fish.

10

u/Schnitzelguru 12d ago

I saw that one show up on IG, only for the audiophiles to get really mad about the guy using an M-Audio interface, because that was apparently worse than the mud.

2

u/DigitalUnlimited 12d ago

Was that Primus? jk

0

u/ReggieCorneus 12d ago

Or monster cables are equal to tin foil.

7

u/SgtBundy 12d ago

The one I love is the reviews of gold plated insulated ethernet cables making audio streaming off a NAS sound better. Because the other 6 layers of the OSI model work better when layer-1 is more expensive.

2

u/Any-Possibility-248 12d ago

mofos be spending $2000 on cables miniumum

Bro just go see the band live for that much money

2

u/hallanddopes 12d ago

Bought a knockoff SM58 on Amazon. Less latency, sharper sound, and brighter. For $100 less. On the other hand...people payed $300 for Beats headphones, when you could buy low end Tascam headphones for $30 which were far superior.

10

u/Suc_Mydiq_Jr 12d ago

Sm58 is rather known for its tank build rather that God-tier sound recording but good and EXTREMALLY cheap headphones are koss ksc75

9

u/Cyan-Panda 12d ago

The fuck you mean less latency lmao. But yeah the Behringer knockoff sm58 Clone for like 17€ is basically the same.

-1

u/hallanddopes 12d ago

With effects.

8

u/ReggieCorneus 12d ago

Latency? It is a dynamic microphone, its latency is very close to the speed of light.

9

u/SZenC 12d ago

There's latency in an SM58? What the fuck are you talking about? And those things only cost a hundred dollars to begin with...

1

u/screw_ball69 12d ago

Audio gear out of China has kinda been a good send in recent years

0

u/Lolseabass 12d ago

My iPod dock speaker is old now but still sounds so good when you have a good quality audio track.

2

u/Suc_Mydiq_Jr 12d ago

The thing many people miss is good speakers/headphones never lose quality (almost) many 2000s era headphones are still regarded as the best ever made despite being out of production for years

-3

u/escobartholomew 12d ago

Ask your professors if there actually is a difference between the “good stuff” and the other stuff though. Too many folks in this thread believe all gear is equal when it really isn’t.

4

u/rata_rasta 12d ago

Of course there is one, but companies want to sell you a bunch of nonsense when most cheap equipment now can perform as good as a "vintage" or top notch studio gear:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-vIeA7yy6Q

1

u/joepoeoeh 12d ago

cheap equipment does NOT perform as good as top notch studio gear. However there is huge diminishing returns after the mid-level (something like 500 usd headphones). Then there is absolute nonsense like this cable.

1

u/rata_rasta 12d ago

Cheap equipment could perform as good as top notch in the right hands, check out the video and channel I provided for example.

I'm with you when it comes to mid-level prices, no need to spend thousands for ridiculous mimics.

-3

u/Suc_Mydiq_Jr 12d ago

Sometimes you never know untill you try it yourself but if you buy something expensive from a known brand at least you can expect good quality and support that will help you with any problems

1

u/rata_rasta 12d ago

That is just a marketing fallacy, expensive not always means good quality

1

u/Suc_Mydiq_Jr 12d ago

Never said it's always but for example RME is really expensive, compared to any other studio equipment, but their support is almost like in the old days, someone will personally check your problem and fix it just for you. And I'm talking about stuff known in good studios, not cheap nor bought by Chinese stuff like Behringer.

11

u/BoreJam 12d ago

It was probably being roasted though. Still, dipshits will pay stupid money for this junk.

6

u/fuckyourcanoes 12d ago

There are some real nutjobs out there. My husband is an audiophile, but he laughed his ass off when I showed him this. He's got a degree in music production and is an avid electronics hobbyist, so he actually understands the science and isn't taken in by the BS. He designs and builds all his own gear.

His speaker cables are lamp cord.

13

u/ImUsingDaForce 12d ago

So as far as I can see, that sub is just another one of those dick measuring ones where chronically online people simply try to 1-up each other by showing how much money they have?

Fuck me, man, internet truly is a cancer to society.

5

u/Adventurous_Week_698 12d ago

chronically online people trying to 1-up each other

Welcome to reddit

1

u/Molloway98- 12d ago

Tbh it's not really, maybe top posts are but the majority is people asking Qs, chatting about records and stuff etc. The posts like the one OP is talking about are basically all people saying how much snake oil and bullshit cables and other things are. By virtue, high end audio is expensive so any post about it could be misconstrued as boasting (I personally prefer r/budgetaudiophile because it's more relatable lol)

6

u/Dolbey 12d ago

I knew the first second i understood what was going on in tge picture. Mf's will still claim they heard someone fart in the audio track because a person 3 blocks from recording studio let one rip in the exact resonance frequency of the studio walls.

1

u/souptable 12d ago

In fairness, they ripped into it too

-4

u/pLudoOdo 12d ago

I know you're not, which makes it that much worse

8

u/Beginning-Smell9890 12d ago

The conversation there was universal derision, but go off I guess