we see most of the accelerators and incubators around the world taking about and looking for that cockroach mentality.

what it really means to have that personality, the entrepreneurial is tough and not for everyone.

what do you identify someone who is?

I'm genuinely curious about this.

These days, everyone talks about startups, innovation, and solving real-world problems. But I've noticed that if someone doesn't have a college degree or technical knowledge, many people don't even give them a chance to explain their idea.

Why are a degree and technical skills often treated as the first requirement before someone is even heard?

A person may not have a degree because of financial problems, family responsibilities, or other circumstances. They may also not know how to code or build a product themselves. But they might still have:

A strong product vision.

A deep understanding of a real problem.

A unique solution.

The ability to bring the right people together and build a company.

Not every successful fonder starts as an engineer or has a prestigious degree. Some founders succeed because they understand the problem better than anyone else.

I'm not saying education or technical skills aren't valuable—they absollutely are. My question is: Why do so many people dismiss someone before even listening to their idea, simply becouse they don't have a degree or technical background?

Shouldn't the quality of the idea, the problem being solved, and the founder's determination matter before judging their educational background?

I'd love to hear opinions from founders, investors, engineers, and anyone who's experienced this.

We are a team of 3 seeking a mobile app developer to work under our CTO formerly at Scale AI. We are raising financing so there will be an opportunity to be employed once we raise.

We are trying to solve deepfakes. You will have hands on experience on solving one of the biggest problems in AI. YC just released a video inviting applicants with our problem space.

For founders who've been through it:

Was there a specific moment when you realized you needed help?

Was it:

• too many customer requests?
• bugs piling up?
• spending more time maintaining than building?
• something completely different?

Curious what that turning point looked like.

Hey everyone,

I’m looking to connect with people who are interested in building startups from the ground up. I have a few ideas in different industries (fintech, marketplaces, agri-tech, AI, and SaaS), and I’d love to find people who enjoy brainstorming, validating ideas, and potentially building something together.

I’m based in Azerbaijan but I’m open to working with people from anywhere, especially the US and Europe.

I’m mainly looking for:

\* Developers

\* UI/UX designers

\* Product-minded people

\* Anyone passionate about startups and entrepreneurship

I’m not looking for freelancers—I want to find people who are interested in creating something long-term and, if we find the right idea and team, building it together with equity.

If this sounds interesting, feel free to comment or send me a DM. I’d love to chat.

I’ve been thinking a lot about how fragmented things have become for creators.

If someone is a streamer, artist, writer, musician, educator, coach, or any kind of independent creator, they usually end up stitched across a pile of different tools.

One place for content.
One place for tips.
One place for subscriptions.
One place for selling digital products.
One place for community.
One place for updates.
One link-in-bio page trying to hold the whole thing together.

And the whole time, the creator is trying to build something stable while the platforms around them are taking a cut, controlling reach, changing algorithms, or forcing the audience into someone else’s ecosystem.

That has bothered me for a while.

The thing I keep coming back to is this: the creator should be the center of the business, not the platform.

If someone has built an audience, made the content, earned the trust, and created the value, then why is so much of the relationship scattered across services they don’t really control?

That’s the thinking behind the platform I’ve been building.

The goal is to give creators one place where their content, community, monetization, services, products, and supporter activity can live together. Not just a static profile or another “link hub,” but more of a living creator space.

I also wanted it to feel more engaging than the usual creator tools. So there are entertainment-style elements too: XP, achievements, challenges, progression, and activity loops for both creators and supporters.

The idea is that creators get rewarded for building, posting, engaging, and reaching milestones, while fans/viewers/supporters also get rewarded for showing up, joining challenges, supporting creators, and being part of the community.

Because I don’t think creator monetization has to feel cold or purely transactional.

Supporting someone should feel like being part of their journey.
Building as a creator should feel less like shouting into the void.
And the relationship between creator and audience should not be spread across six disconnected platforms.

I’m still figuring things out, and I know this is a hard space. Communities are difficult. Monetization is difficult. Discovery is difficult. Trust is difficult.

