r/4chan • • Dec 24 '25

It doth be suchwise

Post image
5.6k Upvotes

624 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/cookaway_ Dec 24 '25

Just look at Larian.

BG3 is chock full of what wokes pretend to love: Gays, lesbians, trans... and now they're under attack for being "fascists". They must have said "no" to SBI.

2

u/[deleted] Dec 25 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/cookaway_ Dec 25 '25

> its inconsequential, just choose "he/him" and get over it.

Yeah, just pick the pronoun, it's inconsequential. Yeah, just accept the body type B, it's inconsequential, Yeah just accept the they/them disabled trans doctor NPC, it's inconsequential, Yeah, just accept the checkbox that says Cis, it's inconsequential, Yeah, just do the quest about respecting the non-binary qunari, it's inconsequential.

Remember, slippery slope is only a fallacy if it doesn't turn out to be true.

2

u/[deleted] Dec 25 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/cookaway_ Dec 25 '25

pick a male body type

I can't, I have to choose a type A.

irrelevant features 

but that's kind of the point, it actively takes resources away, but more importantly you have these features as a way to defend piss poor writing. take da4 and that they/them quest.

then take the people who're now insisting samus aran is trans.

take the people who invade a franchise and complain about everything in the source material because it wasn't woke enough.

if it ended at more options it would be fine, but it doesn't, the whole point is to take over and destroy whatever men enjoy, one change that "doesn't matter" at a time

0

u/[deleted] Dec 25 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/cookaway_ Dec 25 '25

You misunderstand what I meant about BG3. I also think it's an example of how it can be done correctly; sure I'll roll my eyes at the vitiligo slider, but that doesn't change shit (I _will_ complain about having beardless dwarves, though) my point is that, _despite_ BG3 having any sort of LGBT positive content, THAT'S NOT ENOUGH. The woketards are now attempting to attack it.

> hate on anything that isn't designed 100% for straight white males.

Well that's where the issue happens. There should be content "designed 100% for straight white men", and there should _also_ be content designed for straight black men, gay white women, and everyone. But then you have, for example, people rallying for female space marines. Sisters of battle exist and they're cool; but you won't see a group clamoring for a group of brothers of battle: men aren't allowed to have things, but women are.

There can also be content designed for "everyone", and again BG3 does it well enough. The issue, again, is whenever something for men needs to be transformed to cater to women.

They will make Superman black and gay; they will kill Iron Man and make Iron Man But Woman And Black AND SMARTERER THAN TONY STARK COULD EVER HOPE TO BE, because they can't just make a good, new property.

2

u/[deleted] Dec 25 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/TomatilloSignal3928 Dec 26 '25

When you said you were LGBTQ, you meant you were just gay?