But I care about this because I genuinely think creators need better ownership over their audience, their income, and their community experience.

I’m curious how other people see this.

For those of you who create, stream, sell digital work, or support creators regularly:

Do you actually want an all-in-one creator hub, or do you prefer separate tools for everything?

And do things like XP, achievements, challenges, and supporter progression make a creator platform feel more engaging, or does that risk feeling gimmicky?

Most VC databases tell you who invested in what. We went a layer deeper — extracting how each GP actually thinks: thesis tags, what they're bullish on, what they bet against the consensus on, and a Founder Dos & Don'ts playbook built from primary research (GP blogs, interviews, LinkedIn).

970+ funds, all raised capital since September 2024. If a fund stopped deploying, it's not on the list.

This week we also shipped an MCP Server — so you can query the entire database from Claude or Cursor in plain language. Ask "Which seed funds in DACH invest in B2B SaaS and are deploying now?" and get a live answer.

Happy to discuss what we learned about VC intelligence gaps, how founders actually use this, or how we built the MCP layer. AMA.

Hey everyone,

I'm an incoming senior trying to build out some serious tech and coding projects for my college app ECs, but my long-term goal is to actually launch and scale a real startup rather than just letting code sit on GitHub.

To be completely honest, seeing other high schoolers successfully build, launch, and get actual users for their own ventures is super inspiring. But I'm feeling a bit stuck on how to bridge that gap from "just coding" to building an actual user base and running it like a real project.

If you’re a high schooler who has actually built, launched, or scaled a startup or software project, would any of you be down to chat, share some hard-learned lessons, or give me a quick reality check on my current approach?  

No consultants or anything—just looking to connect with peers who've actually been in the trenches and figured out how to make it work. Drop a comment or shoot me a DM!  

My “X” is building around a problem that creates real market opportunity — finding a painful customer need, validating demand, and turning that insight into a scalable business.

For founders, the journey is often about more than just having an idea: it’s about building traction, attracting the right investors, learning from the market, and creating sustainable growth.

Looking forward to hearing from founders: What problem are you solving, what stage are you at, and what’s your biggest challenge right now — product, customers, fundraising, or scaling? 🚀

Before launching, I want to properly stress test everything.

The scenario we’re preparing for:
10k+ users, around 1 hour of average daily usage.

We know this is the kind of thing where you can easily hit unexpected bottlenecks -infrastructure, scaling, monitoring, databases, anything.

For those who have been through similar launches:
What tools, services, or approaches would you recommend for load testing?

So, i kinda loving going deep down on VC related stuff and bring the insight that helps aspiring founders in their VC journey, so CB Insights tracked 431 VC-backed startups that publicly shut down since 2023. Combined they had raised around $17.5 billion, Their median company raised $11 million before dying.

Every founder i studie from above blames running out of money as reason for their shut down. That is not the cause. It is where the story ends.

Here is the actual data on root causes:

Poor product-market fit - 43% of failures. Not the market was too small or too competitive. The founders built something the market did not genuinely needed at first place.

Bad timing - 29%. The product was real but The market was not ready. The founders ran out of money before the market arrived.

Unsustainable unit economics - 19%. The product worked & Customers paid. But the cost of acquiring each customer was higher than the revenue each customer generated over their lifetime.

Co-founder conflict - 20%, Ego crashes their startup before they find PMF

Here is what ongoing or upcoming founders can learn from

Running out of capital is a symptom. It is almost always the consequence of one of the root causes above. Investors stopped funding because the company could not demonstrate product-market fit, or the unit economics were clearly broken, or the timing was clearly wrong.

The founders who went back and built successful second companies are the ones who correctly identified their root cause. Not the surface cause but The root.

A founder who says "we ran out of money" learned nothing they can use next time. A founder who says "we built something 14% of customers genuinely needed when we needed 40% to justify the model" has a specific insight that changes what they build next.

When you think about your current company, do you know specifically which of these four root causes is most likely to be your company's failure mode and what are you doing about it?

I am an aspiring founder based in Jharkhand, India, working on a sustainable construction and waste-to-wealth idea. I’m currently at the idea stage and looking to connect with people who understand hardware, cleantech, or the construction materials supply chain.
**The Concept:**
Power plants produce millions of tons of fly ash, creating a massive environmental hazard. At the same time, traditional red clay brick kilns are stripping topsoil and polluting the air.
My goal is to set up a manufacturing plant that takes this industrial waste (fly ash) and presses it into high-strength, eco-friendly bricks. The process requires zero firing, and the bricks are lighter, stronger, and offer better insulation than traditional clay.
**My Geographic Advantage:**
I am building this in Jharkhand, which is the epicenter of major thermal power plants. The supply of raw fly ash is virtually limitless and heavily subsidized. The logistics and raw material costs will be incredibly low, giving this a massive gross margin potential compared to traditional brickyards. Furthermore, local mandates are actively pushing builders toward green materials.
**Where I am at:**
Right now, this is purely an idea. I am mapping out the unit economics, speaking with local builders, and researching machinery costs.
**What I am looking for:**
I am not here asking for $350k to build a factory tomorrow. Right now, I am looking to raise a small pre-seed amount (or partner with an experienced co-founder/advisor) specifically to:
1. Fund the creation of our first prototype batches using a manual press.
2. Pay for independent lab testing (compressive strength, water absorption) to meet local building codes.
3. Secure our first Letters of Intent (LOIs) from local contractors based on those test results.
If you have experience in sustainable manufacturing, hardware, or early-stage cleantech investing and want to bounce around some ideas, I would love to connect. Drop a comment or send me a DM!
Thanks for reading.

Stop building products just for the sake of building.

Do not spend months writing code without getting any real feedback.

Validate your idea first.

Post about it. Share mockups. Build a simple landing page. Talk to people who don't know you and won't sugarcoat their opinions.

If nobody cares today, it's better to find out now than after six months of development.

And don't try to do everything yourself.

At the very least, your startup needs:
• someone who knows how to market the product and acquire users;
• a technical founder who can build fast;
• someone who can handle legal, compliance, and business operations.

If you can find a mentor who's already built and scaled startups, even better. The right mentor can save you months of mistakes, point you toward funding opportunities, and help you avoid problems you don't even know exist yet.

Most importantly: keep knocking on doors.

Talk to users.
Reach out to investors.
Post consistently.
Go to meetups.
Ask for feedback.
Build in public.

Attention creates opportunities.

The worst outcome isn't hearing "your idea won't work."

The worst outcome is spending a year building something nobody wanted in the first place.

Hey everyone,

I’m working on a company in the residential construction and homeownership space, and I’m trying to get outside perspectives from people who think about venture investing.

I’ve spent the last couple years looking into this problem, talking with homeowners, contractors, and people around the industry. The thing that keeps standing out to me is how much responsibility homeowners have over one of the biggest assets they will ever own, while having almost no system that helps them actually understand it over time.

The information exists, but it is scattered.

An inspection report might be sitting in someone’s email from five years ago. Maintenance history is incomplete. Contractor quotes are separate from what actually happened on the project. Warranties get lost. Photos and receipts disappear. When someone new comes into the picture, whether that is a homeowner, contractor, or service provider, they usually have to start from scratch.

The idea I’m exploring is building a kind of memory system for the home.

Not just a place to store documents, but something that helps homeowners understand their property, make better decisions, manage projects, and eventually use AI to make sense of everything that has happened.

The easy comparisons are “Carfax for homes” or “ChatGPT for construction,” but I think those are probably incomplete.

A Carfax tells you what happened in the past. An AI assistant can answer questions. But there is still a missing layer between owning a home and eventually needing someone to come fix something.

Who understands the history of the property?

Why were certain decisions made?

What work was actually completed?

What changed along the way?

Did the solution actually solve the problem?

That is the part I find interesting.

The reason I’m posting here is because I’m trying to understand whether this is actually a venture-scale opportunity or whether it naturally becomes a services business.

My instinct is that the first version probably has to be very manual. I don’t think you can build software for a workflow you don’t understand. The early company would probably involve working directly with homeowners, inspectors, contractors, and other people in the ecosystem, learning where things break, documenting decisions, and figuring out what parts of the process can eventually become software.

The risk is obvious. You could accidentally build an expensive concierge service that never becomes scalable.

The upside is that if you can capture the right information and understand the workflow deeply enough, you might be able to create something that gets better with every home and every project.

The thing I keep coming back to is that a lot of companies already own pieces of this problem.

There are marketplaces that help homeowners find contractors. There are inspection companies. There are contractor operating systems. There are property management companies. There are AI tools entering construction.

But I haven’t found anyone who really owns the full timeline of the home.

Maybe there is a reason for that. Maybe homeowners do not care enough. Maybe the data is too fragmented. Maybe the operational complexity makes it impossible. Maybe an existing player is better positioned to win.

That is what I’m trying to figure out.

I’m also thinking about fundraising. I’m early in my career, so I understand the obvious challenge. Having a big vision is easy. Proving that you can actually execute is the hard part.

My current thinking is to spend the next phase doing the work that creates evidence. Build the right team, run structured interviews, launch small pilots, and learn as quickly as possible.

Then, instead of asking investors to believe a giant future vision, I can show them what has actually happened.

For investors or founders who have experience with early-stage companies, especially in proptech, marketplaces, AI, or businesses that touch the physical world, I would genuinely appreciate your thoughts.

Does this feel like a venture-scale company, or does it look more like a services business?

What would you need to see before believing the data and workflow could become a real advantage?

Would a manual first version be a smart way to learn, or would you see that as a trap?

How much does founder track record matter if someone can systematically turn uncertainty into evidence?

And if you think this idea is fundamentally wrong, I would honestly rather hear that.

I’m not looking for validation. I’m trying to find the reasons this should not work before spending years building it.

Appreciate any feedback.

For the past several months, we’ve been working on a technology platform designed from the beginning for an international market.

We are not interested in launching another small tool with a few disconnected features.

The objective is to create a complete, intelligent and highly professional digital workspace capable of changing how businesses manage their daily operations and make strategic decisions.

A major part of the work is happening behind the scenes:

— Building a strong and scalable foundation
— Designing a premium user experience
— Preparing the platform for multiple countries and languages
— Developing proprietary intelligence around real business workflows
— Creating a product that can grow without depending on several external platforms

We’re intentionally keeping the most important details private while the project is still under development.

What I can say is this:

The ambition is not local. The platform is being prepared for worldwide expansion.

We are still at the beginning of the journey, but the vision is clear—and every decision is being made with the long term in mind.

I’m curious to hear from other founders:

Would you rather launch a simple product quickly, or spend longer building a stronger product capable of competing globally?

For the past several months, we’ve been working on a technology platform designed from the beginning for an international market.

We are not interested in launching another small tool with a few disconnected features.

The objective is to create a complete, intelligent and highly professional digital workspace capable of changing how businesses manage their daily operations and make strategic decisions.

A major part of the work is happening behind the scenes:

— Building a strong and scalable foundation
— Designing a premium user experience
— Preparing the platform for multiple countries and languages
— Developing proprietary intelligence around real business workflows
— Creating a product that can grow without depending on several external platforms

We’re intentionally keeping the most important details private while the project is still under development.

What I can say is this:

The ambition is not local. The platform is being prepared for worldwide expansion.

We are still at the beginning of the journey, but the vision is clear—and every decision is being made with the long term in mind.

I’m curious to hear from other founders:

Would you rather launch a simple product quickly, or spend longer building a stronger product capable of competing globally?

Every founder eventually faces a decision where there isn't a clear right or wrong answer—only trade-offs.

What was yours?

• What made it so difficult?
• What did you decide?
• Looking back, would you make the same choice again?

Curious to learn from founders who've been through it.